The Young Innovators of Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering.

OA: closed
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash+body, 2026-08-25

This special issue profiles thirteen young investigators in cellular and molecular bioengineering who present research on nuclear mechanics, drug delivery systems, and novel biomaterials for cell function control.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-25 · read from full text

This editorial introduces a special issue of Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering profiling young faculty researchers, highlighting their diverse work in systems biology, drug delivery, cell mechanics, and biomaterials. The text summarizes specific studies, including one by Pamela Kreeger’s laboratory that utilizes extracellular matrix types to develop an in vitro model for endometriosis progression. Other featured research addresses platelet aggregation, cardiac tissue engineering, and fibrosis mechanisms through novel microfluidic platforms and material science approaches. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 8,740 characters · extracted from oa-pdf · click to expand
The Young Innovators of Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering To highlight ‘‘the best and brightest’’ young faculty working in the area of cellular and molecular bioen- gineering, the Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering journal created a special issue featuring the ‘‘Young Innovators’’ within the field. The field is continuing to grow and, as such, the number of new faculty working in this developing area continues to expand. This Young Innovators issue was designed to profile the best research being carried out by the most talented assistant professors working in the area of cellular and molecular bioengineering. In mid 2013, advertisements were created and widely distributed to solicit self-nominations for the Young Innovator special issue. Self-nominations were an important part of the process to encourage young investigators to promote themselves rather than asking for a more established investigator to help in the nomination process. The only criteria of the competi- tion were that applicants must be current BMES members in good standing, and at the rank of assistant professor in a tenure track position or the equivalent. As part of the self-nomination process, each investi- gator submitted a biosketch and abstract. These were then reviewed and scored, and the most meritorious applications were selected based on the track record of accomplishments of the applicant and the quality and importance of the abstract. After being selected, the applicant was invited to submit a full-length manu- script that underwent a rigorous peer review process following the guidelines of the journal. Within this inaugural special issue, the 13 investi- gators and their research teams have published their most cutting edge work and have set the bar high for next year’s competition of the 2015 CMBE Young Innovators. Overall, the quality is exceptionally strong and represents some of the most exciting work cur- rently being pursued in the field of Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering. Articles from a diverse ar- ray of research under the umbrella of ‘‘Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering’’ are featured, including work from areas such as systems biology, drug deliv- ery, cell mechanics and biomaterials. Unique to this issue of the journal, each article is accompanied by a short biography of the corresponding author. In this issue, Jan Lammerding and colleagues use a novel microfluidic platform to investigate the role of nuclear deformability in 3D migration. Impor- tantly, they demonstrate that nuclear translation is a rate-limiting step, indicating that nuclear mechanics, mediated by lamins, is a critical component to cell invasion and migration. Also in the area of mechanics, Allen Liu et al . demonstrate a novel mechanism by which mechanosensitive ion channels can be opened through integrin-cytoskeletal linked forces. While these channels are present in bacteria, there is the potential to express them in mammalian cells for use in drug delivery and transport applications. Several Young Innovators have developed novel drug delivery systems or drug testing platforms that have the potential to change how drugs are designed, fabricated or tested. Kathryn Miller-Jensen’s labora- tory contributed a paper on the efficacy of co-drugging in anti-HIV therapy, providing evidence that decisions on whether to co-drug are patient-specific and can be optimized quantitatively to achieve robust treatment and minimize side effects. These results underscore the importance of personalized medicine in HIV treat- ment. Junghae Suh and her lab describe a novel approach to increasing the efficiency of gene delivery via engineered, MMP-activatable viruses. Since MMPs are overexpressed in a number of diseases, including cancer and atherosclerosis, these agents could find broad clinical use. A novel drug testing platform is described by Hossein Tavana and colleagues using a biphasic mixing platform as a means for high throughput fabrication of tumor spheroids. Such a platform could greatly streamline chemotherapeutic drug screening. Novel materials to control cell function is another core theme of the work of multiple Young Innovators. Adam Feinberg’s laboratory describes a new ‘‘shrink wrapping’’ methodology in this issue that can be used to envelope cells in a defined extracellular matrix. Their approach offers a new way to recreate the com- plexities found in the extracellular matrix in vivo . Thomas Gaborski’s lab uses novel nano-porous sub- strates to demonstrate that co-culture of adi- pose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) with endothelial cells (ECs) can induce the differentiation of ADSC into EC and induce ADSC to adopt features of pericytes. The use of these novel substrates offers the opportunity to study co-cultures that are in very close (nm) proximity without cell–cell contact, mimicking the in vivo microenvironment of numerous tissues. Krishanu Saha and colleagues explore the effects of nanofibrous substrates on the reprogramming of fibroblasts into Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering , Vol. 7, No. 3, September 2014 (/C2112014) pp. 291–292 DOI: 10.1007/s12195-014-0352-9 1865-5025/09/1400-0291/0 /C2112014 Biomedical Engineering Society 291 iPSCs, a key step in developing scaffolds which direct cell differentiation. Also in this issue, Ankur Singh’s lab describes the fabrication of novel materials that allow for the control of both cell-adhesive chemistry and substrate mechanics. These materials enable the encapsulation of cells within an array format where mechanics and ligand availability can be indepen- dently tuned, providing a functional platform for screening. In several exciting papers, cellular engineering approaches have revealed interesting insights into disease progression. Pamela Kreeger’s lab has shown that extracellular matrix type is critical to the devel- opment of an in vitro model of endometriosis. Given our limited understanding of endometriosis, limited treatment options, and the small (but growing) com- munity of engineers working in this field, Kreeger’s paper represents a critical step in establishing a basis for engineering approaches to probe mechanisms underlying endometriosis progression. Keith Neeves and colleagues used a microfluidic vascular injury model and a nitric oxide-releasing polymer to inves- tigate the role of nitric oxide signaling in platelet aggregation. His unique approach enabled the description of the relative roles of soluble guanyl cy- clase dependent and independent pathways, an important finding to the control of clotting. In work investigating cardiomyocytes, Lauren Black’s group contributed a paper demonstrating that depolariza- tion can help maintain cell proliferation in culture. These findings could have a significant impact on cardiac tissue engineering for pediatric patients, where limitations in cardiomyocyte proliferation can hinder the development of engineered cardiac tissue. David Merryman’s laboratory used a combination of experiment and modeling to dissect the aSMA path- ways that lead to myofibroblast differentiation from fibroblasts. These results point to specific intracellular targets to control fibroblast differentiation, a key component of fibrosis. The Young Innovators will present these findings at the 2014 Annual Biomedical Engineering Society Meeting in San Antonio, TX, in October. There will be two sessions dedicated to the Young Innovators, and we encourage you to attend and learn more about the work ongoing in their labs. It will be a wonderful opportunity to hear some of the best work being done by the rising stars of cellular and molecular bioengineering. The 2015 Young Innovators competition is now accepting self-nominations until November 15, 2014. Interested BMES members who hold a tenure track position at the rank of Assistant Professor (or equiv- alent) should submit a 200-word abstract and a 2-page NIH-style biosketch to Editor-in-Chief Michael King, at [email protected]. Please consider nominating yourself or passing along the information to your eli- gible colleagues. We look forward to introducing the 2015 Class of Young Innovators at the 2015 Annual BMES Meeting in Tampa, Florida! Cynthia A. Reinhart-King Department of Biomedical Engineering Cornell University, 302 Weill Hall, 526 Campus Rd, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Electronic mail: [email protected] DAVID J. MOONEY School of Engineering and Applied Sciences and Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 01238, USA DAVID V. SCHAFFER Departments of Bioengineering and Chemical Engineering, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA REINHART-KING et al.292

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-pdf

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-06T09:34:12.023084+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-10T06:36:06.991349+00:00