Predicting Upper-Extremity Function Recovery From Kinematics in Stroke Patients Following Goal-Oriented Computer-Based Training

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14

This study developed a multivariate regression model using kinematic data from stroke patients undergoing computer-based training to predict clinical upper-extremity function scores with comparable accuracy across different scales.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14 · read from full text

The paper studies whether kinematic data collected during unsupervised, goal-oriented computer-based upper-limb training after stroke can be used to automatically predict clinical function scores, using multivariate regression trained on 98 stroke patients with 191 total Rehabilitation Gaming System (RGS) sessions. Participants intercepted virtual spheres in a 3D first-person display, while RGS used image-based motion capture and feedback to restrict compensatory trunk movements; the model predicted Fugl-Meyer upper-extremity (FM-UE) scores with R² = 0.38 (σ = 12.8) and showed test-retest reliability (r = 0.89), sensitivity to clinical improvements (95% true positive rate), and generalisation to related planar reaching tasks (R² = 0.39), with comparable performance for CAHAI (R² = 0.40) and Barthel Index (R² = 0.35). The reported limitation/caveat is that predictive accuracy is moderate rather than high, as reflected by the R² values. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Background: After a stroke, a wide range of deficits can occur with varying onset latencies. As a result, predicting impairment and recovery are enormous challenges in neurorehabilitation. Body function and structure, as well as activities, are assessed using clinical scales. For functional deficits of the upper extremities these include the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Upper Extremity (FM-UE), the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI) and Barthel Index (BI), administered by clinicians. Although these scales are generally accepted for the evaluation of the motor and functional impairment of the upper-limbs, they are time-consuming, show high inter-rater variability, have low ecological validity, and are vulnerable to biases introduced by compensatory movements and action modifications. For these reasons, alternative methods need to be developed for efficient and objective assessment. Computer-based motion capture and classification tools have the potential to collect and process kinematic data to estimate impairment, function and recovery while overcoming these limitations. Methods: We present a method for estimating clinical scores from movement parameters that are entirely extracted from kinematic data recorded during unsupervised rehabilitation sessions performed with the Rehabilitation Gaming System (RGS). RGS is a rehabilitation technology that uses image-based motion capture, goal-oriented individualised training, virtual reality content delivery, and restricts compensatory trunk movements through feedback. The main protocol considered in this study asks patients to use their upper limbs to intercept spheres that are presented in a 3 dimensional virtual reality display. RGS maps the planar physical arm movements onto matching movements by an avatar presented in a first-person perspective. In this analysis, we performed a multivariate regression using clinical data from 98 stroke patients who completed a total of 191 sessions with RGS. Results: Our multivariate regression model reaches an accuracy of R2 : 0.38, with an error (σ : 12.8), in predicting FM-UE scores. We analyse our model by assessing reliability (r = 0:89 for test-retest), sensitivity to clinical improvements (95% true positive rate) and generalisation to other tasks that involve planar reaching movements (R2 : 0.39). The model achieves comparable accuracy also for the CAHAI (R2 : 0.40) and BI scales (R2 : 0.35). Conclusions: Our results highlight the clinically relevant predictive power of kinematic data collected during unsupervised goal-oriented motor training combined with automated inference techniques and provide new insight into factors underlying recovery and its biomarkers.
