Application of Hybrid-Temporal LES to Shock-Induced Boundary Layer Separation in Hyperloop Flows

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract The development of evacuated tube trains (ETT), generally referred to as Hyperloop, has gained significant attention in recent years, offering the potential for high-speed and energy-efficient transportation. Achieving sustainability in high-speed modes of transport requires aerodynamic drag optimisation in order to minimise energy consumption. One of the major challenges in ETTs is the choking of the flow around the pod, which occurs depending on operating conditions defined by the Mach number M∞ and blockage ratio BR, defined as the ratio between cross-sectional pod and tube area. As soon as the choking limit is surpassed, the resulting shock wave at the rear of the pod interacts with the boundary layer, producing a complex flow field behind the pod. The exact type of interaction and corresponding drag working mechanism is highly sensitive to the operating conditions (M∞, BR) with multiple distinct flow regimes recognised in the current literature. The complex nature of the shock-wave boundary layer interactions (SWBLI), the high sensitivity to operating conditions around the choking limit and a moving-wall boundary, leaves common Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) CFD methods with significant challenges in accurately predicting flow characteristics. As much of the early research and development relies on CFD, both computationally affordable and sufficiently reliable results are essential. In this paper, we assess the feasibility of a hybrid RANS-LES approach in form of the Hybrid-Temporal large eddy simulation (HTLES) method, as implemented in STAR-CCM+ as Scale Resolving Hybrid (SRH), for drag and separation location prediction in the case of shock-induced boundary layer separation (SIBLS). We find good numerical stability and reasonable computational requirements for improved spatial and temporal resolution and subsequently improved spectral representation in configurations where SIBLS dominates the rear flow and wake of the pod. These hybrid RANS-LES methods are broadly applicable to a wide range of aeronautical applications, including transonic wing aerodynamics with physics similar to the presented case. Comparisons are conducted with respect to Menter's RANS k-ω SST turbulence model, with results based on previous research by the authors.
Full text 13,073 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Application of Hybrid-Temporal LES to Shock-Induced Boundary Layer Separation in Hyperloop Flows | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Application of Hybrid-Temporal LES to Shock-Induced Boundary Layer Separation in Hyperloop Flows Benedikt Geiben, Marc Havermann, Errol Hale, Cees Bil This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6235079/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 18 Nov, 2025 Read the published version in CEAS Aeronautical Journal → Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract The development of evacuated tube trains (ETT), generally referred to as Hyperloop, has gained significant attention in recent years, offering the potential for high-speed and energy-efficient transportation. Achieving sustainability in high-speed modes of transport requires aerodynamic drag optimisation in order to minimise energy consumption. One of the major challenges in ETTs is the choking of the flow around the pod, which occurs depending on operating conditions defined by the Mach number M∞ and blockage ratio BR, defined as the ratio between cross-sectional pod and tube area. As soon as the choking limit is surpassed, the resulting shock wave at the rear of the pod interacts with the boundary layer, producing a complex flow field behind the pod. The exact type of interaction and corresponding drag working mechanism is highly sensitive to the operating conditions (M∞, BR) with multiple distinct flow regimes recognised in the current literature. The complex nature of the shock-wave boundary layer interactions (SWBLI), the high sensitivity to operating conditions around the choking limit and a moving-wall boundary, leaves common Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) CFD methods with significant challenges in accurately predicting flow characteristics. As much of the early research and development relies on CFD, both computationally affordable and sufficiently reliable results are essential. In this paper, we assess the feasibility of a hybrid RANS-LES approach in form of the Hybrid-Temporal large eddy simulation (HTLES) method, as implemented in STAR-CCM+ as Scale Resolving Hybrid (SRH), for drag and separation location prediction in the case of shock-induced boundary layer separation (SIBLS). We find good numerical stability and reasonable computational requirements for improved spatial and temporal resolution and subsequently improved spectral representation in configurations where SIBLS dominates the rear flow and wake of the pod. These hybrid RANS-LES methods are broadly applicable to a wide range of aeronautical applications, including transonic wing aerodynamics with physics similar to the presented case. Comparisons are conducted with respect to Menter's RANS k-ω SST turbulence model, with results based on previous research by the authors. Hyperloop Transonic Shock-Wave Boundary Layer Interaction CFD Hybrid RANS-LES Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 18 Nov, 2025 Read the published version in CEAS Aeronautical Journal → Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6235079","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":466807065,"identity":"24d6b1bc-9778-4ae6-964a-d74fd9308705","order_by":0,"name":"Benedikt Geiben","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"FH Aachen","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Benedikt","middleName":"","lastName":"Geiben","suffix":""},{"id":466807066,"identity":"2a3f2f3d-5115-416b-ae07-076efa3fe4e0","order_by":1,"name":"Marc Havermann","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"FH Aachen","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Marc","middleName":"","lastName":"Havermann","suffix":""},{"id":466807067,"identity":"5e8408df-fc93-417e-ac5c-18fc58bd2710","order_by":2,"name":"Errol Hale","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"RMIT University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Errol","middleName":"","lastName":"Hale","suffix":""},{"id":466807070,"identity":"577d4ab3-8e3a-41cb-8f29-87cef6d3c4ed","order_by":3,"name":"Cees Bil","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"RMIT University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Cees","middleName":"","lastName":"Bil","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-03-16 00:08:06","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6235079/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6235079/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-025-00921-3","type":"published","date":"2025-11-18T15:57:58+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":96650321,"identity":"bfb7d666-522b-4e36-bc5d-2ea02edcdc05","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-24 16:11:06","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2625318,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"CEASAeronauticalBenediktGeiben.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6235079/v1_covered_9750f5ec-126c-4651-900d-bec6263d485c.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Application of Hybrid-Temporal LES to Shock-Induced Boundary Layer Separation in Hyperloop Flows","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Hyperloop, Transonic, Shock-Wave Boundary Layer Interaction, CFD, Hybrid RANS-LES","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6235079/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6235079/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"The development of evacuated tube trains (ETT), generally referred to as Hyperloop, has gained significant attention in recent years, offering the potential for high-speed and energy-efficient transportation. Achieving sustainability in high-speed modes of transport requires aerodynamic drag optimisation in order to minimise energy consumption. One of the major challenges in ETTs is the choking of the flow around the pod, which occurs depending on operating conditions defined by the Mach number M∞ and blockage ratio BR, defined as the ratio between cross-sectional pod and tube area. As soon as the choking limit is surpassed, the resulting shock wave at the rear of the pod interacts with the boundary layer, producing a complex flow field behind the pod. The exact type of interaction and corresponding drag working mechanism is highly sensitive to the operating conditions (M∞, BR) with multiple distinct flow regimes recognised in the current literature. The complex nature of the shock-wave boundary layer interactions (SWBLI), the high sensitivity to operating conditions around the choking limit and a moving-wall boundary, leaves common Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) CFD methods with significant challenges in accurately predicting flow characteristics. As much of the early research and development relies on CFD, both computationally affordable and sufficiently reliable results are essential. In this paper, we assess the feasibility of a hybrid RANS-LES approach in form of the Hybrid-Temporal large eddy simulation (HTLES) method, as implemented in STAR-CCM+ as Scale Resolving Hybrid (SRH), for drag and separation location prediction in the case of shock-induced boundary layer separation (SIBLS). We find good numerical stability and reasonable computational requirements for improved spatial and temporal resolution and subsequently improved spectral representation in configurations where SIBLS dominates the rear flow and wake of the pod. These hybrid RANS-LES methods are broadly applicable to a wide range of aeronautical applications, including transonic wing aerodynamics with physics similar to the presented case. Comparisons are conducted with respect to Menter's RANS k-ω SST turbulence model, with results based on previous research by the authors.","manuscriptTitle":"Application of Hybrid-Temporal LES to Shock-Induced Boundary Layer Separation in Hyperloop Flows","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-06-08 13:46:11","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6235079/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"2662fef3-66da-458f-b2cd-fbb4a5fd27fa","owner":[],"postedDate":"June 8th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-11-24T16:06:12+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-6235079","link":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-025-00921-3","journal":{"identity":"ceas-aeronautical-journal","isVorOnly":false,"title":"CEAS Aeronautical Journal"},"publishedOn":"2025-11-18 15:57:58","publishedOnDateReadable":"November 18th, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2025-06-08 13:46:11","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1007/s13272-025-00921-3","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-025-00921-3","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6235079","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6235079","identity":"rs-6235079","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00