MR findings for differentiating decidualized endometriomas from seromucinous borderline tumors of the ovary

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 5 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-13

The number, height, T1 signal intensity ratio of mural nodules, lobulated margin, pedunculated configuration, and T2 hypointense core were identified as useful MR findings for differentiating decidualized endometriomas from seromucinous borderline tumors.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13 · read from full text

This retrospective study compared MR imaging findings from 8 decidualized endometriomas (DEs) and 14 seromucinous borderline tumors (SMBTs) of the ovary to evaluate differentiation when mural nodules appear markedly hyperintense on T2-weighted images. Quantitative assessment showed DEs had significantly greater number and higher T1-weighted signal intensity ratios, but significantly lower mural nodule height than SMBTs, while there were no significant differences in T2-weighted signal intensity ratios, diffusion-weighted imaging signal intensity ratios, or apparent diffusion coefficient values. Qualitatively, lobulated margins, pedunculated configurations, and T2 hypointense cores were significantly more frequent in SMBTs than in DEs. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it focuses on differentiating decidualized endometriomas (a decidualized endometriosis manifestation) from seromucinous borderline ovarian tumors using MR features.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PurposeDecidualized endometriomas (DEs) and seromucinous borderline tumors (SMBTs) exhibit similar MR findings including markedly hyperintense mural nodules within endometriotic cysts on T2-weighted images. The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of MR imaging for differentiating between DEs and SMBTs of the ovary.Materials and methodsMR images of 8 DEs and 14 SMBTs were retrospectively assessed and compared according to pathologies.ResultsWith regard to quantitative assessments of mural nodules, the number and signal intensity ratios (SIRs) on T1-weighted images were significantly greater in DEs than in SMBTs (11.0 ± 8.4 vs. 4.3 ± 4.1, p < 0.05 and 2.36 ± 0.56 vs. 1.49 ± 0.27, p < 0.01, respectively), whereas the height was significantly lower in DEs than in SMBTs (4.5 ± 1.4 mm vs. 21.9 ± 11.4 mm, p < 0.01). However, there were no significant differences between DEs and SMBTs in the SIRs on T2-weighted images, SIRs on diffusion-weighted images, and apparent diffusion coefficient values. With regard to qualitative assessments of mural nodules, the lobulated margin, pedunculated configuration, and T2 hypointense core were significantly more frequent in SMBTs than in DEs (71% vs. 0%, p < 0.01; 86% vs. 0%, p < 0.01; and 43% vs. 0%, p < 0.05, respectively).ConclusionThe number, height, SIRs on T1-weighted images, lobulated margin, pedunculated configuration, and T2 hypointense core of mural nodules within endometriotic cysts were useful MR findings for differentiating DEs from SMBTs.
Full text 6,459 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose Decidualized endometriomas (DEs) and seromucinous borderline tumors (SMBTs) exhibit similar MR findings including markedly hyperintense mural nodules within endometriotic cysts on T2-weighted images. The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of MR imaging for differentiating between DEs and SMBTs of the ovary.

Materials and methods

MR images of 8 DEs and 14 SMBTs were retrospectively assessed and compared according to pathologies.

Results

With regard to quantitative assessments of mural nodules, the number and signal intensity ratios (SIRs) on T1-weighted images were significantly greater in DEs than in SMBTs (11.0 ± 8.4 vs. 4.3 ± 4.1, p < 0.05 and 2.36 ± 0.56 vs. 1.49 ± 0.27, p < 0.01, respectively), whereas the height was significantly lower in DEs than in SMBTs (4.5 ± 1.4 mm vs. 21.9 ± 11.4 mm, p < 0.01). However, there were no significant differences between DEs and SMBTs in the SIRs on T2-weighted images, SIRs on diffusion-weighted images, and apparent diffusion coefficient values. With regard to qualitative assessments of mural nodules, the lobulated margin, pedunculated configuration, and T2 hypointense core were significantly more frequent in SMBTs than in DEs (71% vs. 0%, p < 0.01; 86% vs. 0%, p < 0.01; and 43% vs. 0%, p < 0.05, respectively).

Conclusion

The number, height, SIRs on T1-weighted images, lobulated margin, pedunculated configuration, and T2 hypointense core of mural nodules within endometriotic cysts were useful MR findings for differentiating DEs from SMBTs. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Schindler AE (2004) Pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Minerva Ginecol 56:419-435. Vigano P, Parazzini F, Somigliana E, et al. (2004) Endometriosis: epidemiology and aetiological factors. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18:177-200. Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Uehara H, et al. (2006) Malignant transformation of pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging findings and pathologic correlation. Radiographics 26:407-417. Bourgioti C, Preza O, Panourgias E, et al. (2017) MR imaging of endometriosis: Spectrum of disease. Diagn Interv Imaging 98:751-767. Rutgers JL, Scully RE (1988) Ovarian mullerian mucinous papillary cystadenomas of borderline malignancy. A clinicopathologic analysis. Cancer 61:340-348. Kim KR, Choi J, Hwang JE, et al. (2010) Endocervical-like (Mullerian) mucinous borderline tumours of the ovary are frequently associated with the KRAS mutation. Histopathology 57:587-596. Tanaka YO, Okada S, Yagi T, et al. (2010) MRI of endometriotic cysts in association with ovarian carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:355-361. Siegelman ES, Oliver ER (2012) MR imaging of endometriosis: ten imaging pearls. Radiographics 32:1675-1691. Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Nishitani H (2008) Magnetic resonance manifestations of decidualized endometriomas during pregnancy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32:353-355. Morisawa N, Kido A, Kataoka M, et al. (2014) Magnetic resonance imaging manifestations of decidualized endometriotic cysts: comparative study with ovarian cancers associated with endometriotic cysts. J Comput Assist Tomogr 38:879-884. Kataoka M, Togashi K, Koyama T, et al. (2002) MR imaging of mullerian mucinous borderline tumors arising from endometriotic cysts. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:532-537. Kurata Y, Kido A, Moribata Y, et al. (2017) Diagnostic performance of MR imaging findings and quantitative values in the differentiation of seromucinous borderline tumour from endometriosis-related malignant ovarian tumour. Eur Radiol 27:1695-1703. Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Harada M (2016) Computed diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating decidualized endometrioma from ovarian cancer. Eur J Radiol 85:1016-1019. Liu T, Sumida D, Wada T, et al. (2019) A diagnostic challenge of seromucinous borderline tumor: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 98:e15707. Leiserowitz GS, Xing G, Cress R, et al. (2006) Adnexal masses in pregnancy: how often are they malignant? Gynecol Oncol 101:315-321. Matsubayashi RN, Matsuo Y, Nakazono T, et al. (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging manifestations of ovarian mullerian mixed epithelial borderline tumors: imaging and histologic features in comparison with mullerian mucinous borderline tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 39:276-280. Kurata Y, Kido A, Moribata Y, et al. (2018) Differentiation of Seromucinous Borderline Tumor from Serous Borderline Tumor on MR Imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 17:211-217. Fruscella E, Testa AC, Ferrandina G, et al. (2004) Sonographic features of decidualized ovarian endometriosis suspicious for malignancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24:578-580. Yoshida S, Onogi A, Shigetomi H, et al. (2008) Two cases of pregnant women with ovarian endometrioma mimicking a malignant ovarian tumor. J Clin Ultrasound 36:512-516. Rodriguez IM, Irving JA, Prat J (2004) Endocervical-like mucinous borderline tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic analysis of 31 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 28:1311-1318. Shimamoto A, Isomoto I, Segawa K, et al. (2014) The MRI findings in a case of ovarian mucinous borderline tumor mimicking a serous surface borderline tumor. Jpn J Radiol 32:552-555. Tanase Y, Kawaguchi R, Takahama J, et al. (2018) Factors that Differentiate between Endometriosis-associated Ovarian Cancer and Benign Ovarian Endometriosis with Mural Nodules. Magn Reson Med Sci 17:231-237. Expert Panel on MRS, Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, et al. (2013) ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:501-530. Funding No funding was received for this study. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Ethical approval This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Informed consent Informed consent waiver was obtained by institutional review board for this study. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Ando, T., Kato, H., Kawaguchi, M. et al. MR findings for differentiating decidualized endometriomas from seromucinous borderline tumors of the ovary. Abdom Radiol 45, 1783–1789 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02412-x Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02412-x

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Ovarian Neoplasms Female Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Retrospective Studies

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (23)

Cited by (6)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-30T06:25:42.655704+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:22:17.025735+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK