Encountering Endometriosis During Planned Myomectomy

In: Obstetrics & Gynecology · 2026 · vol. 147(4S) , pp. 69S · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000006209.37 · W7139959675
article OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-25 ⓘ

This case report demonstrates that concomitant endometriosis often coexists with fibroids, highlighting the importance of preoperative MRI and surgical planning to identify and excise deep endometriosis during myomectomy.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-08 · read from full text ⓘ

This abstract describes a surgical case in which endometriosis was incidentally discovered during a planned myomectomy procedure. The presentation highlights the clinical scenario where pelvic pathology extends beyond the uterus, requiring intraoperative recognition and potential management of ectopic endometrial tissue alongside fibroid removal. No specific patient demographics or statistical outcomes are provided, as the text serves as a brief case report illustration rather than a comprehensive study. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically its incidental discovery during surgery for uterine leiomyomas.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Endometriosis and fibroids commonly present together. In this video, we review the signs and symptoms that indicate endometriosis is likely present in patients with fibroids. We review a surgical case of a planned myomectomy during which endometriosis was identified intraoperatively in order to demonstrate these points. This case illustrates the importance of surgical planning and patient counseling prior to myomectomy when concomitant endometriosis is suspected. OBJECTIVE: To review incidence, symptoms, and presentation of endometriosis and fibroids. To highlight risk factors for concurrent endometriosis in patients with fibroids. To review techniques for endometriosis surgery and tips for optimizing surgical planning and outcomes in patients with concurrent disease. METHODS: 25-year-old G0 female who presented with 8 months of severe pelvic pain, heavy menstrual bleeding, and uterine retroversion. Subsequent MRI showed 4-cm FIGO Type 7 fibroid on the posterior uterine body. Surgical footage is used to demonstrate educational objectives during robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy and excision of endometriosis. RESULTS: During scheduled myomectomy, stage IV endometriosis was noted with significant pelvic adhesive disease between the posterior uterus, fibroid, and adnexa. The fibroid was found to contain pockets of chocolate fluid. Additionally, adhesions and tethering of the rectosigmoid colon, mild bilateral hydrosalpinx, and an obliterated posterior cul-de-sac were also noted. Lysis of adhesions was performed to restore anatomy prior to myomectomy. Following myomectomy, complete excision of endometriosis was performed involving retroperitoneal dissection, ureterolysis, peritonectomy, and excision of deep endometriosis nodules. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatology and exam findings of fibroids may obscure diagnosis of endometriosis. Concomitant endometriosis should be suspected in young, nulliparous patients with severe pelvic pain exacerbated by menstrual cycles and those with central sensitization. In these patients, MRI imaging with IV and rectovaginal contrast gel is recommended for surgical planning. The presence of heterogeneous lesions or T1 hyperintense cystic foci within or involving the myometrium or myomas may be indicative of endometriosis, adenomyosis, or localized adenomyoma. Surgical planning and counseling should be modified accordingly.
Full text 581 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
SGS Abstracts Supplement: Video Café 37Encountering Endometriosis During Planned MyomectomySnyder, A.1; Glowacki, K.2; Morozov, V.1 Author Information 1MedStar Washington Hospital Center/Georgetown University 2Georgetown University School of Medicine Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee, or shareholder of an industry for: TAGG, LapBox. Obstetrics & Gynecology 147(4S):p 69S, April 2026. | DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006209.37 Buy © 2026 by the American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisadenomyosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-19T06:08:44.131677+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-06T06:46:56.404536+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK