Regulatory Compliance and Bias Risk in AI Surveillance: A Case Study of Plate Recognition Under SCRAM

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14

This study introduces a framework to evaluate AI surveillance systems for regulatory compliance and bias risk, finding that high detection accuracy in license plate recognition systems does not guarantee fairness or legal acceptability.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14 · read from full text

This preprint proposes a scenario-based evaluation framework (SCRAM) to assess both regulatory compliance and algorithmic bias risk in AI-enabled surveillance, using license plate recognition systems in Türkiye as a case study. The authors simulate operational configurations that vary decision thresholds and data retention periods, then evaluate fairness using Statistical Parity Difference and Disparate Impact Ratio alongside a compliance score derived from KVKK (Personal Data Protection Law) and constitutional jurisprudence. They find that high technical detection accuracy does not guarantee meeting legal and fairness thresholds, with multiple configurations failing normative acceptability. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract As artificial intelligence systems increasingly govern public safety operations, concerns over algorithmic fairness and legal compliance intensify. This study introduces a scenario-based evaluation framework (SCRAM) that simultaneously measures regulatory conformity and bias risks in AI-enabled surveillance. Using license plate recognition (LPR) systems in Türkiye as a case study, we simulate multiple operational configurations that vary decision thresholds and data retention periods. Each configuration is assessed through fairness metrics (Statistical Parity Difference, Disparate Impact Ratio) and a compliance score derived from KVKK (Türkiye’s Personal Data Protection Law) and constitutional jurisprudence. Our findings show that technical performance does not guarantee normative acceptability: several configurations with high detection accuracy fail to meet legal and fairness thresholds. The SCRAM model offers a modular and adaptable approach to align AI deployments with ethical and legal standards and highlights how policy-sensitive parameters critically shape risk landscapes. We conclude with implications for real-time audit systems and cross-jurisdictional AI governance.
Full text 9,526 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Regulatory Compliance and Bias Risk in AI Surveillance: A Case Study of Plate Recognition Under SCRAM | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Regulatory Compliance and Bias Risk in AI Surveillance: A Case Study of Plate Recognition Under SCRAM Kadir Kesgin This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6498223/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract As artificial intelligence systems increasingly govern public safety operations, concerns over algorithmic fairness and legal compliance intensify. This study introduces a scenario-based evaluation framework (SCRAM) that simultaneously measures regulatory conformity and bias risks in AI-enabled surveillance. Using license plate recognition (LPR) systems in Türkiye as a case study, we simulate multiple operational configurations that vary decision thresholds and data retention periods. Each configuration is assessed through fairness metrics (Statistical Parity Difference, Disparate Impact Ratio) and a compliance score derived from KVKK (Türkiye’s Personal Data Protection Law) and constitutional jurisprudence. Our findings show that technical performance does not guarantee normative acceptability: several configurations with high detection accuracy fail to meet legal and fairness thresholds. The SCRAM model offers a modular and adaptable approach to align AI deployments with ethical and legal standards and highlights how policy-sensitive parameters critically shape risk landscapes. We conclude with implications for real-time audit systems and cross-jurisdictional AI governance. License Plate Recognition Algorithmic Fairness KVKK Compliance SCRAM Framework AI Surveillance Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6498223","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":446160880,"identity":"88d9b706-b234-427c-8883-8026aacece76","order_by":0,"name":"Kadir Kesgin","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kadir","middleName":"","lastName":"Kesgin","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-04-21 18:38:13","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6498223/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6498223/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":86056028,"identity":"fcaca2b2-2fe5-415b-aefc-5bb7062a9883","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-07-05 06:08:28","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1421610,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"scramsprin.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6498223/v1_covered_f4edcbff-1ea9-440c-8786-134f1bab7625.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Regulatory Compliance and Bias Risk in AI Surveillance: A Case Study of Plate Recognition Under SCRAM","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"License Plate Recognition, Algorithmic Fairness, KVKK Compliance, SCRAM Framework, AI Surveillance","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6498223/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6498223/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eAs artificial intelligence systems increasingly govern public safety operations, concerns over algorithmic fairness and legal compliance intensify. This study introduces a scenario-based evaluation framework (SCRAM) that simultaneously measures regulatory conformity and bias risks in AI-enabled surveillance. Using license plate recognition (LPR) systems in T\u0026uuml;rkiye as a case study, we simulate multiple operational configurations that vary decision thresholds and data retention periods. Each configuration is assessed through fairness metrics (Statistical Parity Difference, Disparate Impact Ratio) and a compliance score derived from KVKK (T\u0026uuml;rkiye\u0026rsquo;s Personal Data Protection Law) and constitutional jurisprudence. Our findings show that technical performance does not guarantee normative acceptability: several configurations with high detection accuracy fail to meet legal and fairness thresholds. The SCRAM model offers a modular and adaptable approach to align AI deployments with ethical and legal standards and highlights how policy-sensitive parameters critically shape risk landscapes. We conclude with implications for real-time audit systems and cross-jurisdictional AI governance.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Regulatory Compliance and Bias Risk in AI Surveillance: A Case Study of Plate Recognition Under SCRAM","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-04-23 04:45:39","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6498223/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"b93ce74e-23f3-4424-93e6-7265a5fd71e0","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 23rd, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-07-05T06:08:07+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-04-23 04:45:39","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6498223","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6498223","identity":"rs-6498223","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00