EP24.37: Virtual reality for alleviating pain and anxiety during transvaginal sonography for endometriosis: a prospective randomised controlled study

In: Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · 2024 · vol. 64(S1) , pp. 354 · doi:10.1002/uog.29043 · PMID:39248987 · W4402358816
article OA: bronze CC0

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of VR for alleviating pain and anxiety in patients undergoing transvaginal sonography (TVS) for endometriosis. This was a prospective randomised controlled study, carried out at a single tertiary center between December 2023 and March 2024. Women who were scheduled for TVS for endometriosis, were randomly assigned for VR-assisted or conventional TVS. Pain and anxiety were assessed before and immediately after TVS using 1-10 numeric pain rating scale, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-s) questioner. Primary outcomes were changes in pain and anxiety scores. Fifty-five women were enrolled to the study, 32 were assigned to VR-assisted and 23 to conventional TVS. Some of the participants independently took analgesics before the examination. The proportion of women who took analgesics prior to TVS was significantly lower in the VR-assisted group compared to conventional TVS group (12.5% vs. 52.2%, P=0.01). Other baseline parameters did not differ between the groups. The changes of pain and anxiety scores are presented in table 1. This study confirms the effectiveness of VR in reducing pain and anxiety during TVS for endometriosis. VR users experienced greater improvements in scores despite using less analgesics, highlighting the benefits of VR. Larger studies are needed to establish VR as standard tool for the management of pain and anxiety during TVS for endometriosis. VR-assisted (n = 32)
Full text 2,295 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy of VR for alleviating pain and anxiety in patients undergoing transvaginal sonography (TVS) for endometriosis.

Methods

This was a prospective randomised controlled study, carried out at a single tertiary center between December 2023 and March 2024. Women who were scheduled for TVS for endometriosis, were randomly assigned for VR-assisted or conventional TVS. Pain and anxiety were assessed before and immediately after TVS using 1-10 numeric pain rating scale, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-s) questioner. Primary outcomes were changes in pain and anxiety scores.

Results

Fifty-five women were enrolled to the study, 32 were assigned to VR-assisted and 23 to conventional TVS. Some of the participants independently took analgesics before the examination. The proportion of women who took analgesics prior to TVS was significantly lower in the VR-assisted group compared to conventional TVS group (12.5% vs. 52.2%, P=0.01). Other baseline parameters did not differ between the groups. The changes of pain and anxiety scores are presented in table 1.

Conclusions

This study confirms the effectiveness of VR in reducing pain and anxiety during TVS for endometriosis. VR users experienced greater improvements in scores despite using less analgesics, highlighting the benefits of VR. Larger studies are needed to establish VR as standard tool for the management of pain and anxiety during TVS for endometriosis. EP24.37: Table 1. Pain and STAI-s scores in women undergoing TVS for endometriosis with and without VR | VR-assisted (n = 32) | Conventional TVS (n = 23) | P-value | | |---|---|---|---| | Pain score before VR (mean score | 4.1 ± 3.6 | 5.4 ± 3.3 | 0.19 | | STAI-s before VR (mean score) | 44.0 ± 11.1 | 43.6 ± 12.3 | 0.90 | | Pain score after VR (mean score) | 3.7 ± 2.9 | 5.4 ± 3.3 | 0.03 | | STAI-s after VR (mean score) | 37.0 ± 10.8 | 43.4 ± 13.5 | 0.04 | | Pain score improvement [n (%)] | 21 (65.6) | 3 (13.0) | 0.0001 | | STAI-s improvement [n (%)] | 27 (84.4) | 8 (34.8) | 0.0002 | | Satisfaction from VR [n (%)] | 26 (81.3) | || | Willing to undergo VR again [n (%)] | 27 (84.4) |

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK