Multi-omic subtypes of Alzheimer’s dementia are differentially associated with psychological traits

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Importance Psychological traits reflecting neuroticism, depressive symptoms, loneliness, and purpose in life are risk factors of AD dementia; however, the underlying biologic mechanisms of these associations remain largely unknown. Objective To examine whether one or more multi-omic brain molecular subtypes of AD is associated with neuroticism, depressive symptoms, loneliness, and/or purpose in life. Design Two cohort-based studies; Religious Orders Study (ROS) and Rush Memory and Aging Project (MAP), both ongoing longitudinal clinical pathological studies that began enrollment in 1994 and 1997. Setting Older priests, nuns, and brothers from across the U.S. (ROS) and older adults from across the greater Chicago metropolitan area (MAP). Participants 822 decedents with multi-omic data from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Exposure(s) Pseudotime, representing molecular distance from no cognitive impairment (NCI) to AD dementia, and three multi-omic brain molecular subtypes of AD dementia representing 3 omic pathways from no cognitive impairment (NCI) to AD dementia that differ by their omic constituents. Main outcome(s) and measure(s) We first ran four separate linear regressions with neuroticism, depressive symptoms, loneliness, purpose in life as the outcomes, and pseudotime as the predictor, adjusting for age, sex and education. We then ran four separate analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs) with Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc tests to test whether the three multi-omic AD subtypes are differentially associated with the four traits, adjusting for the same covariates. Result Pseudotime was positively associated ( p <0.05) with neuroticism and loneliness. AD subtypes were differentially associated with the traits: AD subtypes 1 and 3 were associated with neuroticism; AD subtype 2 with depressive symptoms; AD subtype 3 with loneliness, and AD subtype 2 with purpose in life. Conclusions and Relevance Three multi-omic brain molecular subtypes of AD dementia differentially share omic features with four psychological risk factors of AD dementia. Our data provide novel insights into the biology underlying well-established associations between psychological traits and AD dementia. Key points Question Are three distinct multi-omic brain molecular subtypes of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia associated with four well-established psychological AD risk factors (neuroticism, depressive symptoms, loneliness and purpose in life)? Findings We found differential associations: AD subtypes 1 and 3 were associated with neuroticism, AD subtype 2 was associated with depressive symptoms, AD subtype 3 was associated with loneliness; and AD subtype 2 was associated with purpose in life. Meaning Psychological risk factors might be associated with AD dementia via shared multi-omic molecular pathways.
Full text 3,203 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Importance Psychological traits reflecting neuroticism, depressive symptoms, loneliness, and purpose in life are risk factors of AD dementia; however, the underlying biologic mechanisms of these associations remain largely unknown.

Objective

To examine whether one or more multi-omic brain molecular subtypes of AD is associated with neuroticism, depressive symptoms, loneliness, and/or purpose in life. Design Two cohort-based studies; Religious Orders Study (ROS) and Rush Memory and Aging Project (MAP), both ongoing longitudinal clinical pathological studies that began enrollment in 1994 and 1997. Setting Older priests, nuns, and brothers from across the U.S. (ROS) and older adults from across the greater Chicago metropolitan area (MAP). Participants 822 decedents with multi-omic data from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Exposure(s) Pseudotime, representing molecular distance from no cognitive impairment (NCI) to AD dementia, and three multi-omic brain molecular subtypes of AD dementia representing 3 omic pathways from no cognitive impairment (NCI) to AD dementia that differ by their omic constituents. Main outcome(s) and measure(s) We first ran four separate linear regressions with neuroticism, depressive symptoms, loneliness, purpose in life as the outcomes, and pseudotime as the predictor, adjusting for age, sex and education. We then ran four separate analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs) with Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc tests to test whether the three multi-omic AD subtypes are differentially associated with the four traits, adjusting for the same covariates.

Result

Pseudotime was positively associated (p<0.05) with neuroticism and loneliness. AD subtypes were differentially associated with the traits: AD subtypes 1 and 3 were associated with neuroticism; AD subtype 2 with depressive symptoms; AD subtype 3 with loneliness, and AD subtype 2 with purpose in life.

Conclusions

and Relevance Three multi-omic brain molecular subtypes of AD dementia differentially share omic features with four psychological risk factors of AD dementia. Our data provide novel insights into the biology underlying well-established associations between psychological traits and AD dementia. Question Are three distinct multi-omic brain molecular subtypes of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia associated with four well-established psychological AD risk factors (neuroticism, depressive symptoms, loneliness and purpose in life)? Findings We found differential associations: AD subtypes 1 and 3 were associated with neuroticism, AD subtype 2 was associated with depressive symptoms, AD subtype 3 was associated with loneliness; and AD subtype 2 was associated with purpose in life. Meaning Psychological risk factors might be associated with AD dementia via shared multi-omic molecular pathways. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Co-authors email addresses: Lei_Yu{at}rush.edu; Victoria_Poole{at}rush.edu; konstantinos_arfanakis{at}rush.edu; Julie_A_Schneider{at}rush.edu; Vladislav.Petyuk{at}pnnl.gov; pld2115{at}cumc.columbia.edu; rima.kaddurahdaouk{at}duke.edu; yasser.iturriamedina{at}mcgill.ca; David_A_Bennett{at}rush.edu.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00