Clinical-pathological findings of catamenial pneumothorax: comparison between recurrent cases and non-recurrent cases
This study compared clinical and pathological findings in patients with thoracic endometriosis, finding that endometrial glands in the diaphragm were significantly more common in recurrent catamenial pneumothorax cases.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This study examined clinical and pathological records from 92 women pathologically diagnosed with thoracic endometriosis to characterize catamenial pneumothorax (CP), comparing patients who experienced recurrence versus those who did not. The recurrence rate was high, with 36/92 (39.1%) recurrent cases and 37/92 (40.2%) non-recurrent cases; 19 (20.4%) could not be evaluated. Pathologically, the ratio of endometrial glands in the diaphragm was significantly higher in recurrent cases (66.7% vs. 37.8%, P = 0.01). The paper notes that further research is needed to determine optimal management strategies, especially for CP cases with diaphragmatic endometrial gland involvement. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically thoracic endometriosis presenting as catamenial pneumothorax (a form of ectopic endometriosis).
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,297 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 8 sections
· click to expand
Keywords
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-12T06:13:51.797165+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:18:59.468224+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine