A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY ON THE ROLE OF DIAGNOSTIC LAPAROSCOPY IN IDENTIFYING TUBAL AND PERITONEAL FACTORS IN FEMALE INFERTILITY.
dissertation
OA: gold
CC0
AI-generated deep summary
This cross-sectional study evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of laparoscopy in identifying tubal and peritoneal causes of infertility among 50 women who had previously undergone hysterosalpingography. The researchers found that laparoscopy detected tubal blockages in 32% of cases and peritoneal factors, including adhesions and endometriosis, in 24% of cases, demonstrating higher sensitivity than non-invasive imaging methods. The authors concluded that direct visualization via laparoscopy is essential for accurate diagnosis and tailored treatment planning, particularly when initial imaging results are inconclusive. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Background: Infertility affects a significant percentage of couples worldwide, with tubal and peritoneal factors being major contributors. While hysterosalpingography (HSG) is commonly used for assessing tubal patency, its limitations in accuracy make diagnostic laparoscopy a preferred choice. Laparoscopy allows direct visualization of the pelvic organs, providing a more accurate diagnosis of tubal blockages and peritoneal pathologies, such as adhesions and endometriosis, which are often undetectable through non-invasive techniques. This study evaluates the effectiveness of diagnostic laparoscopy in identifying tubal and peritoneal factors in female infertility, focusing on its role as a gold standard for infertility diagnosis. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 50 women with primary or secondary infertility. Each participant underwent diagnostic laparoscopy following clinical evaluation and HSG. Data were collected on the presence of tubal blockages, peritoneal adhesions, and endometriosis, and results were analyzed to compare findings between primary and secondary infertility groups. Results: Tubal factors, including bilateral tubal blockage, were identified in 32% of cases, with a similar incidence in both primary and secondary infertility. Peritoneal factors, such as pelvic adhesions and endometriosis, were present in 24% of cases, predominantly in primary infertility. Diagnostic laparoscopy revealed a higher sensitivity for detecting these factors compared to HSG, emphasizing its role in cases where non-invasive imaging was inconclusive. Conclusion: Diagnostic laparoscopy is a valuable tool for identifying tubal and peritoneal factors in female infertility, offering high diagnostic accuracy and aiding in tailored treatment planning. Its ability to directly visualize pelvic abnormalities makes it essential in the comprehensive evaluation of infertility. Recommendations: Laparoscopy should be considered in routine infertility workups, especially for patients with unexplained infertility or inconclusive HSG results. Further research on combining laparoscopy with minimally invasive treatments may improve fertility outcomes.
Full text
6,085 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Background
Infertility affects a significant percentage of couples worldwide, with tubal and peritoneal factors being major contributors. While hysterosalpingography (HSG) is commonly used for assessing tubal patency, its limitations in accuracy make diagnostic laparoscopy a preferred choice. Laparoscopy allows direct visualization of the pelvic organs, providing a more accurate diagnosis of tubal blockages and peritoneal pathologies, such as adhesions and endometriosis, which are often undetectable through non-invasive techniques. The study aims to evaluate the role of diagnostic laparoscopy in identifying tubal and peritoneal causes of infertility in female patients.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted on 50 women with primary or secondary infertility. Each participant underwent diagnostic laparoscopy following clinical evaluation and HSG. Data were collected on tubal blockages, peritoneal adhesions, and endometriosis, and results were analyzed to compare findings between primary and secondary infertility groups.
Results
Tubal factors, including bilateral tubal blockage, were identified in 32% of cases, with a similar incidence in both primary and secondary infertility. Peritoneal factors, such as pelvic adhesions and endometriosis, were present in 24% of cases, predominantly in primary infertility. Diagnostic laparoscopy revealed a higher sensitivity for detecting these factors than HSG, emphasizing its role in cases where non-invasive imaging was inconclusive.
