Motivation resides only in our language, not in our mental processes.

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

“Motivation” is one of the most popular and important concepts in psychology. But what is motivation actually? To answer the question, in this essay, I argue that motivation does not exist in our mental processes --- rather, motivation is a naïve linguistic expression that loosely represents emergent properties of underlying mental processes. Therefore, there are no definitive features of motivation, and there is no such entity in our mental processes. As an example, I showed that a reward-learning framework of knowledge acquisition can sufficiently describe autonomous behaviors often attributed to “need for competence”, without assuming the existence of such motivation. I further argue that the term motivation is so useful to explain behavior that it could often even stop us from thinking deeply about our mental processes, potentially preventing the mechanistic understanding of human mind.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00