Integrated Ultrasound Neuromodulation and Optical Neuroimaging in Awake Mice using a Transparent Ultrasound Transducer Cranial Window

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,731 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Ultrasound neuromodulation is a rapidly advancing, non-invasive technique with significant therapeutic potential for treating various neurological disorders. Although extensive in vitro and in vivo studies have provided valuable insights into its modulatory effects, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood, limiting its clinical translation. Optical neuroimaging techniques can help investigate these mechanisms; however, the opacity and bulkiness of conventional ultrasound transducers pose significant challenges for their integration with in vivo ultrasound neuromodulation studies, particularly in awake rodents. To address these limitations, we propose a straightforward solution: a miniaturized lithium niobate-based transparent ultrasound transducer (TUT) integrated as a thinned-skull cranial window for ultrasound stimulation while facilitating multimodal optical neuroimaging in awake mice brain. Using laser speckle contrast imaging and intrinsic optical signal imaging, we studied changes in brain hemodynamics in response to various ultrasound stimulation sequences. Our experiments demonstrated that TUT cranial window can robustly induce neuromodulatory effects with observed increase in both cerebral blood flow and total hemoglobin, with peak and cumulative hemodynamic changes directionally correlated with ultrasound stimulation duration and intensity. Overall, these findings highlight that TUT cranial window can seamlessly integrate ultrasound stimulation and optical neuroimaging in awake mouse brain models, offering promising prospects for uncovering the underlying mechanisms of ultrasound neuromodulation. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00