Results
We detected 89 VOCs primarily emitted from deadwood bundles across the different treatments and tree species. Of these, most peaks were sesquiterpenes (25%) and monoterpenes (22%), followed by hydrocarbons (14%), alcohols (9%), and unidentified compounds (9%). Less represented classes included aldehydes (5%), fatty acids (4%), ethers, ketones, and lactones (each 2%), while disulfides, esters, and furfural were each represented by a single peak. In total, 41 peaks were tentatively identified at the substance level (Appendix S1: Table S3).
Within two years, we reared 134 species of saproxylic beetles (24,696 individuals) from the bundles, with Curculionidae being the most abundant and species-rich family (13,200 individuals across 25 species). The most abundant species were Xylosandrus germanus (5091 individuals), Ernobius mollis (3397), Anthaxia quadripunctata (3231), Scolytus intricatus (2668), and Taphrorychus bicolor (1468).
3.1 VOC composition
We found significant effects of tree species (expl. var. = 16.85%, pseudo-F = 27.43, p = 0.001), treatment (expl. var. = 1.59%, pseudo-F = 1.94, p = 0.001), their interaction (expl. var. = 3.26%, pseudo-F = 1.32, p = 0.003), and exposure (expl. var. = 0.70%, pseudo-F = 3.42, p = 0.001) on the VOC composition (Fig. 2). CCA revealed that VOC collected from deadwood bundles clustered according to broadleaf and conifer tree species, with a clear separation between spruce and pine bundles, but not by treatment (Fig. 2). Heatmaps showed that the relative abundance of VOC composition varied across tree species in response to the applied treatments (Fig. 3). Among the selected peaks, spruce emitted the fewest VOCs compared to other tree species. In conifer bundles, we observed a shift in the relative VOC composition: monoterpenes were more abundant in control bundles, whereas sesquiterpenes emissions increased in fungi-inoculated bundles. In broadleaf bundles, heatmaps indicated increased sesquiterpene emissions in fungi-depleted and fungi-inoculated treatments compared to controls.
3.2 Indicator beetle species
The Indicator Species Analysis identified 45 saproxylic beetle species associated with tree species and 14 associated with treatments (Appendix S3). In our dataset, most beetle species exhibited a preference for a specific tree species. Oak and spruce supported the highest number of beetle species, with 12 and 6 species, respectively. Regarding treatments, Xylosandrus germanus and Synchita mediolanensis mainly occurred in fungi-depleted and inoculated bundles, while Leiopus nebulosus and Orthoperus atomus showed a preference for manipulated bundles (fungi-depleted, burned, or fungi-inoculated). Additionally, Bitoma crenata and Cryptophagus scanicus showed a weak but significant association with brown-rot-inoculated and burned bundles, respectively.
3.3 VOCs – Beetle associations
We displayed indicator beetle species and VOC peaks in NMDS ordination space to explore their relationship (Fig. 4). Out of the 42 VOC peaks significantly associated with the ordination axes, 18 showed associations at the species level, seven with pine, five with beech, four with spruce, and two with oak. In cases where differences between species within a tree type (e.g., beech or oak and pine or spruce) were not significant, peaks were broadly categorised by tree type. Based on this grouping, 17 peaks were associated with broadleaf trees and two with conifers. Five peaks did not show any specific tree association. Beetles and VOC peaks clustered by tree species (Fig. 4a), with broadleaf-, beech-, and oak-associated peaks aligning with higher abundances of broadleaf-associated beetles; additionally, peaks characteristic of conifers were associated with increased abundances of spruce- and pine-associated beetles. Regarding treatments, eight peaks were linked to fungi-depleted bundles, two to control, and one each to white rot and burned treatments. None were associated with brown rot, and 30 had no treatment association. Beetles and peaks did not cluster clearly by treatment (Fig. 4b). An exception was the ambrosia beetle X. germanus, which was associated with fungi-depleted bundles as well as with some peaks characteristic of this treatment. The burned-associated peak pointed towards Cryptophagus scanicus, an indicator for burned bundles.
