The threshold for laparoscopy for pelvic pain

In: The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist · 2010 · vol. 12(1) , pp. 7–12 · doi:10.1576/toag.12.1.007.27552 · W2034917031
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 7 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

Laparoscopy for pelvic pain is justified in acute cases, but for chronic pain, individual risk-benefit assessment is required before proceeding.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Detailed history and examination are crucial. Laparoscopy is readily justifiable in acute pain. In chronic pelvic pain, the possible benefits and risks associated with laparoscopy need to be assessed for each woman individually. Learning objectives: To outline gynaecological and non‐gynaecological reasons for pelvic pain. To evaluate methods of diagnosis. To determine the likelihood of laparoscopy being effective in diagnosis and treatment, and the associated risks in each individual case. Ethical issues: The risks of unnecessary and unhelpful surgery should be balanced against the risks associated with delay and possible misdiagnosis. Please cite this article as: Laborda E, Clarke A, Carpenter T. The threshold for laparoscopy for pelvic pain. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2010;12:7–12.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (32)

Cited by (7)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK