The Minimally Meaningful Effect Size: A Vital Component of Pre-Registrations
preprint
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
This paper argues for incorporating the minimally meaningful effect size into pre-registrations to encourage a priori consideration of practical significance and prevent post hoc interpretation of effect magnitudes.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Psychology is currently experiencing a replication crisis, wherein many attempts to replicate past studies have failed. Pre-registration is a valuable resource to enhance the replicability of research and maintain scientific rigour. However, the incorporation of information regarding effect size magnitude, namely the minimally meaningful effect size (MMES), has yet to be present within pre-registrations. Incorporating an MMES in pre-registrations encourages researchers to make a priori considerations regarding the minimum effect size threshold that must be met for a particular effect to be practically significant. This threshold depends on the research context, which includes study specific factors that interact with the effect size magnitude to determine the meaningfulness of an effect. Pre-registering the MMES will discourage researchers from haphazardly interpreting the magnitude of an effect (HIMEing; e.g., modifying post hoc what is considered meaningful), a behaviour that we deem a questionable research practice. Using a previously published study, we provide an example of how to incorporate the MMES into pre-registrations.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00