Systematic errors in enzymatic conversion limit cell-free DNA methylation specificity

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Enzymatic methylation sequencing (EM-seq) converts unmethylated cytosines to uracils while preserving DNA integrity, making it attractive for liquid biopsies. Here we report a reproducible fragment-level over-conversion error in EM-seq, which is not observed in bisulfite-based conversion or in Oxford Nanopore sequencing. While bisulfite and nanopore errors occur at sporadic CpGs, EM-seq generates molecules that appear fully unmethylated, introducing a false-positive background signal that severely limits deconvolution specificity in cfDNA analysis.
Full text 853 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Enzymatic methylation sequencing (EM-seq) converts unmethylated cytosines to uracils while preserving DNA integrity, making it attractive for liquid biopsies. Here we report a reproducible fragment-level over-conversion error in EM-seq, which is not observed in bisulfite-based conversion or in Oxford Nanopore sequencing. While bisulfite and nanopore errors occur at sporadic CpGs, EM-seq generates molecules that appear fully unmethylated, introducing a false-positive background signal that severely limits deconvolution specificity in cfDNA analysis. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00