Effects of different subcutaneous sites on heterotopic autotransplantation of canine ovarian tissue

Effects of different subcutaneous sites on heterotopic autotransplantation of canine ovarian tissue | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Effects of different subcutaneous sites on heterotopic autotransplantation of canine ovarian tissue Fabiana AS Brandão, Danielle CC Brito, Leda MC Pereira, Kele A Alves, and 7 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2564726/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 18 May, 2023 Read the published version in Veterinary Research Communications → Version 1 posted 7 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Ovarian tissue transplantation makes it possible to restore fertility; however, the success of this technique depends on the transplant region used. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of two subcutaneous regions on canine ovarian transplantation, pinna (Pi) and neck (Ne), for 7 and 15 days. Ovaries collected by ovariosalpingohysterectomy were fragmented using a punch device. Fresh fragments were fixed, and the others were immediately grafted onto the animal itself in the Pi and Ne regions for 7 and 15 days. Recovered fragments were evaluated for histology (morphology, development and stromal density), picrosirius (collagen fibers), and immunohistochemistry (fibrosis and cell proliferation). The results showed that follicular normality rates were lower in Pi-7 (78%) vs. control (90%) and Pi-15 (86%), similar in Ne-7 (92%) and superior in Ne-15 (97%) compared to the control, with the effect of the region Ne (94%) superior (P < 0.05) to Pi (82%). Stromal density reduced in both regions vs . control but was similar within 15 days. Fragments from both regions showed higher fibronectin labeling and deposition of type I and lower type III collagen fibers (P < 0.05) vs . control. Proliferation rates in Ne-7 were higher (P < 0.05) than in control, and Pi-15 was higher (P < 0.05) than Ne-15. In conclusion, the pinna can be a potential region for canine ovarian tissue autotransplantation than the neck region in 15 days. Preantral follicles Collagen fibers Pinna Neck Autograft Dog Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Introduction The wild canid population has been constantly affected due to anthropic actions, like deforestation, which can lead to invasion of urban environments, roadkill, and, consequently, the death of these individuals (Orozco et al. 2014 ). Thus, some canid species have been classified as vulnerable or "near threatened" (IUCN 2021 ). Therefore, different reproductive strategies are being developed to preserve the fertility of both wild species that are at risk of extinction, as well as domestic animals of high genetic value, commercial or sentimental, using animal models (Abe et al. 2011 ; Johnson et al. 2014 ; Paz 2015 ; Lee et al. 2018 ), that can even configure applications for human reproduction (Scalercio et al. 2015 ; Donfack et al. 2018 ; Costa et al. 2020 ; Souza et al. 2020 ). Transplantation of ovarian tissue, associated with cryopreservation, has become an increasingly important tool in studies focused on folliculogenesis and reproductive biology (Terazono et al. 2012a ; Campos-Junior et al. 2016 ), enabling fertility restoration (Bordes et al. 2005 ; Donnez et al. 2014; Tammiste et al. 2019 ; Hockman et al. 2020). Among the types of transplants, autotransplantation has been showing highlights for not requiring immunosuppressive therapy, immune regulators, or knockout mice and for presenting less possibility of rejection (Costa et al. 2020 ). In addition, allotransplantation or xenotransplantation requires expensive techniques and specialized and equipped laboratories. Thus, autotransplantation can be considered an alternative for preserving the fertility of canid species, especially for those who have undergone oncological treatment, as in the case of transmissible venereal tumor (TVT) common in domestic dogs (Ganguly et al. 2016 ). Heterotopic implantation sites have been considered in autotransplants (Lee et al. 2004 ). The subcutaneous site has proven to be a suitable environment because it is easy to monitor and access, is low invasive (Souza et al. 2020 ), and does not require general anesthesia (Donfack et al. 2017 ), in addition to facilitating graft recovery. These sites are considered preferred sites for collecting oocytes to be used in in vitro fertilization (Costa et al. 2020 ). In subcutaneous sites, the neck region has been used to obtain favorable follicular survival rates and functional resumption of ovarian tissue after autotransplantation (Leonel et al. 2004; Vilela et al. 2019 ; Costa et al. 2020 ; Souza et al. 2019; Souza et al. 2020 ; Souza et al. 2020 ). However, despite the good results obtained, the type of region used can also hinder the success of subcutaneous autotransplantation due to hypoxia or ischemia/reperfusion