Ten golden rules for restoration to secure resilient and just seagrass social-ecological systems

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

It is unequivocal that the world has lost a significant proportion of its seagrass, and although glimmers of hope exist, losses continue with many ongoing negative trajectories. First and foremost, we need to put the world on a global pathway to seagrass net gain. Conservation of what remains must be a priority, but we need to increase coverage at rates unlikely to be achieved naturally; large-scale active restoration is required to fill this gap. Novel finance mechanisms aligned to the climate emergency and biodiversity crises are increasingly leading to larger-scale restoration projects. However, no clear framework exists for developing or prioritising approaches. With seagrass restoration expensive and unreliable, rigorous guidance is required to improve effectiveness and ensure it is cost-effective, so that projects can begin to transform whole coastlines. Building on current evidence from both terrestrial and marine sources, here we apply the ‘10 golden rules’ concept, first outlined for reforestation and later applied to coral reefs, to seagrass restoration. In doing so, we follow the International Principles and Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration and view seagrass restoration in a broad context, whereby regeneration can be achieved by either planting or by enhancing and facilitating natural recovery. These rules somewhat differ from those on reforestation and coral reef restoration, principally due to the relative immaturity of seagrass restoration science compared to these comprehensively researched ecosystems. These 10 golden rules for seagrass restoration are placed within a coupled social-ecological systems (SES) context and we present a framework for conservation more broadly, to achieve multiple goals pertaining to people, biodiversity and the planet.
Full text 2,471 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

It is unequivocal that the world has lost a significant proportion of its seagrass, and although glimmers of hope exist, losses continue with many ongoing negative trajectories. First and foremost, we need to put the world on a global pathway to seagrass net gain. Conservation of what remains must be a priority, but we need to increase coverage at rates unlikely to be achieved naturally; large-scale active restoration is required to fill this gap. Novel finance mechanisms aligned to the climate emergency and biodiversity crises are increasingly leading to larger-scale restoration projects. However, no clear framework exists for developing or prioritising approaches. With seagrass restoration expensive and unreliable, rigorous guidance is required to improve effectiveness and ensure it is cost-effective, so that projects can begin to transform whole coastlines. Building on current evidence from both terrestrial and marine sources, here we apply the ‘10 golden rules’ concept, first outlined for reforestation and later applied to coral reefs, to seagrass restoration. In doing so, we follow the International Principles and Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration and view seagrass restoration in a broad context, whereby regeneration can be achieved by either planting or by enhancing and facilitating natural recovery. These rules somewhat differ from those on reforestation and coral reef restoration, principally due to the relative immaturity of seagrass restoration science compared to these comprehensively researched ecosystems. These 10 golden rules for seagrass restoration are placed within a coupled social-ecological systems (SES) context and we present a framework for conservation more broadly, to achieve multiple goals pertaining to people, biodiversity and the planet. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X2Q61K Subjects Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Marine Biology, Plant Sciences

Keywords

marine, restoration, Ecological, conservation, eelgrass Dates Published: 2024-05-20 11:16 Last Updated: 2024-05-20 15:16 License CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Additional Metadata Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: Not applicable Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00