Independence of Perceptual and Motor Processes in Motor Imagery

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

The paper examined whether motor imagery (MI) relies on motor-system simulation or instead depends mainly on perceptual/cognitive processes, using the size-weight illusion to dissociate perception from action. Fifty-seven adults were split into groups that trained with either MI and overt execution (OE) or only MI, with different amounts of pre-exposure to the illusion, and were tested on lifting dynamics for bricks that differed in size despite equal mass. Contrary to the prediction that MI would produce illusion-consistent lifting only, the OE and MI-10 groups both maintained the illusion effect post-training, while the MI-2 group reverted to prior beliefs that larger objects are heavier and adjusted lifting force accordingly. As a preprint with preliminary, unreviewed data, this study’s conclusions are not peer-validated. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Whether motor imagery (MI) engages the motor system or relies on perceptual/cognitive processes is a matter of debate. Here we used the size weight illusion to create dissociation between perception and action to address the nature of MI. Participants alternated lifting bricks of equal mass but where one brick was larger than the other, resulting in a perceptual illusion. Fifty-seven participants (M=20, F=37, 22.54.4 years; collected 2019-22) were divided into three groups differing in the modality used for training (MI and overt execution; OE) and exposure to the size weight illusion pre-training (one (MI-2) and five (MI-10 and OE) lifts of each brick). We hypothesized that the MI groups would use lifting dynamics post-training consistent with the illusion, whereas the OE group would maintain accurate lifting forces. Contrary to our hypothesis, the OE and MI-10 groups maintained the effect of the illusion post-training. In the MI-2 group, perception of the bricks’ weight reverted to the participant’s prior belief that large objects are heavy and they correspondingly adjusted their lifting force post-training. These results demonstrate that perceptual and motor processes are engaged during MI, and that the simulation of the motor component of the movement during MI guides the performed action.
Full text 6,648 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Independence of Perceptual and Motor Processes in Motor Imagery | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL European Journal of Neuroscience This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 27 November 2024 V1 Latest version Share on Independence of Perceptual and Motor Processes in Motor Imagery Authors : Jack Solomon 0000-0001-9956-2916 , Ernest Ng 0000-0001-5917-5735 , David Westwood 0000-0003-3317-0447 , and Shaun Boe 0000-0001-7477-0049 [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.173268570.08270535/v1 321 views 220 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract Whether motor imagery (MI) engages the motor system or relies on perceptual/cognitive processes is a matter of debate. Here we used the size weight illusion to create dissociation between perception and action to address the nature of MI. Participants alternated lifting bricks of equal mass but where one brick was larger than the other, resulting in a perceptual illusion. Fifty-seven participants (M=20, F=37, 22.54.4 years; collected 2019-22) were divided into three groups differing in the modality used for training (MI and overt execution; OE) and exposure to the size weight illusion pre-training (one (MI-2) and five (MI-10 and OE) lifts of each brick). We hypothesized that the MI groups would use lifting dynamics post-training consistent with the illusion, whereas the OE group would maintain accurate lifting forces. Contrary to our hypothesis, the OE and MI-10 groups maintained the effect of the illusion post-training. In the MI-2 group, perception of the bricks’ weight reverted to the participant’s prior belief that large objects are heavy and they correspondingly adjusted their lifting force post-training. These results demonstrate that perceptual and motor processes are engaged during MI, and that the simulation of the motor component of the movement during MI guides the performed action. Supplementary Material File (swi_master.docx) Download 843.03 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 27 November 2024 Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Collection European Journal of Neuroscience Keywords motor control motor imagery size weight illusion skill acquisition Authors Affiliations Jack Solomon 0000-0001-9956-2916 Simon Fraser University View all articles by this author Ernest Ng 0000-0001-5917-5735 Dalhousie University View all articles by this author David Westwood 0000-0003-3317-0447 Dalhousie University View all articles by this author Shaun Boe 0000-0001-7477-0049 [email protected] Dalhousie University View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 321 views 220 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Jack Solomon, Ernest Ng, David Westwood, et al. Independence of Perceptual and Motor Processes in Motor Imagery. Authorea . 27 November 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.173268570.08270535/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.173268570.08270535/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a028ddab49e6df88',t:'MTc3OTkyNTIzOQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00