Full text 17,711 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Predicting Upper-Extremity Function Recovery From Kinematics in Stroke Patients Following Goal-Oriented Computer-Based Training | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Predicting Upper-Extremity Function Recovery From Kinematics in Stroke Patients Following Goal-Oriented Computer-Based Training Fabrizio Antenucci, Belén Rubio Ballester, Martina Maier, Anthony C.C. Coolen, and 1 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-591866/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 13 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background: After a stroke, a wide range of deficits can occur with varying onset latencies. As a result, predicting impairment and recovery are enormous challenges in neurorehabilitation. Body function and structure, as well as activities, are assessed using clinical scales. For functional deficits of the upper extremities these include the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Upper Extremity (FM-UE), the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI) and Barthel Index (BI), administered by clinicians. Although these scales are generally accepted for the evaluation of the motor and functional impairment of the upper-limbs, they are time-consuming, show high inter-rater variability, have low ecological validity, and are vulnerable to biases introduced by compensatory movements and action modifications. For these reasons, alternative methods need to be developed for efficient and objective assessment. Computer-based motion capture and classification tools have the potential to collect and process kinematic data to estimate impairment, function and recovery while overcoming these limitations. Methods: We present a method for estimating clinical scores from movement parameters that are entirely extracted from kinematic data recorded during unsupervised rehabilitation sessions performed with the Rehabilitation Gaming System (RGS). RGS is a rehabilitation technology that uses image-based motion capture, goal-oriented individualised training, virtual reality content delivery, and restricts compensatory trunk movements through feedback. The main protocol considered in this study asks patients to use their upper limbs to intercept spheres that are presented in a 3 dimensional virtual reality display. RGS maps the planar physical arm movements onto matching movements by an avatar presented in a first-person perspective. In this analysis, we performed a multivariate regression using clinical data from 98 stroke patients who completed a total of 191 sessions with RGS. Results: Our multivariate regression model reaches an accuracy of R 2 : 0.38, with an error (σ : 12.8), in predicting FM-UE scores. We analyse our model by assessing reliability (r = 0:89 for test-retest), sensitivity to clinical improvements (95% true positive rate) and generalisation to other tasks that involve planar reaching movements (R 2 : 0.39). The model achieves comparable accuracy also for the CAHAI (R 2 : 0.40) and BI scales (R 2 : 0.35). Conclusions: Our results highlight the clinically relevant predictive power of kinematic data collected during unsupervised goal-oriented motor training combined with automated inference techniques and provide new insight into factors underlying recovery and its biomarkers. Neurology Physical Medicine & Rehab Rehabilitation Stroke Interactive feedback Upper extremities Posture monitoring Motion sensing Motion classification Multivariate regression Full Text Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Major revision 09 Aug, 2021 Review # 3 received at journal 12 Jul, 2021 Review # 1 received at journal 27 Jun, 2021 Review # 2 received at journal 24 Jun, 2021 Reviewer # 3 agreed at journal 21 Jun, 2021 Reviewer # 2 agreed at journal 20 Jun, 2021 Reviews received at journal 11 Jun, 2021 Reviewer # 1 agreed at journal 11 Jun, 2021 Reviewers invited by journal 08 Jun, 2021 Editor assigned by journal 07 Jun, 2021 Submission checks completed at journal 06 Jun, 2021 Editor invited by journal 06 Jun, 2021 First submitted to journal 04 Jun, 2021 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-591866","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":32897435,"identity":"d0206e7d-0a8c-41f2-af90-8b82d24a55f0","order_by":0,"name":"Fabrizio Antenucci","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5070-7408","institution":"CNR: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Fabrizio","middleName":"","lastName":"Antenucci","suffix":""},{"id":32897436,"identity":"13559535-28b2-42e1-9d0e-fe594653a25d","order_by":1,"name":"Belén Rubio Ballester","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"IBEC: Institut de Bioenginyeria de Catalunya","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Belén","middleName":"Rubio","lastName":"Ballester","suffix":""},{"id":32897437,"identity":"8f349a51-124c-4958-b0d2-569fb264967b","order_by":2,"name":"Martina Maier","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"IBEC: Institut de Bioenginyeria de Catalunya","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Martina","middleName":"","lastName":"Maier","suffix":""},{"id":32897438,"identity":"73d9afcc-e316-4d0a-8558-3facb01bba49","order_by":3,"name":"Anthony C.C. Coolen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Anthony","middleName":"C.C.","lastName":"Coolen","suffix":""},{"id":32897439,"identity":"9e8d3ef6-6a4d-4142-8125-3386539c6317","order_by":4,"name":"Paul F. M. J. Verschure","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"IBEC: Institut de Bioenginyeria de Catalunya","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Paul","middleName":"F. M. J.","lastName":"Verschure","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2021-06-04 18:29:04","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-591866/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-591866/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":13647966,"identity":"bb69bceb-503f-4594-9648-3d73092743e8","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-09-17 09:30:43","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1760294,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"paperClinimetricslegacydata.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-591866/v1_covered.pdf"},{"id":10531024,"identity":"6c8a5f27-ae01-40f3-b5a9-0897928cf183","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-06-18 14:35:51","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1756804,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"paperClinimetricslegacydata.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-591866/v1_covered.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003ePredicting Upper-Extremity Function Recovery From Kinematics in Stroke Patients Following Goal-Oriented Computer-Based Training\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Full Text","content":"This preprint is available for \u003ca href='/article/rs-591866/latest.pdf' target='_blank'\u003edownload as a PDF\u003c/a\u003e."}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":true,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"journal-of-neuroengineering-and-rehabilitation","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"jner","sideBox":"Learn more about [Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation](http://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"12984","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/12984/3","title":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","twitterHandle":"@BioMedCentral","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Rehabilitation, Stroke, Interactive feedback, Upper extremities, Posture monitoring, Motion sensing, Motion classification, Multivariate regression","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-591866/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-591866/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eBackground: After a stroke, a wide range of deficits can occur with varying onset latencies. As a result, predicting impairment and recovery are enormous challenges in neurorehabilitation. Body function and structure, as well as activities, are assessed using clinical scales. For functional deficits of the upper extremities these include the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Upper Extremity (FM-UE), the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI) and Barthel Index (BI), administered by clinicians. Although these scales are generally accepted for the evaluation of the motor and functional impairment of the upper-limbs, they are time-consuming, show high inter-rater variability, have low ecological validity, and are vulnerable to biases introduced by compensatory movements and action modifications. For these reasons, alternative methods need to be developed for efficient and objective assessment. Computer-based motion capture and classification tools have the potential to collect and process kinematic data to estimate impairment, function and recovery while overcoming these limitations.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMethods: We present a method for estimating clinical scores from movement parameters that are entirely extracted from kinematic data recorded during unsupervised rehabilitation sessions performed with the Rehabilitation Gaming System (RGS). RGS is a rehabilitation technology that uses image-based motion capture, goal-oriented individualised training, virtual reality content delivery, and restricts compensatory trunk movements through feedback. The main protocol considered in this study asks patients to use their upper limbs to intercept spheres that are presented in a 3 dimensional virtual reality display. RGS maps the planar physical arm movements onto matching movements by an avatar presented in a first-person perspective. In this analysis, we performed a multivariate regression using clinical data from 98 stroke patients who completed a total of 191 sessions with RGS.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eResults: Our multivariate regression model reaches an accuracy of R\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e : 0.38, with an error (σ : 12.8), in predicting FM-UE scores. We analyse our model by assessing reliability (r = 0:89 for test-retest), sensitivity to clinical improvements (95% true positive rate) and generalisation to other tasks that involve planar reaching movements (R\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e : 0.39). The model achieves comparable accuracy also for the CAHAI (R\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e : 0.40) and BI scales (R\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e : 0.35).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eConclusions: Our results highlight the clinically relevant predictive power of kinematic data collected during unsupervised goal-oriented motor training combined with automated inference techniques and provide new insight into factors underlying recovery and its biomarkers.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Predicting Upper-Extremity Function Recovery From Kinematics in Stroke Patients Following Goal-Oriented Computer-Based Training","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2021-06-18 14:35:38","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-591866/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Major revision","date":"2021-08-10T00:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2021-07-13T00:00:00+00:00","index":3,"fulltext":"Recommendation: Reviewer's comments unavailable due to the journal's policy.\n"},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2021-06-28T00:00:00+00:00","index":1,"fulltext":"Recommendation: Reviewer's comments unavailable due to the journal's policy.\n"},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2021-06-25T00:00:00+00:00","index":2,"fulltext":"Recommendation: Reviewer's comments unavailable due to the journal's policy.\n"},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2021-06-22T00:00:00+00:00","index":3,"fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2021-06-21T00:00:00+00:00","index":2,"fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2021-06-12T00:00:00+00:00","index":0,"fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2021-06-12T00:00:00+00:00","index":1,"fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2021-06-09T00:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2021-06-07T04:58:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2021-06-06T23:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2021-06-06T23:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","date":"2021-06-04T11:46:42+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"journal-of-neuroengineering-and-rehabilitation","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"jner","sideBox":"Learn more about [Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation](http://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"12984","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/12984/3","title":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","twitterHandle":"@BioMedCentral","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"51c9e544-ea78-4ca8-bc12-e7cd4f3bfa90","owner":[],"postedDate":"June 18th, 2021","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[{"id":5114553,"name":"Neurology"},{"id":5114554,"name":"Physical Medicine \u0026 Rehab"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2021-12-14T08:55:18+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2021-06-18 14:35:38","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-591866","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-591866","identity":"rs-591866","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"_2-kVJe1T_tPrBINL-cwx","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00