Idiosyncrasies of Cistanthe ipniana Hershk. (C. sect. Rosulatae; Montiaceae)

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Cistanthe ipniana Hershk. [C. sect. Rosulatae (Reiche) Hershk.; Montiaceae] was described briefly based on collections from Huasco Province, Atacama Region, Chile. The species is distinctive in having flower morphology essentially identical to that of C. litoralis and C. longiscapa, to which it is very closely related genetically, but a distinctive vegetative form identical to that of C. thyrsoidea (Reiche) Peralta & D.I.Ford of the more distantly related C. sect. Thyrsoideae Hershk. Although sympatric, there is no evidence for potential or historical gene flow between these species. Additional collections and observations of collected plants cultivated ex situ permits a more detailed description of the species, taking into account variation, fruit and seed characters, and senescence behavior. The floral bracts in C. ipniana are described as being not only unique to this among all Cistanthe species, but remarkably similar to the floral bracts of some more remotely related Philippiamra Kuntze and Calyptridium Nutt. species (Cistantheae; Calyptridinae). But the latter taxa have much smaller flowers. The similarities in vegetative habit and distinctive floral bracts of C. ipniana to remotely related Cistantheae is attributed to convergent evolution, and the difference between these traits in C. ipniana and its closest relatives is attributed not to some sort of “adaptive” evolution that might be presumed by mainstream evolutionary biology, but to evolutionary “natural drift” and its corollary, the Principle of Evolutionary Idiosyncraticity.
Full text 2,275 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Cistanthe ipniana Hershk. [C. sect. Rosulatae (Reiche) Hershk.; Montiaceae] was described briefly based on collections from Huasco Province, Atacama Region, Chile. The species is distinctive in having flower morphology essentially identical to that of C. litoralis and C. longiscapa, to which it is very closely related genetically, but a distinctive vegetative form identical to that of C. thyrsoidea (Reiche) Peralta & D.I.Ford of the more distantly related C. sect. Thyrsoideae Hershk. Although sympatric, there is no evidence for potential or historical gene flow between these species. Additional collections and observations of collected plants cultivated ex situ permits a more detailed description of the species, taking into account variation, fruit and seed characters, and senescence behavior. The floral bracts in C. ipniana are described as being not only unique to this among all Cistanthe species, but remarkably similar to the floral bracts of some more remotely related Philippiamra Kuntze and Calyptridium Nutt. species (Cistantheae; Calyptridinae). But the latter taxa have much smaller flowers. The similarities in vegetative habit and distinctive floral bracts of C. ipniana to remotely related Cistantheae is attributed to convergent evolution, and the difference between these traits in C. ipniana and its closest relatives is attributed not to some sort of “adaptive” evolution that might be presumed by mainstream evolutionary biology, but to evolutionary “natural drift” and its corollary, the Principle of Evolutionary Idiosyncraticity. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2SQ1C Biodiversity Cistanthe, Montiaceae, Chile, taxonomy Published: 2025-12-23 03:43 Last Updated: 2025-12-23 05:14 CC-BY Attribution-No Derivatives 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: none Data and Code Availability Statement: N/A Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00