No evidence for an effect of M1 cTBS on schema-mediated motor sequence learning

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The availability of a pre-existing cognitive-motor schema accelerates the learning of novel motor information. The encoding of a novel schema-compatible, compared to -incompatible, motor sequence was recently shown to be supported by the left primary motor cortex (M1). However, causal evidence for the role of M1 in schema-mediated motor learning is currently lacking. In the current study, we aimed to address this knowledge gap by transiently disrupting M1 using inhibitory continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS). Forty-eight young healthy participants learned a bimanual motor sequence task (cognitive-motor schema). Twenty-four hours later, they learned a novel sequence whose ordinal schematic structure was compatible with that learned on the previous day. To provide causal evidence for a role of M1 on such schema-mediated motor learning, we applied either cTBS or sham stimulation to the left M1 immediately prior to encoding the schema-compatible novel sequence. Electromyography results showed no evidence for an effect of left M1 cTBS on corticospinal excitability as measured with motor-evoked potentials. Similarly, behavioral results indicated no significant effect of cTBS on subsequent schema-mediated motor sequence learning. Altogether, the present data do not provide evidence for a causal role of the left M1 in schema-mediated motor sequence learning.
Full text 1,463 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The availability of a pre-existing cognitive-motor schema accelerates the learning of novel motor information. The encoding of a novel schema-compatible, compared to-incompatible, motor sequence was recently shown to be supported by the left primary motor cortex (M1). However, causal evidence for the role of M1 in schema-mediated motor learning is currently lacking. In the current study, we aimed to address this knowledge gap by transiently disrupting M1 using inhibitory continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS). Forty-eight young healthy participants learned a bimanual motor sequence task (cognitive-motor schema). Twenty-four hours later, they learned a novel sequence whose ordinal schematic structure was compatible with that learned on the previous day. To provide causal evidence for a role of M1 on such schema-mediated motor learning, we applied either cTBS or sham stimulation to the left M1 immediately prior to encoding the schema-compatible novel sequence. Electromyography results showed no evidence for an effect of left M1 cTBS on corticospinal excitability as measured with motor-evoked potentials. Similarly, behavioral results indicated no significant effect of cTBS on subsequent schema-mediated motor sequence learning. Altogether, the present data do not provide evidence for a causal role of the left M1 in schema-mediated motor sequence learning. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00