Conclusion
Diagnostic laparoscopy is a valuable tool for identifying tubal and peritoneal factors in female infertility, offering high diagnostic accuracy and aiding in tailored treatment planning. Its ability to directly visualize pelvic abnormalities makes it essential in the comprehensive evaluation of infertility.
Recommendations
Laparoscopy should be considered in routine infertility workups, especially for patients with unexplained infertility or inconclusive HSG results. Further research on combining laparoscopy with minimally invasive treatments may improve fertility outcomes.
References
Argentino GL, Bueloni-Dias FN, Leite NJ, Peres GF, Elias LV, Bortolani VC, Padovani CR, Spadoto-Dias D, Dias R. The role of laparoscopy in the propaedeutics of gynecological diagnosis. Acta cirurgica brasileira. 2019;34(01): e20190010000010.https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020190010000010PMid:30785511
PMCid: PMC6585922
Dutta S, Mazumder P, Mishra D, Saha JK. Study on Comparative Diagnostic Efficacy of HSG & Laparoscopy in Infertility. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2020 Mar 23;9(12):937-43. https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2020/202
Varlas V, Rhazi Y, Cloțea E, Borș RG, Mirică RM, Bacalbașa N. Hysterolaparoscopy: a gold standard for diagnosing and treating infertility and benign uterine pathology. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021 Aug 23;10(16):3749. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163749 PMid:34442042 PMCid:PMC8396885
Jahan S. Role of laparoscopy in infertility. BIRDEM Medical Journal. 2012 Oct 22;2(2):99-103.
https://doi.org/10.3329/birdem.v2i2.12324
Maiti GD, Lele P. Hysterosalpingography (HSG), hysteroscopy and laparoscopic evaluation of female genital tract of patient attending tertiary infertility center and correlation of various modalities. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018 Apr 1;7(4):1597. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20181362
Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Sui M, Guan X, Sun J. Diagnosing and Treating Infertility via Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery versus Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery: A Retrospective Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023 Feb 16;12(4):1576. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041576 PMid:36836109 PMCid:PMC9966021
Annan JJ, Asubonteng GO, Konney TO. Experience with diagnostic laparoscopy in the evaluation of tubal factor infertility. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020 May 13;10(05):688. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2020.1050062
Shetty SK, Shetty H, Rai S. Laparoscopic evaluation of tubal factor in cases of infertility. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep 1;2(3):410-3. https://doi.org/10.5455/2320-1770.ijrcog20130930
Choudhary R, Sinha R. EVALUATION OF HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY VERSUS LAPAROSCOPY IN THE DETERMINATION OF TUBAL FACTORS IN FEMALE INFERTILITY: A HOSPITAL BASED COMPARATIVE STUDY. International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies. 2020;4. https://doi.org/10.32553/ijmbs.v4i9.1421
Tan J, Deng M, Xia M, Lai M, Pan W, Li Y. Comparison of hysterosalpingography with laparoscopy in the diagnosis of a tubal factor of female infertility. Frontiers in medicine. 2021 Oct 29; 8:720401. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.720401 PMid:34778286 PMCid: PMC8585930
Khan YL, Imran S, Samreen Z. Identification of Factors Contributing to Primary Female Subfertility by Diagnostic Hystero-Laparoscopy: An Experience of Private Hospital. Journal of Shalamar Medical & Dental College-JSHMDC. 2022 Dec 30;3(2):76-80. https://doi.org/10.53685/jshmdc.v3i2.112
Khalid MA, Khurshid N, Yasin A, Afzal M, Aziz U, Hussain S. Laparoscopic Evaluation of Tubal Factors in Female Subfertility. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences. 2022;16(12):634-. https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs20221612634
Singh N, Pramanik KD, Bajaj M, Roy R. Diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy: An important tool in the evaluation of female infertility, in beneficiaries of ESI scheme in Eastern India. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2022 May 3;13(5):183-8. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v13i5.44227
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Beena Gupta, Prabhat Kumar Bhagat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Ask this paper
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK