Dolor pélvico crónico: enfoque multidisciplinario

article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-07

Chronic pelvic pain requires a multidisciplinary approach integrating pharmacological, psychological, and potentially surgical interventions, considering the condition's complexity and psychosocial factors.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

C h ronic pelvic pain is a great challenge both for the general practitioner and the specialist, due to the complexity of the structures present in this anatomic region, their rich innervation with visceral, sympathetic and parasympathetic components; and the multiple symptomatic pictures covered by the definition. To all the above has to be added the relevant role of psychological and social aspects that may play a role in the development and perpetuation of such a pain. Thus, frequently the patient has already visited several specialists and undergone several diagnostic tests without satisfactory results. Given the complexity of these conditions, patients with c h ronic pelvic pain must be assessed with a multidisciplinary approach, including in the anamnesis an assessment of his/her family and psychosocial environment. The therapeutic attitude should be based in all the above, using all the pharmacological and psychological re s o u rces available and reserving surgery aewith laparoscopy having an increasingly relevant roleae as the last option, since its results are uncertain in such an heterogeneous group of patients. © 2000 Sociedad Espanola del Dolor. Published by Aran Ediciones, S.A.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (24)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK