Abstract
Speech representations in the human brain do not simply mirror the instantaneous speech signal; rather, they display several properties that are hypothesized to facilitate the integration of speech sounds into words. In particular, neural encodings of speech maintain information that has dissipated from the acoustics, and have also been argued to abstract over variability in how individual speech sounds are produced. Here, we investigate how such characteristics could arise. We introduce a computational framework that uses modern neural network models from speech technology to examine two factors in particular: the learning mechanism and the learning input. We find that self-supervised models trained without lexical or semantic feedback developed temporal dynamics similar to brain representations, regardless of whether they were trained on speech or non-speech audio. In contrast, only models trained on speech learn to abstract over variability due to word position and phonetic context. Overall, our results suggest that domain-general learning mechanisms can lead to several important properties of speech representations, but in some cases require domain-specific input in order to do so. Significance Statement Understanding speech often feels effortless, but in fact mapping speech sounds into words involves complex computation. Experimental neuroscience has identified key properties in brain signals that may support this computation, but why and how these properties arise is still unclear. We examined these properties in computational models and found that they occurred in models that weren’t given lexical or semantic feedback, but were trained to predict the acoustics of the speech signal. This suggests such properties can develop from domain-general learning combined with domain-specific input. Moreover, some properties even arose in models that were trained on non-speech audio. Overall, our work illustrates how computational modeling can help reveal the conditions under which neural properties emerge.
Full text
2,327 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
Speech representations in the human brain do not simply mirror the instantaneous speech signal; rather, they display several properties that are hypothesized to facilitate the integration of speech sounds into words. In particular, neural encodings of speech maintain information that has dissipated from the acoustics, and have also been argued to abstract over variability in how individual speech sounds are produced. Here, we investigate how such characteristics could arise. We introduce a computational framework that uses modern neural network models from speech technology to examine two factors in particular: the learning mechanism and the learning input. We find that self-supervised models trained without lexical or semantic feedback developed temporal dynamics similar to brain representations, regardless of whether they were trained on speech or non-speech audio. In contrast, only models trained on speech learn to abstract over variability due to word position and phonetic context. Overall, our results suggest that domain-general learning mechanisms can lead to several important properties of speech representations, but in some cases require domain-specific input in order to do so.
Significance Statement Understanding speech often feels effortless, but in fact mapping speech sounds into words involves complex computation. Experimental neuroscience has identified key properties in brain signals that may support this computation, but why and how these properties arise is still unclear. We examined these properties in computational models and found that they occurred in models that weren’t given lexical or semantic feedback, but were trained to predict the acoustics of the speech signal. This suggests such properties can develop from domain-general learning combined with domain-specific input. Moreover, some properties even arose in models that were trained on non-speech audio. Overall, our work illustrates how computational modeling can help reveal the conditions under which neural properties emerge.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
O.L, N.F, S.G. designed research; O.L performed research; O.L analyzed data; H.T, S.G supervised data analyses; O.L, H.T, N.F, S.G. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.