Psilocybin Attenuates Cortical Representations of Aversion in the Mouse Auditory Cortex

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

The study investigated how psilocybin reshapes learned valence representations in the auditory cortex by using longitudinal two-photon calcium imaging in awake C57BL/6 mice. Researchers measured layer 2/3 auditory cortex activity to tones with or without prior associations with valenced stimuli (reward vs aversion) and also to the valenced stimuli themselves, identifying neuron subsets selective for reward, aversive stimuli, both, or tones alone. Psilocybin selectively reduced responses to aversive stimuli and to earlier-established aversive-associated tones, while not affecting aversive association, reward responses, responses to newly aversive-associated tones, or broadly altering auditory processing. The paper explicitly relates to endometriosis and/or adenomyosis only at the level of corpus inclusion via keywords, as it does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Psilocybin can produce sustained benefits in affective and trauma-related disorders, yet if and how it reshapes sensory representations of learned valence associations remains largely unclear. To address this, we used longitudinal two-photon calcium imaging in awake C57BL/6 mice to examine how psilocybin modulates layer 2/3 auditory cortex activity at single-cell and population levels. Evoked responses were measured for tones with or without prior associations with valenced stimuli, as well as for the valenced stimuli themselves. Most responsive neurons were selective for tones alone, while distinct subsets responded exclusively to reward or aversive stimuli, and a smaller population encoded both. Psilocybin selectively reduced responses to aversive stimuli and earlier-established aversive-associated tones, without affecting aversive association, reward responses, or responses to newly aversive-associated tones. At the population level, psilocybin acutely increased coordination across tone-responsive neurons, while later reducing it selectively among neurons encoding the aversive-associated tone. These results demonstrate that psilocybin preferentially dampens well consolidated aversive sensory representations in auditory cortex, rather than fresh associations, without broadly affecting auditory processing or new aversive learning.
Full text 1,440 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Psilocybin can produce sustained benefits in affective and trauma-related disorders, yet if and how it reshapes sensory representations of learned valence associations remains largely unclear. To address this, we used longitudinal two-photon calcium imaging in awake C57BL/6 mice to examine how psilocybin modulates layer 2/3 auditory cortex activity at single-cell and population levels. Evoked responses were measured for tones with or without prior associations with valenced stimuli, as well as for the valenced stimuli themselves. Most responsive neurons were selective for tones alone, while distinct subsets responded exclusively to reward or aversive stimuli, and a smaller population encoded both. Psilocybin selectively reduced responses to aversive stimuli and earlier-established aversive-associated tones, without affecting aversive association, reward responses, or responses to newly aversive-associated tones. At the population level, psilocybin acutely increased coordination across tone-responsive neurons, while later reducing it selectively among neurons encoding the aversive-associated tone. These results demonstrate that psilocybin preferentially dampens well consolidated aversive sensory representations in auditory cortex, rather than fresh associations, without broadly affecting auditory processing or new aversive learning. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00