Direct Human Interventions Drive Non-Stationarity in Annual Peak Streamflow Patterns Across the United States

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-05

This study analyzed streamflow data to demonstrate that human activities have caused significant, non-random shifts in the timing of peak annual streamflow across the United States.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-05 · read from full text

The paper analyzes annual peak streamflow (peakflow) non-stationarity using observations from 3,907 USGS stations across the United States, applying high-resolution climate and land-use data with geospatial analytics to identify drivers of trends. It finds significant peakflow trends in 34% of stations, with decreases in about two-thirds and increases mainly in the Northeast and Great Lakes, and reports that 84% of stations are influenced by direct human interventions such as water management and land-use changes. Urbanization and water management are identified as the primary drivers (with region-specific variance contributions), while agriculture and climate change play secondary roles, and current climate/earth system models fail to adequately capture these human-induced factors despite large ensembles. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Understanding the factors driving non-stationarity in annual peak streamflow, hereafter referred to as peakflow, remains pivotal amid climate change and direct human interventions1,2. Utilizing extensive streamflow observations from 3907 United States Geological Survey (USGS) stations, we have detected significant trends in 34% of these stations. Among these, two-thirds exhibit decreasing trends distributed across the United States, while the remaining one-third show increasing trends, predominantly in the Northeast and Great Lakes regions. Most USGS stations (84%) are influenced by direct human interventions such as water management and land use changes. Employing high-resolution climate and land-use data along with geospatial analytics, this study reveals urbanization and water management as the primary drivers, followed by agriculture and climate change. Urbanization emerges as the principal driver of peakflow trends in the Texas-Gulf, California, and Mid-Atlantic regions, accounting for up to 62%, 44%, and 32% of the variance, respectively. Water management explains most of the variance in the Tennessee (37%) and Ohio River Basins (30%). In the Upper Colorado River Basin, both agricultural and water management play significant roles, explaining up to 28% and 24% of the variance, respectively. Additionally, agricultural land use explains 17% of the variance in the Great Lakes region. Climate contributes modestly in the Rio Grande (15%) and California (11%) regions. Despite their extensive number of climate realizations (large ensemble), the latest generation of climate and earth system models inadequately captures these human-induced factors, limiting their predictive accuracy. By demonstrating the outsized influence of human interventions on peakflow trends and inadequacies in current climate models, our findings stress the imperative of integrating water management and urbanization effects into climate models for more accurate water predictions.
Full text 12,017 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Direct Human Interventions Drive Non-Stationarity in Annual Peak Streamflow Patterns Across the United States | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Physical Sciences - Article Direct Human Interventions Drive Non-Stationarity in Annual Peak Streamflow Patterns Across the United States Venkatesh Merwade This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4077594/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 29 Sep, 2025 Read the published version in Communications Earth & Environment → Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Understanding the factors driving non-stationarity in annual peak streamflow, hereafter referred to as peakflow, remains pivotal amid climate change and direct human interventions 1,2 . Utilizing extensive streamflow observations from 3907 United States Geological Survey (USGS) stations, we have detected significant trends in 34% of these stations. Among these, two-thirds exhibit decreasing trends distributed across the United States, while the remaining one-third show increasing trends, predominantly in the Northeast and Great Lakes regions. Most USGS stations (84%) are influenced by direct human interventions such as water management and land use changes. Employing high-resolution climate and land-use data along with geospatial analytics, this study reveals urbanization and water management as the primary drivers, followed by agriculture and climate change. Urbanization emerges as the principal driver of peakflow trends in the Texas-Gulf, California, and Mid-Atlantic regions, accounting for up to 62%, 44%, and 32% of the variance, respectively. Water management explains most of the variance in the Tennessee (37%) and Ohio River Basins (30%). In the Upper Colorado River Basin, both agricultural and water management play significant roles, explaining up to 28% and 24% of the variance, respectively. Additionally, agricultural land use explains 17% of the variance in the Great Lakes region. Climate contributes modestly in the Rio Grande (15%) and California (11%) regions. Despite their extensive number of climate realizations (large ensemble), the latest generation of climate and earth system models inadequately captures these human-induced factors, limiting their predictive accuracy. By demonstrating the outsized influence of human interventions on peakflow trends and inadequacies in current climate models, our findings stress the imperative of integrating water management and urbanization effects into climate models for more accurate water predictions. Earth and environmental sciences/Hydrology Physical sciences/Engineering Full Text Additional Declarations There is NO Competing Interest. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 29 Sep, 2025 Read the published version in Communications Earth & Environment → Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4077594","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Physical Sciences - Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":281108705,"identity":"2030a3ac-8eff-4cbd-ba25-a8003063acc0","order_by":0,"name":"Venkatesh Merwade","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5518-2890","institution":"Purdue University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Venkatesh","middleName":"","lastName":"Merwade","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-03-11 19:10:32","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4077594/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4077594/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02738-8","type":"published","date":"2025-09-29T04:00:00+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":92475396,"identity":"88ff923c-c268-4545-b438-acf9d65199db","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-30 07:16:51","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":4546041,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Josephetal2024draft10SK.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4077594/v1_covered_c637dd02-eb3b-4a64-a2de-9d695fe7141e.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"There is \u003cb\u003eNO\u003c/b\u003e Competing Interest.","formattedTitle":"Direct Human Interventions Drive Non-Stationarity in Annual Peak Streamflow Patterns Across the United States","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"nature-portfolio","isNatureJournal":true,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Nature Portfolio","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":false,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4077594/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4077594/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eUnderstanding the factors driving non-stationarity in annual peak streamflow, hereafter referred to as peakflow, remains pivotal amid climate change and direct human interventions\u003csup\u003e1,2\u003c/sup\u003e. Utilizing extensive streamflow observations from 3907 United States Geological Survey (USGS) stations, we have detected significant trends in 34% of these stations. Among these, two-thirds exhibit decreasing trends distributed across the United States, while the remaining one-third show increasing trends, predominantly in the Northeast and Great Lakes regions. Most USGS stations (84%) are influenced by direct human interventions such as water management and land use changes. Employing high-resolution climate and land-use data along with geospatial analytics, this study reveals urbanization and water management as the primary drivers, followed by agriculture and climate change. Urbanization emerges as the principal driver of peakflow trends in the Texas-Gulf, California, and Mid-Atlantic regions, accounting for up to 62%, 44%, and 32% of the variance, respectively. Water management explains most of the variance in the Tennessee (37%) and Ohio River Basins (30%). In the Upper Colorado River Basin, both agricultural and water management play significant roles, explaining up to 28% and 24% of the variance, respectively. Additionally, agricultural land use explains 17% of the variance in the Great Lakes region. Climate contributes modestly in the Rio Grande (15%) and California (11%) regions. Despite their extensive number of climate realizations (large ensemble), the latest generation of climate and earth system models inadequately captures these human-induced factors, limiting their predictive accuracy. By demonstrating the outsized influence of human interventions on peakflow trends and inadequacies in current climate models, our findings stress the imperative of integrating water management and urbanization effects into climate models for more accurate water predictions.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Direct Human Interventions Drive Non-Stationarity in Annual Peak Streamflow Patterns Across the United States","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-03-28 03:48:01","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4077594/v1","editorialEvents":[],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"communications-earth-and-environment","isNatureJournal":true,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"commsenv","sideBox":"Learn more about [Communications Earth and Environment](https://www.nature.com/commsenv/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Communications Earth \u0026 Environment","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"Communications Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"4ef6da43-3c9a-4621-bd5d-f44ad97b6cf0","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 28th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":29600856,"name":"Earth and environmental sciences/Hydrology"},{"id":29600857,"name":"Physical sciences/Engineering"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-09-30T07:16:43+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-4077594","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02738-8","journal":{"identity":"communications-earth-and-environment","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Communications Earth \u0026 Environment"},"publishedOn":"2025-09-29 04:00:00","publishedOnDateReadable":"September 29th, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-03-28 03:48:01","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s43247-025-02738-8","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02738-8","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4077594","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4077594","identity":"rs-4077594","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00