Implementing a shared decision-making tool to support treatment decisions for patients following an Anterior Cruciate Ligament rupture – a protocol for the POP-ACLR feasibility study

preprint OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Background Treatment for Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) rupture may follow a surgical or non-surgical pathway. At present, there is uncertainty around treatment choice. Two shared decision-making tools have been co-designed to support patients to make a decision about treatment following an ACL rupture. The shared decision-making tools include a patient information leaflet and an option grid. We report the protocol for a mixed methods feasibility study, with nested qualitative interviews, to understand feasibility, acceptability, indicators of effectiveness and implementation factors of these shared decision-making tools. Methods A single centre non-randomised feasibility study will be conducted with 20 patients. Patients diagnosed with an ACL rupture following magnetic resonance imaging will be identified from an orthopaedic clinic. The shared decision-making tools will be delivered during a clinical consultation with a physiotherapist. The primary feasibility outcomes include: recruitment rate, fidelity, acceptability and follow-up questionnaire completion. The secondary outcome is the satisfaction with decision scale. The nested qualitative interview will explore experience of using the shared decision-making tool to understand acceptability, implementation factors and areas for further refinement. Discussion This study will determine the feasibility of using a newly developed shared decision-making tool designed to support patients to make a decision about treatment of their ACL rupture. The acceptability and indicators of effectiveness will also be explored. In the long term, the shared decision-making tools may improve service and patient outcomes and ensure cost-effectiveness for the NHS; ensuring those most likely to benefit from surgical treatment proceed along this pathway. Trial Registration Pending registration on ISRCTN.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0