injury, to which the tissue can be subjected (Donfack et al. 2017 ). This way, other subcutaneous regions must be considered. Recently, Terren et al. ( 2022 ) performed autotransplantation of cryopreserved whole ovaries from mice, between the outer layer of skin and the cartilage of the ear, with recovery up to 21 days and obtained an increase in vascularization and cell proliferation in the ovary. These results led the authors to conclude that the ear transplant model may be suitable for ovarian tissue transplantation and helpful in testing pharmaceutical strategies. Regarding the quality of ovarian tissue after autotransplantation, preantral follicles morphology and stromal density have been frequently used (Pinto et al. 2020 ; Souza et al. 2020 ). Furthermore, the expression of proliferation markers, such as PCNA (proliferating-cell nuclear antigen), has played an essential role in the functionality of ovarian tissue after transplantation (Hariya et al. 2016). Excessive deposition of extracellular matrix components can also determine the quality of the graft and is considered indicative of tissue fibrosis, one of the main obstacles in transplant systems (Scalercio et al. 2015 ; Souza et al. 2020 ). Among the factors involved in fibrosis formation, the synthesis of extracellular matrix proteins can be highlighted, like collagen type I, type III, and fibronectin (Barnes and Gorin, 2011 ), which are responsible for remodeling the tissue matrix, mainly after cell loss (Scalercio et al. 2015 ; Zhou et al. 2017 ; Souza et al. 2020 ). Based on that, the present study aimed to evaluate, for the first time in female dogs, the effect of the pinna and neck regions in the subcutaneous site on autotransplantation of ovarian tissue for 7 and 15 days, about the normality of preantral follicles, development and stromal density, as well as tissue proliferation and fibrosis, using the domestic dog as an experimental model. Materials And Methods Ethical aspects This study was approved and carried out under the Ethics in Animal Use Committee guidelines of the State University of Ceará (3349245/2018). Chemicals Unless otherwise indicated, the chemical reagents used in this study are from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Origin of animals and collection of ovarian tissue Eight adult female dogs (3–6 years old), mixed breed, in distinct phases estrous phases (two females in anestrus and the others in diestrus), belonging to the Zoonosis Surveillance Unit (UVZ - Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil), were submitted to ovariosalpingohysterectomy (OSH) at Veterinary Hospital Prof. Sylvio Barbosa Cardoso of the State University of Ceará (HVSBC-UECE). After OSH, the ovarian bursa was removed, and the ovaries were washed once in 70% alcohol and twice in the Minimum Essential Medium (MEM-HEPES) supplemented with 100 µg/mL of penicillin and 100 µg/mL of streptomycin. Then, the ovaries were sectioned with the auxiliary of a 2 mm punch device (Punch Keyes for 2mm Skin Biopsy - ABC Surgical Instruments, São Paulo, Brazil) to obtain fragments of sizes 2 x 2 mm, according to the modified protocol by Wiedemann et al. ( 2012 ). Experimental design Fifteen fragments (n = 15) were recovered by each pair of ovaries from eight females and randomly distributed in different experimental conditions (Fig. 1 ). Three fragments (n = 3) were fixed immediately and classified as fresh control (FC). Then, the remaining fragments (n = 12) were autotransplanted subcutaneously in the following regions (Fig. 1 A and B): external side of the pinna for 7 days (Pi-7; n = 3) and 15 days (Pi-15; n = 3); lateral neck for 7 days (Ne-7; n = 3) and 15 days (Ne-15; n = 3). This procedure was repeated eight times, with a total of 120 fragments. After the transplantation time had elapsed, all fragments were submitted to histological, histochemical (picrosirius), and immunohistochemistry evaluation. Autotransplantation and recovery of fragments Autotransplantation was performed according to an adaptation of the anesthetic and surgical protocol described by Terazono et al. ( 2012a ). Briefly, the bitches were induced with intramuscular anesthesia of 0.3 mg/kg of methadone hydrochloride (10 mg/mL; Mytedom, São Paulo, Brazil) and intravenous midazolam hydrochloride of 0.5 mg/kg (5 mg; Dormire, São Paulo, Brazil) associated with 2.0 mg/kg of ketamine hydrochloride (10%; Ketamine; São Paulo, Brazil), and 4 mg/kg of propofol (10 mg/mL; Propovan, São Paulo, Brazil). Furthermore, inhalation of 3% isoflurane (Isoflurane, São Paulo, Brazil) and oxygen maintained anesthesia. Thus, after performing OSH, ovarian fragments were obtained from the ovarian cortex using the punch device. Then, for autotransplantation, a subcutaneous cut was made in the dorsal region of the neck or on the convex side of the pinna; the fragments were fixed using surgical 6 − 0 nylon. Next, the suture of the subcutaneous cut was performed with 3 − 0 