Disease-associated aggregation of Dactylopleustes yoshimurai on sea urchins: host-level and lesion-level processes

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

This preprint studied how the symbiotic amphipod Dactylopleustes yoshimurai aggregates on lesions of the short-spined sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius, testing both host-level and within-host behavioral mechanisms using paired host-selection trials, separation in cylinders, time-series observations, and experiments altering pedicellaria defenses and inducing wounding. Amphipods accumulated more on diseased than healthy hosts, but this diseased-host preference disappeared when hosts were physically separated, and amphipods rarely switched hosts once settled, implying host-to-host transfer mainly occurs when urchins contact closely. On diseased hosts, most amphipods attached soon after introduction and progressively concentrated on lesion surfaces within ~6 h, with observations suggesting repeated pedicellaria contacts enabled stepwise movement while microhabitats inaccessible to pedicellariae promoted retention and stationarity. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 2,683 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Amphipods of the genus Dactylopleustes are specialized symbionts of sea urchins, and in some species aggregations on host lesions have been reported; however, the behavioural mechanisms underlying such lesion-associated aggregation remain poorly understood. We investigated host-level and within-host processes underlying lesion aggregation in the symbiotic amphipod Dactylopleustes yoshimurai on the short-spined sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius. In paired host-selection trials with freely moving urchins, amphipods accumulated more on diseased than on healthy hosts. When hosts were held apart in net cylinders, this bias toward diseased hosts disappeared, and individuals that had settled on a host rarely switched hosts, suggesting that host-to-host transfer occurs mainly when urchins approach one another. In a time-series aggregation experiment on diseased hosts, most amphipods attached soon after introduction and gradually concentrated on the lesion surface within approximately 6 h. Qualitative observations suggested that repeated contacts with host pedicellariae may promote stepwise movements across the test, whereas amphipods that reached pedicellariae-inaccessible microhabitats, including long-spine tips or the lesion surface, became largely stationary. Finally, on otherwise healthy hosts, both experimental pedicellariae removal and surface wounding induced amphipod accumulation, indicating that lesion-like microhabitats can form via reduced defence, disturbance cues, or both. Together, our results support a stepwise model in which D. yoshimurai first attaches with limited host-level discrimination, switches hosts primarily via short-range transfer, and then is retained in lesion microhabitats on the host surface. This two-scale framework links experimental behaviour to field patterns and highlights host contact rates and lesion availability as key determinants of symbiont distribution. https://doi.org/10.32942/X24365 Marine Biology Published: 2026-03-05 15:29 Last Updated: 2026-03-05 15:29 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00