Preservation of the endometrial enhancement after magnetic resonance imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of submucosal uterine fibroids

In: European Radiology · 2017 · vol. 27(9) , pp. 3956–3965 · doi:10.1007/s00330-017-4765-4 · PMID:28210800 · W2588835091
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 3 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-07

This study evaluated endometrial integrity after MR-HIFU ablation of submucosal uterine fibroids, finding most cases showed preserved or minimally impaired endometrium, with endometrial protrusion as a risk factor for more severe injury.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This retrospective single-center study evaluated endometrial integrity after MRI-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of 117 submucosal uterine fibroids in 101 women, using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI to grade endometrial impairment immediately, at 3 months, and (in a smaller subset) at 12 months. Endometrial enhancement was preserved intact or minimally impaired in most cases, with initial grades 0–3 observed in 56.4%, 24.8%, 13.7%, and 4.3% of fibroids, respectively, and among 37 followed cases most showed improvement at later imaging. Generalized estimating equation analysis found that the degree of endometrial protrusion was significantly associated with the severity of endometrial injury, though only limited follow-up imaging was available. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 9,494 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the integrity of endometrial enhancement after magnetic resonance imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) ablation of submucosal uterine fibroids based on contrast-enhanced MRI findings, and to identify the risk factors for endometrial impairment.

Methods

In total, 117 submucosal fibroids (diameter: 5.9 ± 3.0 cm) in 101 women (age: 43.6 ± 4.4 years) treated with MR-HIFU ablation were retrospectively analysed. Endometrial integrity was assessed with contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images at immediate (n = 101), 3-month (n = 62) and 12-month (n = 15) follow-ups. Endometrial impairment was classified into grades 0 (continuous endometrium), 1 (pin-point, full-thickness discontinuity), 2 (between grade 1 and 3), or 3 (full-thickness discontinuity >1 cm). Risk factors were assessed with generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis.

Results

Among 117 fibroids, grades 0, 1, 2 and 3 endometrial impairments were observed at initial examination in 56.4%, 24.8%, 13.7% and 4.3%, respectively. Among 37 fibroid cases of endometrial impairment for which follow-ups were conducted, 30 showed improvements at 3- and/or 12-month follow-up. GEE analysis revealed the degree of endometrial protrusion was significantly associated with severity of endometrial injury (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

After MR-HIFU ablation of submucosal fibroids, endometrial enhancement was preserved intact or minimally impaired in most cases. Impaired endometrium, which is more common after treating endometrially-protruded fibroids, may recover spontaneously. Key Points • After MR-HIFU ablation for submucosal fibroid, endometrium is mostly preserved/minimally impaired. • Endometrial-protruded submucosal fibroid is susceptible to more severe endometrial impairment. • The impaired endometrium may recover spontaneously at follow-up MR exams. Similar content being viewed by others Abbreviations - FDA: - Food and Drug Administration - FSH: - Follicle-stimulating hormone - GEE: - Generalized estimating equation - GnRHa: - Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist - MR-HIFU: - Magnetic resonance imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound - NPV: - Non-perfused volume - US-HIFU: - Ultrasonography-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound

References

Al Hilli MM, Stewart EA (2010) Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery. Semin Reprod Med 28:242–249 Park MJ, Kim YS, Rhim H, Lim HK (2014) Safety and therapeutic efficacy of complete or near-complete ablation of symptomatic uterine fibroid tumors by MR imaging-guided high-intensity focused US therapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 25:231–239 Tempany CM, Stewart EA, McDannold N, Quade BJ, Jolesz FA, Hynynen K (2003) MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of uterine leiomyomas: a feasibility study. Radiology 226:897–905 Ciolina F, Manganaro L, Scipione R, Napoli A (2016) Alternatives to surgery for the treatment of myomas. Minerva Ginecol 68:364–379 Mindjuk I, Trumm CG, Herzog P, Stahl R, Matzko M (2015) MRI predictors of clinical success in MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) treatments of uterine fibroids: results from a single centre. Eur Radiol 25:1317–1328 Rabinovici J, David M, Fukunishi H et al (2010) Pregnancy outcome after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) for conservative treatment of uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril 93:199–209 Kim YS (2015) Advances in MR image-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy. Int J Hyperth 31:225–232 Lenard ZM, McDannold NJ, Fennessy FM et al (2008) Uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery--imaging predictors of success. Radiology 249:187–194 Funaki K, Fukunishi H, Funaki T, Sawada K, Kaji Y, Maruo T (2007) Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine fibroids: relationship between the therapeutic effects and signal intensity of preexisting T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196:184.e1–184.e6 Munro MG, Critchley HO, Fraser IS (2012) The FIGO systems for nomenclature and classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: who needs them? Am J Obstet Gynecol 207:259–265 Kim YS, Park MJ, Keserci B et al (2014) Uterine fibroids: postsonication temperature decay rate enables prediction of therapeutic responses to MR imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation. Radiology 270:589–600 Kim YS, Keserci B, Partanen A et al (2012) Volumetric MR-HIFU ablation of uterine fibroids: role of treatment cell size in the improvement of energy efficiency. Eur J Radiol 81:3652–3659 Letterie GS, Haggerty MF (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of intrauterine synechiae. Gynecol Obstet Investig 37:66–68 Montoliu-Fornas G, Marti-Bonmati L (2016) Magnetic resonance imaging structured reporting in infertility. Fertil Steril Kim YS, Kim BG, Rhim H et al (2014) Uterine fibroids: semiquantitative perfusion MR imaging parameters associated with the intraprocedural and immediate postprocedural treatment efficiencies of MR imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation. Radiology 273:462–471 Voogt MJ, Trillaud H, Kim YS et al (2012) Volumetric feedback ablation of uterine fibroids using magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound therapy. Eur Radiol 22:411–417 Ishihara Y, Calderon A, Watanabe H, Okamoto K, Suzuki Y, Kuroda K (1995) A precise and fast temperature mapping using water proton chemical shift. Magn Reson Med 34:814–823 Köhler MO, Mougenot C, Quesson B et al (2009) Volumetric HIFU ablation under 3D guidance of rapid MRI thermometry. Med Phys 36:3521–3535 Meshorer A, Prionas SD, Fajardo LF, Meyer JL, Hahn GM, Martinez AA (1983) The effects of hyperthermia on normal mesenchymal tissues. Application of a histologic grading system. Arch Pathol Lab Med 107:328–334 Ahmed M, Solbiati L, Brace CL et al (2014) Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria--a 10-year update. J Vasc Interv Radiol 25:1691–1705.e4 Qin J, Chen JY, Zhao WP, Hu L, Chen WZ, Wang ZB (2012) Outcome of unintended pregnancy after ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroids. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 117:273–277 Clark NA, Mumford SL, Segars JH (2014) Reproductive impact of MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery for fibroids: a systematic review of the evidence. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 26:151–161 Press releases, FDA approves InSightec's next generation Exablate fibroid treatment system. InSightec, Ltd. http://www.insightec.com/news-events/press-releases/fda-approves-insightec-s-next-generation-exablate-fibroid-treatment-system/. Updated October 7, 2015. Accessed 9 May 2015 Mara M, Kubinova K (2014) Embolization of uterine fibroids from the point of view of the gynecologist: pros and cons. Int J Womens Health 6:623–629 Mohan PP, Hamblin MH, Vogelzang RL (2013) Uterine artery embolization and its effect on fertility. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24:925–930 Kim YS, Trillaud H, Rhim H et al (2012) MR thermometry analysis of sonication accuracy and safety margin of volumetric MR imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Radiology 265:627–637 Gorny KR, Hangiandreou NJ, Hesley GK, Gostout BS, McGee KP, Felmlee JP (2006) MR guided focused ultrasound: technical acceptance measures for a clinical system. Phys Med Biol 51:3155–3173 McDannold N, Hynynen K (2006) Quality assurance and system stability of a clinical MRI-guided focused ultrasound system: four-year experience. Med Phys 33:4307–4313 Funaki K, Fukunishi H, Funaki T, Kawakami C (2007) Mid-term outcome of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine myomas: from six to twelve months after volume reduction. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14:616–621 Zhao WP, Chen JY, Chen WZ (2015) Effect of biological characteristics of different types of uterine fibroids, as assessed with T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, on ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation. Ultrasound Med Biol 41:423–431 Hoad CL, Fulford J, Raine-Fenning NJ, Campbell BK, Johnson IR, Gowland PA (2006) In vivo perfusion, T1, and T2 measurements in the female pelvis during the normal menstrual cycle: a feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:1350–1356 Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Ethics declarations Guarantor The scientific guarantor of this publication is Dr. Young-sun Kim. Conflict of interest The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. Funding The authors state that this work has not received any funding. Statistics and biometry Two of the authors have significant statistical expertise. Ethical approval Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Informed consent Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board. Study subjects or cohorts overlap No study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported. Methodology Retrospective, observational, performed at one institution. Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Kim, Ys., Kim, TJ., Lim, H.K. et al. Preservation of the endometrial enhancement after magnetic resonance imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of submucosal uterine fibroids. Eur Radiol 27, 3956–3965 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4765-4 Received: Revised: Accepted: Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4765-4

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (3)

Cited by (3)

References (31)

Cited by (3)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK