Proactive Coral Reef Restoration Using Thermally Tolerant Corals in Hawai‘i

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,854 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Effective conservation of degraded ecosystems requires mitigation of the original cause of decline, but this step can be difficult in the context of global climate change. On coral reefs, persistent environmental stress which causes coral bleaching may be addressed by using coral restoration stock which is naturally more resilient, often termed “proactive restoration” in terrestrial management. To explore the feasibility and consequences of this approach, we outplanted 391 colonies of 7 species of reef-building coral designated as ‘thermally tolerant’ or ‘thermally sensitive’ during stress testing and monitored them for 2 years using photogrammetry to evaluate tradeoffs and return-on-effort. We found no growth, complexity or effort tradeoffs when using thermally tolerant corals, but tolerant corals had lower survivorship during our monitoring period, driven primarily by one genus. These data illustrate nuanced tradeoffs and consequences to proactive reef restoration and suggest that the potential benefits of this approach may only be fully realized during future coral bleaching events. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Author Contacts: Hanalei Ho‘opai-Sylva: hanaleih{at}hawaii.edu Carlo Caruso: carloreef{at}gmail.com Spencer Miller: millersp{at}hawaii.edu Joshua R. Hancock: hancock9{at}hawaii.edu Matthew Parry: matthew_parry{at}fws.gov Kira Hughes: kirawa{at}hawaii.edu Crawford drury: druryc{at}hawaii.edu.edu Data Availability Statement All data and code needed to reproduce this analysis is available at github.com/CarloReef/RWR_Airport Conflict of Interest Statement The authors declare no conflict of interest. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00