Polygenicity at the pathway level for anorexia nervosa

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-05 · read from full text

This study investigated how genetic risk aggregates across biological pathways in anorexia nervosa by building pathway-based polygenic risk scores (pathway PRS) for 3,687 individuals with anorexia nervosa and 11,257 controls. Using pathway PRS, the authors identified 497 anorexia nervosa–associated pathways (after Bonferroni correction) spanning brain, metabolism, immunity/stress, and reproduction/development, and found that the number of top-ranked pathways in individuals was strongly correlated with anorexia nervosa case proportion (including among people with low overall genetic risk). They also reported that higher risk was observed when pathway PRS signals aggregated within and across functional domains, with the brain-brain and brain-metabolism pathway pairs showing the highest average risk. The paper’s limitation is that pathway-level inference depends on the specific pathway construction and that the analysis is based on the genetic data and pathway definitions provided in the study, with no causal validation described. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies of common disorders reveal polygenic architectures. While these variants may converge into biologically relevant pathways, how polygenicity aggregates across pathways remains unknown. We studied polygenicity at the pathway level in anorexia nervosa (AN) - a psychiatric disorder with multi-systemic clinical manifestations. We constructed pathway-based polygenic risk scores (pathway PRS) to model genetic risk at the pathway level for 3,687 individuals with AN and 11,257 controls. We identified 497 AN-associated pathways after Bonferroni correction, including pathways involved in the brain, metabolism, immunity/stress, and reproduction/development. A strong positive correlation was observed between number of pathways ranking at top 10% and AN case proportion (r = 0.74, P = 7.98x10 -21 ). The positive correlation between pathway count and AN risk was also observed when restricted to individuals with low overall genetic risk of AN. Pathways ranking at top 10% among cases were more diverse than those in controls. Higher AN risk was observed for pathway aggregation within function (e.g., brain or metabolism) and across functions (e.g., brain + metabolism). Individuals at top 10% risk of brain-brain and brain-metabolism pathway pairs had the highest average AN risk compared to other pathway pairs (e.g., brain-immune, metabolism-metabolism). Further, pathway PRS provided higher prediction power of AN than overall genome-wide PRS and contributed to the genetic liability of AN among AN cases with low overall genetic risk. Together, our results demonstrate that polygenicity exists at the pathway level, opening new avenues for disease prediction and identification of actionable targets.
Full text 4,553 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Genome-wide association studies of common disorders reveal polygenic architectures. While these variants may converge into biologically relevant pathways, how polygenicity aggregates across pathways remains unknown. We studied polygenicity at the pathway level in anorexia nervosa (AN)—a psychiatric disorder with multi-systemic clinical manifestations. We constructed pathway-based polygenic risk scores (pathway PRS) to model genetic risk at the pathway level for 3,687 individuals with AN and 11,257 controls. We identified 497 AN- associated pathways after Bonferroni correction, including pathways involved in the brain, metabolism, immunity/stress, and reproduction/development. A strong positive correlation was observed between number of pathways ranking at top 10% and AN case proportion (r = 0.74, P = 7.98×10−21). The positive correlation between pathway count and AN risk was also observed when restricted to individuals with low overall genetic risk of AN. Pathways ranking at top 10% among cases were more diverse than those in controls. Higher AN risk was observed for pathway aggregation within function (e.g., brain or metabolism) and across functions (e.g., brain + metabolism). Individuals at top 10% risk of brain-brain and brain-metabolism pathway pairs had the highest average AN risk compared to other pathway pairs (e.g., brain-immune, metabolism- metabolism). Further, pathway PRS provided higher prediction power of AN than overall genome-wide PRS and contributed to the genetic liability of AN among AN cases with low overall genetic risk. Together, our results demonstrate that polygenicity exists at the pathway level, opening new avenues for disease prediction and identification of actionable targets. Competing Interest Statement C.M.B. reports Pearson Education Inc. (author, royalty recipient) and Orbimed (consultant). The rest of authors declare no competing interests. Funding Statement J.X. and L.M.H. are both supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) grants R01MH124839 and R01MH136149. CMB is supported by NIMH (R01MH136149, R01MH134039, R56MH129437, R01MH120170, R01MH124871, R01MH124871), Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet, award: 538-2013-8864), and Swedish Research Council 2024 (2024-02450). J.G.G. is supported by a grant from the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI, 1K99HG013547-01). P.F.O. is supported by funding from NIMH (R01MH122866) and NHGRI (R01HG012773). K.J.B. is supported by funding from NIMH (R01MH109897, R56MH101454, R01MH123155, R01MH106056) and from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES033630). The funding body is not involved in the study design, data collection, data analysis, result interpretation, and writing of the manuscript. Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: Because only deidentified data were used, our study was not considered as human research under the US Department of Health and Human Services regulations and was thus exempt from the Yale ethics committee. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Footnotes ↵# These are co-first authors. Data availability Datasets from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Eating Disorders Working Group are available by requesting data access through the PGC data access portal (https://pgc.unc.edu/for-researchers/data-access-committee/data-access-portal/).

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00