Growth characteristics of Myco-Composites Produced Using Locally Isolated Ganoderma Species and Lignocellulosic Waste

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-06 · read from full text

The paper studied the growth characteristics and resulting properties of myco-composites made by culturing locally isolated Ganoderma species on different lignocellulosic waste substrates (paper, cardboard, sawdust, and wood shavings) with eight substrate formulations. Across formulations, fine fibrous substrates such as paper and cardboard produced the most uniform mycelial colonization and higher composite densities (0.45 and 0.41 g/cm3), whereas coarse or mixed substrates including wood shavings yielded lighter, less dense composites (about 0.27 g/cm3), with volumetric shrinkage varying from 7.1% to 26.7% depending on substrate type. FTIR spectroscopy confirmed fungal and lignocellulosic functional groups in the composites. The study limitation is that it focuses on material growth/structure metrics rather than biological mechanisms or health outcomes. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

This study reports the development of myco-composites from locally isolated Ganoderma species and regional lignocellulosic wastes such as paper, cardboard, sawdust, and wood shavings. Eight substrate formulations were evaluated for fungal colonization and composite quality. Visual inspection revealed that fine, fibrous substrates like paper and cardboard achieved the most uniform mycelial colonization and highest densities (0.45 and 0.41 g/cm 3 , respectively), while coarse, porous substrates such as wood shavings and mixed substrates (M1 and M2) produced lighter, less dense composites (0.27 g/cm 3 ). Volumetric shrinkage ranged from 7.1% to 26.7%, with lower values in cardboard and higher in wood shavings. FTIR spectroscopy confirmed the presence of characteristic fungal and lignocellulosic functional groups in mixed composites. These findings demonstrate that composite density, dimensional stability, and chemical structure are strongly influenced by substrate type and proportion, highlighting the potential for tailored myco-composite materials using local waste resources. Graphical Abstract
Full text 1,173 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract This study reports the development of myco-composites from locally isolated Ganoderma species and regional lignocellulosic wastes such as paper, cardboard, sawdust, and wood shavings. Eight substrate formulations were evaluated for fungal colonization and composite quality. Visual inspection revealed that fine, fibrous substrates like paper and cardboard achieved the most uniform mycelial colonization and highest densities (0.45 and 0.41 g/cm3, respectively), while coarse, porous substrates such as wood shavings and mixed substrates (M1 and M2) produced lighter, less dense composites (0.27 g/cm3). Volumetric shrinkage ranged from 7.1% to 26.7%, with lower values in cardboard and higher in wood shavings. FTIR spectroscopy confirmed the presence of characteristic fungal and lignocellulosic functional groups in mixed composites. These findings demonstrate that composite density, dimensional stability, and chemical structure are strongly influenced by substrate type and proportion, highlighting the potential for tailored myco-composite materials using local waste resources. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00