Analyzing of Rock Physics Models for 3D and 4D Seismic Feasibility Study in the Carbonate Reservoirs and Developing an Hybrid Algorithm | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Analyzing of Rock Physics Models for 3D and 4D Seismic Feasibility Study in the Carbonate Reservoirs and Developing an Hybrid Algorithm Saghi Jalini, Reza Falahat This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3343605/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Rock physics models provide a quantitative relationship between reservoir parameters and seismic response. Most rock physics models were developed for specific reservoirs/conditions that only cover the variation of some of the reservoir parameters. Therefore, hybrid models have been formed to overcome at the limitations of individual models. However, the hybrid models still contain some of the original limitations that prevent the direct application of these models on the 3D and 4D seismic feasibility studies. This study employs five of the most well-known rock physics models to analyze their advantages and limitations. Then, an integrated model (Improved Shiri-Falahat (ISF)) is developed to cover the main parameters of a 4D seismic interpretation, including pressure and fluid saturation variation, mineralogy, porosity, and pore type. A set of sensitivity analyses are performed on the six models. The results identify the ISF method as the most sensitive model to variation of major reservoir static and dynamic properties. Furthermore, the six models are used to estimate compressional and shear velocity logs in an oil field. The results are compared with the measured sonic logs, where the ISF method provides the least RMS error, 8.11% for compressional and 7.26% for shear velocities, respectively. Rock Physics Model Carbonate Reservoirs Pore Type Elastic parameters 4D Seismic Feasibility Study Full Text Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-3343605","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":235201931,"identity":"aea98d1f-a57c-489d-9a2c-dece572a8247","order_by":0,"name":"Saghi Jalini","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Sahand University of Technology","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Saghi","middleName":"","lastName":"Jalini","suffix":""},{"id":235201932,"identity":"373dcf93-1a05-4f05-ada2-cbfb8995759c","order_by":1,"name":"Reza Falahat","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Sahand University of Technology","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Reza","middleName":"","lastName":"Falahat","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2023-09-11 06:22:14","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3343605/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3343605/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":44883819,"identity":"83723d2b-2e73-401a-9680-e4121f4cdf30","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2023-10-18 23:32:41","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":862062,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"JalinipaperV04.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3343605/v1_covered_54eecc90-a52e-4239-b716-64ba8c983048.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"Analyzing of Rock Physics Models for 3D and 4D Seismic Feasibility Study in the Carbonate Reservoirs and Developing an Hybrid Algorithm","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Rock Physics Model, Carbonate Reservoirs, Pore Type, Elastic parameters, 4D Seismic Feasibility Study","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3343605/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3343605/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eRock physics models provide a quantitative relationship between reservoir parameters and seismic response. Most rock physics models were developed for specific reservoirs/conditions that only cover the variation of some of the reservoir parameters. Therefore, hybrid models have been formed to overcome at the limitations of individual models. However, the hybrid models still contain some of the original limitations that prevent the direct application of these models on the 3D and 4D seismic feasibility studies. This study employs five of the most well-known rock physics models to analyze their advantages and limitations. Then, an integrated model (Improved Shiri-Falahat (ISF)) is developed to cover the main parameters of a 4D seismic interpretation, including pressure and fluid saturation variation, mineralogy, porosity, and pore type. A set of sensitivity analyses are performed on the six models. The results identify the ISF method as the most sensitive model to variation of major reservoir static and dynamic properties. Furthermore, the six models are used to estimate compressional and shear velocity logs in an oil field. The results are compared with the measured sonic logs, where the ISF method provides the least RMS error, 8.11% for compressional and 7.26% for shear velocities, respectively.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Analyzing of Rock Physics Models for 3D and 4D Seismic Feasibility Study in the Carbonate Reservoirs and Developing an Hybrid Algorithm","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2023-09-27 15:31:17","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3343605/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"4a330807-dfd0-4b7d-a429-96d1fcf34f71","owner":[],"postedDate":"September 27th, 2023","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2023-10-18T23:24:32+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2023-09-27 15:31:17","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-3343605","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-3343605","identity":"rs-3343605","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"-HB7Z8yhvgn0wM9Nzuekk","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.