Analysis of postoperative complications that require a repeated procedure based on the material collected in 2009–2014 in the Department of Gynecologic Oncology of the Institute of Oncology in Warsaw
article
OA: green
CC0
Abstract
The paper presents the frequency of conducting relaparotomies and discusses indications for reoperations after primary gynecologic surgeries due to oncological diseases. Operations and reoperations were conducted in the Department of Gynecologic Oncology of Maria Skłodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology in Warsaw, Poland from 2009 to 2014. In total, 3,917 procedures due to reproductive organ neoplasms were conducted in the investigated period. The main indications were ovarian carcinoma, endometrial cancer and cervical cancer. Repeated urgent surgical interventions were needed in 116 patients, which constitutes 2.96% of all operated women. The frequency of repeated surgeries within the peritoneal cavity in gynecology, as reported in the literature, ranges from 1% to 4.7% and concerns primary indications resulting from non-malignant pathologies of the reproductive organs. The analysis involved early and urgent reoperations conducted within 48 hours after the primary procedure. Patients reoperated because of sudden progression of the diseases and those who underwent exploratory laparotomy within 60 days or who had a palliative surgery were excluded from the study. The main indication for a necessary urgent intervention was peritoneal bleeding. Other indications included: obstruction, peritonitis, bowel perforation, abdominal wall hematoma, intestinal anastomosis dehiscence and urinary complications. The mortality in the group of patients who required relaparotomy was 4.31%. An early diagnosis of complications requiring a repeated surgical intervention and implementation of appropriate management affect the outcome considerably and significantly decrease treatment-associated mortality.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (20)
- W141259030 via openalex
- W204768781 via openalex
- W1553223477 via openalex
- W1841975522 via openalex
- W1893254328 via openalex
- W1987870682 via openalex
- W1996464076 via openalex
- W2027783804 via openalex
- W2060939688 via openalex
- W2073507075 via openalex
- W2086600876 via openalex
- W2118660267 via openalex
- W2136410984 via openalex
- W2261229690 via openalex
- W2403290461 via openalex
- W2423906215 via openalex
- W2461524495 via openalex
- W2466089359 via openalex
- W4241226259 via openalex
- W4249412602 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK