Digital Divide or Educational Divide? The Impact of Social Media on COVID-19 Vaccination in Middle-Aged and Older Adults

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT The spread of disinformation and harmful content on social media is well-known. However, most research focuses on the negative influence of social media on the well-being of adolescents and teenagers. We used data from the 2022 Health and Retirement Study (n=4,038) to examine how the use of social media (i.e., Facebook, Twitter [X], and Instagram) was associated with vaccination uptake for Covid-19 among U.S. middle-aged and older adults. Frequency of social media use was measured on a scale ranging from 0=never to 5=daily. In our study (mean (SD) age: 69.4 (9.7) years), approximately 35.9% of participants used social media daily while 34.3% never did. Multivariable logistic regression models showed that social media use was not directly associated with Covid-19 vaccination. However, there was a significant interaction between social media use and educational attainment. Among adults who frequently used social media, those with low education were significantly less likely to be vaccinated for Covid-19 compared to their more educated counterparts ( P for interaction =.008). These results remained after accounting for differences in participants’ sociodemographic background, health status, religiosity, and other factors. Furthermore, social media use was not associated with vaccination for influenza, pneumonia, or shingles. Our results highlight the importance of delivering tailored public health messages when promoting vaccine uptake among less-educated older populations.
Full text 23,784 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Digital Divide or Educational Divide? The Impact of Social Media on COVID-19 Vaccination in Middle-Aged and Older Adults | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Digital Divide or Educational Divide? The Impact of Social Media on COVID-19 Vaccination in Middle-Aged and Older Adults Mason Dupre , View ORCID Profile Truls Østbye , Teah M. Bayless , View ORCID Profile Hanzhang Xu doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.05.25335178 Mason Dupre 1 Cary Academy , Cary, NC Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Truls Østbye 2 Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University , Durham, NC M.D., Ph.D. Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Truls Østbye Teah M. Bayless 2 Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University , Durham, NC DO Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Hanzhang Xu 3 Duke University School of Nursing, Duke University , Durham, NC 4 Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University , Durham, NC Ph.D. Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Hanzhang Xu For correspondence: hanzhang.xu{at}duke.edu Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Data/Code Preview PDF ABSTRACT The spread of disinformation and harmful content on social media is well-known. However, most research focuses on the negative influence of social media on the well-being of adolescents and teenagers. We used data from the 2022 Health and Retirement Study (n=4,038) to examine how the use of social media (i.e., Facebook, Twitter [X], and Instagram) was associated with vaccination uptake for Covid-19 among U.S. middle-aged and older adults. Frequency of social media use was measured on a scale ranging from 0=never to 5=daily. In our study (mean (SD) age: 69.4 (9.7) years), approximately 35.9% of participants used social media daily while 34.3% never did. Multivariable logistic regression models showed that social media use was not directly associated with Covid-19 vaccination. However, there was a significant interaction between social media use and educational attainment. Among adults who frequently used social media, those with low education were significantly less likely to be vaccinated for Covid-19 compared to their more educated counterparts ( P for interaction =.008). These results remained after accounting for differences in participants’ sociodemographic background, health status, religiosity, and other factors. Furthermore, social media use was not associated with vaccination for influenza, pneumonia, or shingles. Our results highlight the importance of delivering tailored public health messages when promoting vaccine uptake among less-educated older populations. INTRODUCTION The widespread use of social media platforms such as Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), and Instagram has increasingly transformed how individuals access and consume health information. 1 , 2 Although numerous studies have documented the impact of social media on the health and well-being of adolescents and young adults, 3 – 6 much less is known about how social media use influences adults at older ages. The Covid-19 pandemic was an especially notable period that amplified the consumption of social media in growing segments of the adult population seeking to maintain social connections and obtain health-related information. 1 , 7 However, these platforms also exposed users to inaccurate/deceptive content and misleading public health information. Prior studies have shown that individuals with lower levels of educational attainment are more susceptible to health misinformation across a wide range of health conditions. 8 – 10 Studies have also shown that individuals with inadequate (or inaccurate) health literacy are less likely to get vaccinations or follow other health behavior recommendations. 11 , 12 The current research report used data from a nationally-representative sample of U.S. adults aged 50 and older to examine whether the frequency of social media use influenced the uptake of Covid-19 vaccination and whether educational attainment had an impact on the likelihood of vaccination. METHODS Data The analysis used nationally-representative data of U.S. middle-aged and older adults from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). The HRS is sponsored by the National Institute on Aging (grant number: U01AG009740) and is conducted by the University of Michigan. 13 The HRS is the largest ongoing longitudinal study of adults over age 50 that has interviewed more than 40,000 participants since it was launched in 1992. 13 , 14 The current study used data from 4,284 respondents aged 50 and older who participated in the 2022 Leave-Behind Questionnaire that assessed the use of social media. Respondents with missing data on study variables were omitted (n=246, 5%). The final analytical sample included 4,038 HRS participants. Measures Vaccinated for Covid-19 Participants were asked if they ever had a Covid-19 vaccine (yes or no). Two participants reported not knowing if they were vaccinated and were coded as “no.” Overall, 89.5% of HRS participants reported that they had been vaccinated and 10.5% reported that they had not been vaccinated (standard deviation [SD]=0.31). Participants were also asked if they had been vaccinated for influenza (75.1% yes; SD=0.43), pneumonia (43.4% yes; SD=0.50), and/or shingles (29.1% yes; SD=0.45). Social Media Use To assess social media use, participants were asked how often they accessed social network sites like Facebook, Twitter [X], or Instagram. Responses ranged on a scale from 0 (never) to 5 (daily). Overall, 34.3% of HRS respondents reported never using social media and 35.9% reported daily use (SD=1.7). Covariates We included measures for age (years), sex (male or female), race and ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, or non-Hispanic other race), region of residence (Northeast, Midwest, South, or West), educational attainment (years), marital status (never married, married, divorced, or widowed), religious attendance (1+ times per year, 2-3 times per month, once a week, or more than weekly), frequency of computer use (continuous scale 1-7), frequency of using the internet for health information (never, once a year, once a month, several times a week, or daily), and reported doctor-diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, and cancer (yes or no; for each condition). Statistical Analysis We examined the distributions of participants’ sociodemographic, behavioral, and health-related characteristics for the overall sample and by Covid-19 vaccination status using chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression models were then used to examine the association between frequency of social media use and Covid-19 vaccination status. We tested an interaction term between social media use and educational attainment to examine whether the association between social media use and vaccination was modified by years of education. Finally, we assessed whether the associations were observed for reported vaccination for influenza, pneumonia, and/or shingles. All analyses were performed using Stata 18.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX). P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS The mean age of study participants was 69.4 years (SD=9.7), 59.3% were female, and the majority were non-Hispanic White adults (61.3%) ( Table 1 ). Overall vaccination rates for Covid-19 were high (89.5%; SD=0.31) and participants who were older, married, and had a history of chronic disease were more liked to be vaccinated. Table 2 presents the results from the logistic regression models showing the association between frequency of social media use and Covid-19 vaccination status. Social media use was not directly associated with being vaccinated for Covid-19 in the unadjusted (Model 1) or fully-adjusted model (Model 2). However, a significant interaction emerged between social media use and educational attainment (Model 3). Among adults who frequently used social media, those with low education were significantly less likely to be vaccinated for COVID-19 compared to their more educated counterparts ( P for interaction =.008). Figure 2 illustrates the differences in the participants’ predicted probability of Covid-19 vaccination by frequency of social media use and years of education (estimated from Model 3). Additional analyses (Supplementary Tables 1-3) further showed that social media use was not significantly associated with inoculation for other reported vaccines, including influenza, pneumonia, and shingles. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 1. Characteristics of Study Participants by Covid-19 Vaccination, Health and Retirement Study, 2022 (n=4,038) View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 2. Model Estimates of the Association Between Social Media Use, Education, and Vaccination for Covid-19, HRS 2022 (n=4,038) Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Predicted Probability of Covid-19 Vaccination by Social Media Use and Education, Health and Retirement Study, 2022 (n=4,038) Note : Estimates obtained from Table 2 (Model 3) adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity, geographic region, marital status, religious attendance, frequency of computer use, frequency of internet use for health information, and reported diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. DISCUSSION Our findings from a national cohort showed a complex association between social media use and vaccination for Covid-19 among U.S. middle-aged and older adults. Results showed that social media use was not directly associated with getting vaccinated for Covid-19. However, we found that the association between social media use and vaccination varied significantly by years of educational attainment. In adults who frequently used social media, results showed that those with low education were significantly less likely to get vaccinated for Covid-19. Furthermore, we found that social media use among middle-aged and older adults did not influence being vaccinated for influenza, pneumonia, or shingles. The central finding that less-educated frequent-users of social media were less likely to receive Covid-19 vaccination suggests that social media may be a conduit for vaccine hesitancy among vulnerable populations with lower educational attainment. This finding aligns with previous research documenting the spread of Covid-19 vaccine misinformation on major social media platforms. 10 This also suggests that adults with lower levels of education—and likewise health literacy—may be more susceptible to such content. 9 Furthermore, the specificity of the association to Covid-19 vaccination, and not with other vaccinations (i.e., influenza, pneumonia, etc.), likely reflects the widespread politicization and disinformation surrounding vaccination for Covid-19 in the United States. Unlike more established vaccines familiar to middle-aged and older adults, vaccination for Covid-19 became a lightning-rod for intense debate and the spread of misinformation campaigns. 15 Furthermore, the “shelter-in-place” policies that were enacted, and the increasing culture of remote work that followed, likely amplified the role of social media in the (mis)communication of health information during this time. This study had several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, we could not directly assess the specific content and/or quality of health information encountered on social media. Similarly, social media use was measured broadly across platforms (Facebook, Instagram, etc.) and did not distinguish between passive consumption and active engagement with the content. The limited sample size also precluded additional analyses of potentially meaningful differences in population subgroups (e.g., among demographic subgroups, persons with pre-existing health conditions, etc.). Finally, the analyses were based on cross-sectional data that prevented any causal interpretations. In summary, the results of this report highlight the importance of delivering tailored public health messages when promoting vaccine uptake among less educated and vulnerable older populations. Public health agencies and health care providers should consider individuals’ educational attainment when designing and deploying communication strategies to counter the potential misinformation on social media sites that can be widely consumed by middle-aged and older adults. Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors REFERENCES 1. ↵ Neely S , Eldredge C , Sanders R. Health Information Seeking Behaviors on Social Media During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among American Social Networking Site Users: Survey Study . Journal of Medical Internet Research . 2021 ; 23 ( 6 ): e29802 . doi: 10.2196/29802 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 2. ↵ Chen J , Wang Y. Social Media Use for Health Purposes: Systematic Review . J Med Internet Res . 2021 ; 23 ( 5 ): e17917 . doi: 10.2196/17917 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. ↵ Khalaf AM , Alubied AA , Khalaf AM , Rifaey AA . The Impact of Social Media on the Mental Health of Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review . Cureus . 15 ( 8 ): e42990 . doi: 10.7759/cureus.42990 OpenUrl CrossRef 4. Dodemaide P , Merolli M , Hill N , Joubert L. Do Social Media Impact Young Adult Mental Health and Well-Being? A Qualitative Study . Br J Soc Work . 2022 ; 52 ( 8 ): 4664 – 4683 . doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcac078 OpenUrl CrossRef 5. Popat A , Tarrant C. Exploring adolescents’ perspectives on social media and mental health and well-being – A qualitative literature review . Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry . 2023 ; 28 ( 1 ): 323 – 337 . doi: 10.1177/13591045221092884 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 6. ↵ Di Cara NH , Winstone L , Sloan L , Davis OSP , Haworth CMA . The mental health and well-being profile of young adults using social media . npj Mental Health Res . 2022 ; 1 ( 1 ): 11 . doi: 10.1038/s44184-022-00011-w OpenUrl CrossRef 7. ↵ Jennings W , Stoker G , Bunting H , et al. Lack of Trust, Conspiracy Beliefs, and Social Media Use Predict COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy . Vaccines . 2021 ; 9 ( 6 ): 593 . doi: 10.3390/vaccines9060593 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 8. ↵ Chandrasekaran R , T MS, Moustakas E. Racial and Demographic Disparities in Susceptibility to Health Misinformation on Social Media: National Survey-Based Analysis . Journal of Medical Internet Research . 2024 ; 26 ( 1 ): e55086 . doi: 10.2196/55086 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 9. ↵ Nan X , Wang Y , Thier K. Why do people believe health misinformation and who is at risk? A systematic review of individual differences in susceptibility to health misinformation . Social Science & Medicine . 2022 ; 314 : 115398 . doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115398 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 10. ↵ Carletto E , Carson KA , Yeh HC , et al. A Pandemic of Misinformation: Understanding Influences on Beliefs in Health and Conspiracy Myths . J GEN INTERN MED . 2025 ; 40 ( 2 ): 368 – 375 . doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08867-8 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 11. ↵ Lorini C , Santomauro F , Donzellini M , et al. Health literacy and vaccination: A systematic review . Hum Vaccin Immunother . 2017 ; 14 ( 2 ): 478 – 488 . doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1392423 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 12. ↵ Isonne C , Iera J , Sciurti A , et al. How well does vaccine literacy predict intention to vaccinate and vaccination status? A systematic review and meta-analysis . Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics . 2024 ; 20 ( 1 ): 2300848 . doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2300848 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 13. ↵ Sonnega A , Faul JD , Ofstedal MB , Langa KM , Phillips JW , Weir DR . Cohort Profile: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) . Int J Epidemiol . 2014 ; 43 ( 2 ): 576 – 585 . doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu067 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 14. ↵ Fisher GG , Ryan LH . Overview of the Health and Retirement Study and Introduction to the Special Issue . Work Aging Retire . 2018 ; 4 ( 1 ): 1 – 9 . doi: 10.1093/workar/wax032 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 15. ↵ Pierri F , DeVerna MR , Yang KC , Axelrod D , Bryden J , Menczer F. One Year of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation on Twitter: Longitudinal Study . J Med Internet Res . 2023 ; 25 : e42227 . doi: 10.2196/42227 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted September 07, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Digital Divide or Educational Divide? The Impact of Social Media on COVID-19 Vaccination in Middle-Aged and Older Adults Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Digital Divide or Educational Divide? The Impact of Social Media on COVID-19 Vaccination in Middle-Aged and Older Adults Mason Dupre , Truls Østbye , Teah M. Bayless , Hanzhang Xu medRxiv 2025.09.05.25335178; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.05.25335178 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Digital Divide or Educational Divide? The Impact of Social Media on COVID-19 Vaccination in Middle-Aged and Older Adults Mason Dupre , Truls Østbye , Teah M. Bayless , Hanzhang Xu medRxiv 2025.09.05.25335178; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.05.25335178 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Geriatric Medicine Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (568) Allergy and Immunology (863) Anesthesia (300) Cardiovascular Medicine (4435) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (444) Dermatology (382) Emergency Medicine (608) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1509) Epidemiology (15228) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1124) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6599) Geriatric Medicine (668) Health Economics (997) Health Informatics (4536) Health Policy (1368) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1613) Hematology (540) HIV/AIDS (1264) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15916) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1103) Medical Education (623) Medical Ethics (146) Nephrology (667) Neurology (6599) Nursing (346) Nutrition (998) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1144) Occupational and Environmental Health (957) Oncology (3332) Ophthalmology (974) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (420) Pain Medicine (436) Palliative Medicine (130) Pathology (663) Pediatrics (1693) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (691) Primary Care Research (711) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5447) Public and Global Health (9231) Radiology and Imaging (2198) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1370) Respiratory Medicine (1196) Rheumatology (593) Sexual and Reproductive Health (712) Sports Medicine (530) Surgery (712) Toxicology (99) Transplantation (289) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a006eaa8cab606db',t:'MTc3OTU2OTI1NQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00