Contact Lens Wear Alters Transcriptional Responses toPseudomonas aeruginosain Both the Corneal Epithelium and the Bacteria

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Purpose Healthy corneas resist colonization by virtually all microbes yet contact lens wear can predispose the cornea to sight-threatening infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Here, we explored how lens wear changes corneal epithelium transcriptional responses to P. aeruginosa and its impact on bacterial gene expression. Methods Male and female C57BL/6J mice were fitted with a contact lens on one eye for 24 h. After lens removal, corneas were immediately challenged for 4 h with P. aeruginosa . A separate group of naïve mice were similarly challenged with bacteria. Bacteria-challenged eyes were compared to uninoculated naive controls as was lens wear alone. Total RNA-sequencing determined corneal epithelium and bacterial gene expression. Results Prior lens wear profoundly altered the corneal response to P. aeruginosa , including: upregulated pattern-recognition receptors ( tlr3, nod1 ), downregulated lectin pathway of complement activation ( masp1 ), amplified upregulation of tcf7 , gpr55, ifi205, wfdc2 (immune defense) and further suppression of efemp1 (corneal stromal integrity). Without lens wear, P. aeruginosa upregulated mitochondrial and ubiquinone metabolism genes. Lens wear alone upregulated axl, grn, tcf7, gpr55 (immune defense) and downregulated Ca2 + -dependent genes necab1, snx31 and npr3 . P. aeruginosa exposure to prior lens wearing vs. naïve corneas upregulated bacterial genes of virulence ( popD ), its regulation ( rsmY , PA1226) and antimicrobial resistance ( arnB , oprR ). Conclusion Prior lens wear impacts corneal epithelium gene expression altering its responses to P. aeruginosa and how P. aeruginosa responds to it favoring virulence, survival and adaptation. Impacted genes and associated networks provide avenues for research to better understand infection pathogenesis.
Full text 1,891 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose Healthy corneas resist colonization by virtually all microbes yet contact lens wear can predispose the cornea to sight-threatening infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Here, we explored how lens wear changes corneal epithelium transcriptional responses to P. aeruginosa and its impact on bacterial gene expression.

Methods

Male and female C57BL/6J mice were fitted with a contact lens on one eye for 24 h. After lens removal, corneas were immediately challenged for 4 h with P. aeruginosa. A separate group of naïve mice were similarly challenged with bacteria. Bacteria-challenged eyes were compared to uninoculated naive controls as was lens wear alone. Total RNA-sequencing determined corneal epithelium and bacterial gene expression.

Results

Prior lens wear profoundly altered the corneal response to P. aeruginosa, including: upregulated pattern-recognition receptors (tlr3, nod1), downregulated lectin pathway of complement activation (masp1), amplified upregulation of tcf7, gpr55, ifi205, wfdc2 (immune defense) and further suppression of efemp1 (corneal stromal integrity). Without lens wear, P. aeruginosa upregulated mitochondrial and ubiquinone metabolism genes. Lens wear alone upregulated axl, grn, tcf7, gpr55 (immune defense) and downregulated Ca2+-dependent genes necab1, snx31 and npr3. P. aeruginosa exposure to prior lens wearing vs. naïve corneas upregulated bacterial genes of virulence (popD), its regulation (rsmY, PA1226) and antimicrobial resistance (arnB, oprR).

Conclusion

Prior lens wear impacts corneal epithelium gene expression altering its responses to P. aeruginosa and how P. aeruginosa responds to it favoring virulence, survival and adaptation. Impacted genes and associated networks provide avenues for research to better understand infection pathogenesis. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00