Enzyme Classification via Semi-Supervised Functional Residue Learning

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Predicting enzymatic function from a protein sequence is a fundamental task in protein discovery and engineering. In this paper, we present S emi-supervised L earning for E nzym e C lassification (SLEEC): a semi-supervised learning framework that learns a function-aware protein representation for Enzyme Commision (EC) number prediction. SLEEC achieves SOTA performance on standard bench-marks and provides interpretable, residue-level annotations. We further demonstrate that our framework is robust to benign sequence modifications routinely observed in protein engineering workflows– such as appending functional tags– a desirable property that current ML frameworks lack. Our main technical contribution is a multiple sequence alignment (MSA)-based data augmentation technique for discovering sparse residue activations within a given enzyme sequence.
Full text 994 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Predicting enzymatic function from a protein sequence is a fundamental task in protein discovery and engineering. In this paper, we present Semi-supervised Learning for Enzyme Classification (SLEEC): a semi-supervised learning framework that learns a function-aware protein representation for Enzyme Commision (EC) number prediction. SLEEC achieves SOTA performance on standard bench-marks and provides interpretable, residue-level annotations. We further demonstrate that our framework is robust to benign sequence modifications routinely observed in protein engineering workflows– such as appending functional tags– a desirable property that current ML frameworks lack. Our main technical contribution is a multiple sequence alignment (MSA)-based data augmentation technique for discovering sparse residue activations within a given enzyme sequence. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes dz367{at}rutgers.edu danny.diaz{at}utexas.edu

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00