Our study offers a novel field-based approach combining VOC sampling of deadwood with insect rearing of saproxylic species to investigate chemically mediated colonisation processes in deadwood. We show that VOC composition varies across host tree species and, to a lesser extent, across treatments, and that these chemical differences are associated with distinct saproxylic beetle assemblages. This highlights the potential ecological relevance of host-specific volatile cues during the early stages of deadwood colonisation for saproxylic beetle communities.
4.1 Tree species variation in VOCs composition
As hypothesised, tree species accounted for most of the variation in VOC composition (Fig. 2). The distinct chemical profiles between conifers and broadleaves likely reflect differences in wood anatomy and stress-response strategies. Conifers store terpene-rich oleoresin in specialised structures (resin ducts, glands), which release volatiles like monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes upon damage (Franceschi et al., 2005; Raffa, 2014; Celedon & Bohlmann, 2019). In contrast, broadleaf species lack such resin-containing structures and therefore exhibit lower terpene emissions upon physical damage (Holighaus & Schulz, 2006; Thakeow et al., 2007). We observed a distinct VOC composition between spruce and pine bundles (Fig. 2), with pine emitting both a greater number of VOCs and higher levels of monoterpenes in control bundles. These differences likely reflect their contrasting defence strategies: pine relies more on constitutive defences, storing large amounts of resin in preformed ducts, while spruce depends more on induced responses involving de novo synthesis of terpenoids and phenolics (Franceschi et al., 2005; Zhao et al., 2011; Celedón & Bohlmann, 2019). Since VOCs were collected from deadwood, where induced responses are inactive, the stronger emissions from pine likely result from its larger stored resin reserves, whereas spruce’s reliance on inducible pathways may explain its lower VOC emissions.
4.2 Fungal colonisation influences VOC composition
The breakdown of wood tissues during fungal colonisation releases a wide array of VOCs (Mäki et al., 2021). In our design, we minimised the a priori fungal presence through sterilisation and used fungi-depleted bundles as controls to isolate the effect of inoculation from sterilisation. Although the variation explained by our manipulated deadwood (inoculation, fungi-depletion, and burning) was low, it significantly influenced VOC composition.
We observed higher relative abundances of monoterpenes in pine control bundles compared to those that were fungi-depleted, inoculated, or burned (Fig. 3). High monoterpene levels in freshly cut logs are expected in conifers, due to the passive release of oleoresin after cutting (Franceschi et al., 2005; Isidorov et al., 2010). Interestingly, this pattern was not observed in spruce bundles, which aligns with findings by Mäki et al. (2021), who reported that monoterpene emissions peak earlier in pine sawdust but later in spruce. However, we found no increase in monoterpene emissions following inoculation in conifers (Fig. 3), suggesting that fungal colonisation did not enhance oleoresin release, possibly due to limited release or rapid degradation of monoterpenes. Alternatively, the heat during the sterilisation and burning process influenced the monoterpenes’ emissions.
Contrary to conifers, beech and oak do not store monoterpenes-rich oleoresin, but rely on tannins and phenolic compounds in their bark as a defence against biotic attacks (Dübeler et al., 1997; Mämmelä, 2001). Fungal degradation of wood in these species is therefore more likely to produce derivatives of these compounds rather than increase monoterpene emissions. In our study, such compounds were indeed detected, including orcinol, thymol, and cymeneol. Their presence, particularly in fungi-inoculated bundles, suggests that fungal activity can enhance the emission of phenolic volatiles, with a stronger effect observed in beech than in oak (Fig. 3).
Sesquiterpene emissions in deadwood are linked to fungal degradation, as observed under laboratory conditions, in pine (Mäki et al., 2021), spruce (Mali et al., 2019), and beech (Holighaus & Schütz, 2006; El Ariebi et al., 2016). In our study, fungi-inoculated bundles in conifers showed higher relative abundances of sesquiterpenes compared to fungi-depleted ones (Fig. 3). However, this pattern was not observed in broadleaf bundles, where differences appeared mainly between control and fungi-depleted bundles. This contrast likely reflects differences in fungal colonisation processes and substrate properties between conifers and broadleaves. In conifer wood, fungal colonisation is generally slower than in broadleaf due to higher lignin content, C:N ratio, and resinous structures (Cornwell et al., 2009). This might explain the relatively low sesquiterpene emissions in fungi-depleted bundles. In contrast, broadleaf wood is more easily colonised due to lower lignin content, allowing environmental fungi to rapidly colonise fungi-depleted bundles. This likely led to similar levels of fungal activity and sesquiterpene emissions in both inoculated and fungi-depleted bundles.
4.3 VOCs and beetle responses to burned wood
The burning process alters wood’s structure, texture, and chemical properties, releasing odour cues that are ecologically relevant to pyrophilous beetles across local and landscape scales (Allison et al., 2004; Ramberg et al., 2025). Some of these VOCs (e.g., guaiacol, 5-methylfurfural) act as chemical cues of burned wood for pyrophilous species of longhorn and woodboring beetles. However, on burned bundles, we detected neither pyrophilous beetles nor VOCs typically associated with thermal degradation of cellulose and lignin (Oasmaa et al., 2003; Karagöz et al., 2005), likely due to the two-month delay between the burning event and VOC sampling. Additionally, the amount of burned wood in our experiment was limited and highly fragmented, which may have further reduced its detectability by pyrophilous beetles that rely on long-range chemical cues to locate large-scale fires (Paczkowski et al., 2013) rather than isolated burned logs. In contrast, we detected Cryptophagus scanicus, a silken fungus beetle, which associated with burned bundles and an unidentified hydrocarbon (Fig. 4b). This finding suggests a potential case of priority effects, where early fungal colonisers during the degradation of deadwood may have produced volatiles that attracted this species.
4.4 VOC beetle association
In the present study, we found that saproxylic beetle communities were associated with VOC profiles of their host trees. Beetle assemblages from spruce and pine occurred in deadwood with higher relative abundances of conifer-associated volatiles (i.e., α-pinene, verbenol), while assemblages from beech and oak were associated with broadleaf-associated volatiles (i.e., sativene, β-copaene) (Fig. 4a). Moreover, the composition of VOC profiles differed markedly between coniferous and broadleaf species: broadleaf bundles emitted a greater diversity of compound classes, predominantly sesquiterpenes, whereas monoterpenes dominated conifer bundles. The distinct separation of beetle communities based on host tree volatiles is particularly striking given the complexity of natural environments, where overlapping odours create a complex mixture of ambient chemical cues. These findings suggest that saproxylic beetles can detect and respond to either a single volatile or blends to locate suitable deadwood for feeding or oviposition.
One distinct cluster of beetles emerging from conifer bundles was dominated by bark beetles and by the predatory species Nemozoma elongatum . This cluster was associated with high relative abundances of conifer volatiles such as α-pinene (P109), β-pinene (P132), limonene (P158), verbenone (P243), carene (P148), and terpineol (P229) (Fig. 4a). Several of these monoterpenes are well-known semiochemicals for bark beetles, involved in host location and aggregation (Byers, 1989; López et al., 2013; Sánchez-Osorio et al., 2021), acting as cues. The co-occurrence of N. elongatum with bark beetles is likely driven by the presence of its primary prey, Pityogenes chalcographus, whose aggregation pheromone, chalcogran, is used by N. elongatum as a kairomonal cue for prey detection (Heuer & Vité, 1984).
The second cluster, comprised of jewel beetles, longhorn beetles, and the bark beetle Magdalis violacea, linked to cymeneol (P234), longifolene (P318), caryophyllene oxide (P380), and an unidentified compound. Longifolene has been suggested as a potential attractant for Monochamus galloprovincialis (Szmigielski et al., 2012), especially when coupled with other common host volatiles (i.e., limonene, α-pinene) (Pajares et al., 2004). In our study, the few individuals detected in a single bundle did not allow us to include M. galloprovincialis in our analysis.
Nevertheless, our results suggest that longifolene may serve as a host colonisation cue for other longhorn beetles. For jewel beetles, these associations are reported here for the first time, and further experimental studies are needed to determine whether and how these species detect and respond to these compounds.
A third cluster, including p-cymenene (P187), trans-verbenol (P216), and two unidentified compounds, was not associated with any beetle species in our dataset. Du et al. (2025) reported that under intense bark beetle pressure, emissions of p-cymenene and other aromatic compounds increased in spruce logs before beetle emergence, likely as part of an induced defence response from the logs. This may suggest a deterrent role for these compounds in shaping local beetle assemblages.
Among the broadleaf-associated beetles, the ambrosia beetle Xylosandrus germanus was associated with a group of VOCs that comprises 1-ethyl-3-methylbenzene (P123) and three unidentified sesquiterpenes from oak. This ambrosia beetle is known to respond to VOCs emitted by its symbiotic fungus Ambrosiella grosmanniae and other fungal sources under bioassay experiments (Mayers et al., 2015; Gugliuzzo et al., 2023). This aligns with our findings, as we recorded thousands of individuals emerging from both fungi-inoculated and fungi-depleted bundles (colonised by pioneer fungi), suggesting that it relies on fungal decay cues to locate and colonise weakened or dead wood in the field.
The second cluster, consisting of a broad range of beetles, including two beech bark beetles, two oak-associated longhorns Synchita mediolanensis (Zopheridae) and Crypturgus dentatus (Cryptophagidae), and Litargus connexus (Mycetophagidae), was linked to a monoterpene emitted by both oak and beech and a sesquiterpene associated with beech. While their host preferences are consistent with our results, the chemical cues involved in host localisation remain largely unknown. In our study, broadleaf-associated beetles were generally linked to sesquiterpenes (Fig. 4a), a pattern consistent with previous findings (Fäldt et al., 1999; McLeod et al., 2005; Leather et al., 2014). Interestingly, the beech bark beetles, Taphrorychus bicolor and Ernoporicus fagi, were associated with an unidentified sesquiterpene predominantly emitted from fungi-colonised beech bundles. This association may indicate the use of specific chemical cues to locate early-decay beech substrates.
The third cluster included unidentified sesquiterpenes associated with broadleaf and beech. In our study, this cluster was not linked to any of the beetle species sampled, although these compounds may serve as cues for other species that were either absent or underrepresented in our dataset.
The fourth cluster had a composition similar to the third, consisting of unidentified sesquiterpenes, but was linked to oak- or broadleaf-associated beetles from several families. These compounds may function as general olfactory cues for saproxylic beetles across different families when locating broadleaf deadwood. The only tentatively identified compounds were sativene (P315) and β-copaene (P326), known to be emitted by the brown-rot fungus Fomitopsis pinicola (Rösecke et al., 2000), which was used to inoculate a subset of bundles. Although these compounds were more abundant on beech deadwood, we observed a non-significant trend toward higher abundance in brown-rot inoculated bundles compared to white-rot. We suggest that small amounts of these volatiles may serve as host colonisation cues by Bitoma crenata, a cylindrical bark beetle associated with brown-rot bundles in our study, suggesting a potential role of priority effects, where early fungal colonisers shape subsequent beetle assemblages through the emission of chemical cues linked to deadwood degradation. Although experimental validation is needed to confirm whether these compounds are detected and behaviourally relevant to beetles, considering aspects like blend composition and concentration, our findings highlight the ecological relevance of VOCs in the colonisation of deadwood by saproxylic beetles.
References
Allison, J. D., Borden, J. H., & Seybold, S. J. (2004). A review of the chemical ecology of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera). CHEMOECOLOGY, 14 (3), 123–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00049-004-0277-1Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01Birkemoe, T., Jacobsen, R. M., Sverdrup-Thygeson, A., & Biedermann, P. H. W. (2018). Insect-Fungus Interactions in Dead Wood Systems. In M. D. Ulyshen (Ed.), Saproxylic Insects (Vol. 1, pp. 377–427). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75937-1_12Bruce, T. J. A., Wadhams, L. J., & Woodcock, C. M. (2005). Insect host location: A volatile situation. Trends in Plant Science, 10 (6), 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2005.04.003Bussler, H., Bouget, C., Brustel, H., Brändle, M., Riedinger, V., Brandl, R., & Müller, J. (2011). Abundance and pest classification of scolytid species (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) follow different patterns. Forest Ecology and Management, 262 (9), 1887–1894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.08.011Byers, J. A. (1989). Chemical ecology of bark beetles. Experientia, 45 (3), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01951813Cáceres, M. D., & Legendre, P. (2009). Associations between species and groups of sites: Indices and statistical inference. Ecology, 90 (12), 3566–3574. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1823.1Cavaletto, G., Faccoli, M., Marini, L., Spaethe, J., Magnani, G., & Rassati, D. (2020). Effect of Trap Color on Captures of Bark- and Wood-Boring Beetles (Coleoptera; Buprestidae and Scolytinae) and Associated Predators. Insects, 11 (11), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11110749Celedon, J. M., & Bohlmann, J. (2019). Oleoresin defenses in conifers: Chemical diversity, terpene synthases and limitations of oleoresin defense under climate change. New Phytologist, 224 (4), 1444–1463. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15984Cornwell, W. K., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Allison, S. D., Bauhus, J., Eggleton, P., Preston, C. M., Scarff, F., Weedon, J. T., Wirth, C., & Zanne, A. E. (2009). Plant traits and wood fates across the globe: Rotted, burned, or consumed? Global Change Biology, 15 (10), 2431–2449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01916.xDu, B., Frühbrodt, T., Delb, H., Burzlaff, T., Biedermann, P. H. W., & Kreuzwieser, J. (2025). Emission patterns of volatile organic compounds from Norway spruce logs following bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) infestation. Tree Physiology, 45 (1), tpae152. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpae152Dübeler, A., Voltmer, G., Gora, V., Lunderstädt, J., & Zeeck, A. (1997). Phenols from Fagus sylvatica and their role in defence against Cryptococcus fagisuga . Phytochemistry, 45 (1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(96)00771-6Dufrêne, M., & Legendre, P. (1997). Species Assemblages and Indicator Species: The Need for a Flexible Asymmetrical Approach. Ecological Monographs, 67 (3), 345–366. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0345:SAAIST]2.0.CO;2El Ariebi, N., Hiscox, J., Scriven, S. A., Müller, C. T., & Boddy, L. (2016). Production and effects of volatile organic compounds during interspecific interactions. Fungal Ecology, 20, 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2015.12.013Evans, J. A., Eyre, C. A., Rogers, H. J., Boddy, L., & Müller, C. T. (2008). Changes in volatile production during interspecific interactions between four wood rotting fungi growing in artificial media. Fungal Ecology, 1 (2), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2008.06.001Fäldt, J., Jonsell, M., Nordlander, G., & Borg-Karlson, A.-K. (1999). Volatiles of Bracket Fungi Fomitopsis pinicola and Fomes fomentarius and Their Functions as Insect Attractants. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 25 (3), 567–590. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020958005023Fraenkel, G. S. (1959). The Raison d’Être of Secondary Plant Substances. Science, 129 (3361), 1466–1470. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.129.3361.1466Franceschi, V. R., Krokene, P., Christiansen, E., & Krekling, T. (2005). Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytologist, 167 (2), 353–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01436.xFraser, A. M., Mechaber, W. L., & Hildebrand, J. G. (2003). Electroantennographic and Behavioral Responses of the Sphinx Moth Manduca sexta to Host Plant Headspace Volatiles. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 29 (8), 1813–1833. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024898127549Fukasawa, Y. (2021). Ecological impacts of fungal wood decay types: A review of current knowledge and future research directions. Ecological Research, 36 (6), 910–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.12260Grove, S. J. (2002). Saproxylic Insect Ecology and the Sustainable Management of Forests. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 33 (Volume 33, 2002), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150507Gugliuzzo, A., Kreuzwieser, J., Ranger, C. M., Tropea Garzia, G., Biondi, A., & Biedermann, P. H. W. (2023). Volatiles of fungal cultivars act as cues for host-selection in the fungus-farming ambrosia beetle Xylosandrus germanus . Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, 1151078. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1151078Hartikainen, A., Yli-Pirilä, P., Tiitta, P., Leskinen, A., Kortelainen, M., Orasche, J., Schnelle-Kreis, J., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Zimmermann, R., Jokiniemi, J., & Sippula, O. (2018). Volatile Organic Compounds from Logwood Combustion: Emissions and Transformation under Dark and Photochemical Aging Conditions in a Smog Chamber. Environmental Science & Technology, 52 (8), 4979–4988. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06269Heuer, H. G., & Vité, J. P. (1984). Chalcogran: Unique kairomone-governed predator-prey relations among ostomid and solytid beetles. Naturwissenschaften, 71 (4), 214–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00490438Holighaus, G., & Schütz, S. (2006). Odours of wood decay as semiochemicals for Trypodendron domesticum L. (Col., Scolytidae) .Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P. (2008). Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models. Biometrical Journal, 50 (3), 346–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200810425Hulcr, J., Mann, R., & Stelinski, L. L. (2011). The Scent of a Partner: Ambrosia Beetles Are Attracted to Volatiles from Their Fungal Symbionts. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 37 (12), 1374–1377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-011-0046-xIsidorov, V. A., Smolewska, M., Purzyńska-Pugacewicz, A., & Tyszkiewicz, Z. (2010). Chemical composition of volatile and extractive compounds of pine and spruce leaf litter in the initial stages of decomposition. Biogeosciences, 7 (9), 2785–2794. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2785-2010Johansson, T., Olsson, J., Hjältén, J., Jonsson, B. G., & Ericson, L. (2006). Beetle attraction to sporocarps and wood infected with mycelia of decay fungi in old-growth spruce forests of northern Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management, 237 (1–3), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.056Jonsell, M., & Nordlander, G. (1995). Field attraction of Coleoptera to odours of the wood-decaying polypores Fomitopsis pinicola and Fomes fomentarius . Annales Zoologici Fennici, 32 (4), 391–402. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23735545Karagöz, S., Bhaskar, T., Muto, A., & Sakata, Y. (2005). Comparative studies of oil compositions produced from sawdust, rice husk, lignin and cellulose by hydrothermal treatment. Fuel, 84 (7), 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2005.01.004Kupferschmid Albisetti, A. D., Brang, P., Schönenberger, W., & Bugmann, H. (2003). Decay of Picea abies snag stands on steep mountain slopes. The Forestry Chronicle, 79 (2), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc79247-2Leather, S. R., Baumgart, E. A., Evans, H. F., & Quicke, D. L. J. (2014). Seeing the trees for the wood – beech ( Fagus sylvatica ) decay fungal volatiles influence the structure of saproxylic beetle communities. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 7 (4), 314–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12055López, S., Quero, C., Iturrondobeitia, J. C., Guerrero, Á., & Goldarazena, A. (2013). Electrophysiological and behavioural responses of Pityophthorus pubescens (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) to ()-α-farnesene, ()-(+)-limonene and ()-(−)-verbenone in (Pinaceae) stands in northern Spain. Pest Management Science, 69 (1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3359Mäki, M., Mali, T., Hellén, H., Heinonsalo, J., Lundell, T., & Bäck, J. (2021). Deadwood substrate and species-species interactions determine the release of volatile organic compounds by wood-decaying fungi. Fungal Ecology, 54, 101106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2021.101106Mali, T., Mäki, M., Hellén, H., Heinonsalo, J., Bäck, J., & Lundell, T. (2019). Decomposition of spruce wood and release of volatile organic compounds depend on decay type, fungal interactions and enzyme production patterns. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 95 (9), fiz135. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiz135Mämmelä, P. (2001). Phenolics in selected European hardwood species by liquid chromatography–electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry. Analyst, 126 (9), 1535–1538. https://doi.org/10.1039/B104584AMayers, C. G., McNew, D. L., Harrington, T. C., Roeper, R. A., Fraedrich, S. W., Biedermann, P. H. W., Castrillo, L. A., & Reed, S. E. (2015). Three genera in the Ceratocystidaceae are the respective symbionts of three independent lineages of ambrosia beetles with large, complex mycangia. Fungal Biology, 119 (11), 1075–1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2015.08.002McLeod, G., Gries, R., von Reuß, S. H., Rahe, J. E., McIntosh, R., König, W. A., & Gries, G. (2005). The pathogen causing Dutch elm disease makes host trees attract insect vectors. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272 (1580), 2499–2503. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3202Miller, D. R. (2006). Ethanol and (−)-α-Pinene: Attractant Kairomones for Some Large Wood-Boring Beetles in Southeastern USA. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 32 (4), 779–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-006-9037-8Nottingham, S. F., Hardie, J., Dawson, G. W., Hick, A. J., Pickett, J. A., Wadhams, L. J., & Woodcock, C. M. (1991). Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of Aphids to host and nonhost plant volatiles. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 17 (6), 1231–1242. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01402946Oasmaa, A., Kuoppala, E., & Solantausta, Y. (2003). Fast Pyrolysis of Forestry Residue. 2. Physicochemical Composition of Product Liquid. Energy & Fuels, 17 (2), 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef020206gOksanen, J., Simpson, G. L., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O’Hara, R. B., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., Szoecs, E., Wagner, H., Barbour, M., Bedward, M., Bolker, B., Borcard, D., Carvalho, G., Chirico, M., De Caceres, M., Durand, S., … Weedon, J. (2001). vegan: Community Ecology Package (p. 2.6-8) [Dataset]. https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.veganOrban, A., Schwab, L. J., Lugones, L. G., Wösten, H. A. B., & Rühl, M. (2023). Effect of fruiting-related genes on the formation of volatile organic compounds in the mushroom Schizophyllum commune . Mycological Progress, 22 (9), 67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-023-01914-4Paczkowski, S., Paczkowska, M., Dippel, S., Schulze, N., Schütz, S., Sauerwald, T., Weiß, A., Bauer, M., Gottschald, J., & Kohl, C.-D. (2013). The olfaction of a fire beetle leads to new concepts for early fire warning systems. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 183, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2013.03.123Paiva, N. L. (2000). An Introduction to the Biosynthesis of Chemicals Used in Plant-Microbe Communication. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 19 (2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003440000016Pajares, J. A., Ibeas, F., Díez, J. J., & Gallego, D. (2004). Attractive responses by Monochamus galloprovincialis (Col., Cerambycidae) to host and bark beetle semiochemicals. Journal of Applied Entomology, 128 (9–10), 633–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2004.00899.xPichler, V., Homolák, M., Skierucha, W., Pichlerová, M., Ramírez, D., Gregor, J., & Jaloviar, P. (2012). Variability of moisture in coarse woody debris from several ecologically important tree species of the Temperate Zone of Europe. Ecohydrology, 5 (4), 424–434. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.235Raffa, K. F. (2014). Terpenes tell different tales at different scales: Glimpses into the Chemical Ecology of conifer - bark beetle - microbial interactions. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 40 (1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-013-0368-yRamberg, E., Strengbom, J., Wikars, L.-O., & Ranius, T. (2025). Surrounding landscape composition influences saproxylic beetle assemblages after prescribed burning. Journal of Applied Ecology, n/a (n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70084Rösecke, J., Pietsch, M., & König, W. A. (2000). Volatile constituents of wood-rotting basidiomycetes. Phytochemistry, 54 (8), 747–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00138-2Sánchez-Osorio, I., Tapias, R., Domínguez, L., López-Pantoja, G., & González, M. del M. (2021). Electroantennographic Responses of Cerambyx welensii Küster to Host-Related Volatiles. Forests, 12 (9), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12091168Seibold, S., Brandl, R., Buse, J., Hothorn, T., Schmidl, J., Thorn, S., & Müller, J. (2015). Association of extinction risk of saproxylic beetles with ecological degradation of forests in Europe. Conservation Biology, 29 (2), 382–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12427Seibold, S., Müller, J., Allner, S., Willner, M., Baldrian, P., Ulyshen, M. D., Brandl, R., Bässler, C., Hagge, J., & Mitesser, O. (2022). Quantifying wood decomposition by insects and fungi using computed tomography scanning and machine learning. Scientific Reports, 12 (1), 16150. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20377-3Seibold, S., Weisser, W. W., Ambarlı, D., Gossner, M. M., Mori, A. S., Cadotte, M. W., Hagge, J., Bässler, C., & Thorn, S. (2023). Drivers of community assembly change during succession in wood‐decomposing beetle communities. Journal of Animal Ecology, 92 (5), 965–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13843Seybold, S. J., Huber, D. P. W., Lee, J. C., Graves, A. D., & Bohlmann, J. (2006). Pine monoterpenes and pine bark beetles: A marriage of convenience for defense and chemical communication. Phytochemistry Reviews, 5 (1), 143–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-006-9002-8Suckling, D. M., Gibb, A. R., Daly, J. M., Chen, X., & Brockerhoff, E. G. (2001). Behavioral and Electrophysiological Responses of Arhopalus tristis to Burnt Pine and Other Stimuli. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 27 (6), 1091–1104. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010355710509Szmigielski, R., Cieslak, M., Rudziński, K. J., & Maciejewska, B. (2012). Identification of volatiles from Pinus silvestris attractive for Monochamus galloprovincialis using a SPME-GC/MS platform. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 19 (7), 2860–2869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-0792-5Ulyshen, M., & Hanula, J. (2010). Patterns of saproxylic beetle succession in loblolly pine. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 12: 187-194, 12, 187–194. https://research.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/34896Visser, J. H., & Avé, D. A. (1978). General Green Leaf Volatiles in the Olfactory Orientation of the Colorado Beetle, Leptinotarsa Decemlineata . Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 24 (3), 738–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1978.tb02838.xVuts, J., Woodcock, C. M., Sumner, M. E., Caulfield, J. C., Reed, K., Inward, D. J., Leather, S. R., Pickett, J. A., Birkett, M. A., & Denman, S. (2016). Responses of the two-spotted oak buprestid, Agrilus biguttatus (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), to host tree volatiles. Pest Management Science, 72 (4), 845–851. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4208Wickham, H. (2016). Data Analysis. In H. Wickham, Ggplot2 (pp. 189–201). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_9
Figures
Fig. 1 Ten study sites distributed across Germany and the Czech Republic (a). Each site consisted of two plots (shady, sun-exposed), each with 20 bundles (combinations of four tree species and five treatments) (b). VOCs were collected from each bundle during July 2022 after the bundles had been wrapped for 45 minutes to concentrate the volatiles, followed by a 15-minute collection period (c).
Fig. 2 Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) of VOC composition from deadwood bundles. The first two axes explain significantly (*** = p<0.005) 39.5% of the variation. Model-selected peaks (n = 89) were used as response variables; predictors included tree species, treatment, their interaction, and exposure. Bar plots show the variance explained by each predictor. Colours indicate tree species; shapes indicate treatments.
Fig. 3 The heatmap showing the average relative VOC composition across tree species and treatment combinations. Peaks are colour-coded by chemical class, with a gradient indicating the level of VOC emissions. Darker colours represent higher emissions, while lighter colours correspond to lower emissions. Grey indicates missing VOCs.
Fig. 4 NMDS plots showing associations between VOC peaks and saproxylic beetles by (a) tree species and (b) treatments. Dots represent indicator beetles (n = 40), colour-coded by substrate preference. Grey dots and arrows stand for no preferences from the LMM. Arrows indicate significant VOC peaks (n = 42); their direction indicates positive associations with beetle species (dots) positioned in front of them. Only VOC peaks identified at the substance level are labelled; the full list is available in Appendix S3. Arrow lengths are standardised to unit vectors, not showing effect size (R 2 ). The same colour was used for beetles and VOCs associated with the respective tree species (a) or treatment (b). “Manipulated” includes beetles attracted to all treatments except the control. Beetle illustrations by Michaela Helclová.
Information & Authors
Information
Version history
Peer review timeline
Published
Oecologia
Version of Record26 Feb 2026Published
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License.