nylon thread. After seven days of transplant, three grafts were recovered from each region (pinna and neck). The animals received 0.3 mg/kg of methadone hydrochloride intramuscularly and intravenously, combining 0.5 mg/kg of midazolam hydrochloride and 5.0 mg/kg of ketamine hydrochloride. Furthermore, local anesthesia was applied using 2 mL of lidocaine hydrochloride (2%; Xylestesin, São Paulo, Brazil). Posteriorly, at the end of the 15 days, the same animals were euthanized to remove the other grafts in the respective regions. Thus, 0.3 mg/kg of methadone hydrochloride was administered intramuscularly and 25 mg/mL of thiopental intravenous (50 mg/mL; Thiopentax, São Paulo, Brazil) until the loss of consciousness. Then, 1 mL/kg of potassium chloride was applied intravenously (10%; Potassium chloride, São Paulo, Brazil) following the standard protocol of the HVSBC-UECE. Macroscopy of the grafts The recovery rate was determined, and the macroscopic appearance of the recovered fragments was qualitatively described using a scoring system (see Table 1 ), following the criteria: (I) morphology , considering if the graft is necrotic, intact (similar to the original fragment) or swollen; (II) adhesion when the graft is only secured by the suture (absent tissue adhesion) or adhered to host tissue; (III) extent of bleeding at the time of graft removal. The data were presented as median. Furthermore, the presence or absence of suture in the graft was observed. A single individual performed all evaluations. Table 1 Macroscopic criteria of canine ovarian tissue after transplantation Score Morphology Adhesion Bleeding 1 Necrotic Absent Absent 2 Moderately necrotic Weak Weak 3 Intact Moderate Moderate 4 Moderately swollen Strong Strong 5 Swollen Very strong Very strong Histological analysis Fresh and autotransplanted ovarian fragments were fixed in Davidson's solution (Formalin 22.2%, alcohol 33.4%, glacial acetic acid 11%, and tap water) for 12 hours at room temperature (Brito et al. 2021 ). Posteriorly, they were dehydrated, clarified, included in paraffin, and sectioned at 5 µm. A total of 7736 sections were obtained (~ 1547 per treatment) and stained with periodic acid-Schiff - hematoxylin. The preantral follicles were analyzed under an optical microscope (Nikon E200; Tokyo, Japan) with 400х magnification and classified as morphologically normal when they contained oocytes, cytoplasm, and intact granulosa cells; or degenerated when they presented cytoplasmic retraction, presence of a pyknotic nucleus, and disorganization of granulosa cells (Silva et al. 2002 ). Morphology evaluations were performed only in follicles with a visible nucleus. Furthermore, the preantral follicles were classified as primordial (oocyte surrounded by one layer of flattened granulosa cells) and based on the stage of development as follows: transitional (one layer of flattened and cuboidal granulosa cells), primary (one layer of cuboidal granulosa cells around the oocyte), and secondary (oocyte surrounded by two or more layers of cuboidal granulosa cells) follicles (Souza et al. 2020 ). Density of stromal cells For cell density of ovarian stroma, 10% of the histological sections of each ovary fragment were analyzed, recording the average of cells from four random quadrants (50 × 50 µm = 2,500 µm 2 ), as described by Alves et al. ( 2016 ). A single operator performed all evaluations. Picrosirius According to Scalercio et al. ( 2015 ), the density of collagen-rich deposits was analyzed. The sections of the ovarian fragments of all experimental conditions were processed according to classic histology and stained using the standard picrosirius red staining protocol (0.1%) (# 365548-5G) with a saturated picric acid solution (1.2%), for 1 hour, at room temperature. For the evaluation, four sections were photographed under polarization microscopy (Nikon E200; Tokyo, Japan) at 400× magnification, coupled with an image capture system (Nikon, Coolpix 4500). Collagen fibers were determined using the different polarizing colors of collagen I and III types, yellowish-orange and green birefringence, respectively (Junqueira et al. 1978 ). Image analysis was performed by measuring the red threshold, green and blue to obtain the percentages of the red and green colors, expressed in pixels (ImageJ software, version 1.45; National Institutes of Health, USA) (Pinto et al. 2020 ). Immunohistochemistry Ovarian fragments from all experimental conditions were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PAF) at room temperature for 2 hours, dehydrated, clarified, included in paraffin, and sectioned at 5 µm. The sections were mounted on positively charged slides and processed for immunohistochemistry for PCNA and fibronectin proteins. For antigenic recovery, the slides were incubated in a recovery buffer at 98°C for 20 minutes (protein specific pH; Dako, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The blocking of endogenous peroxidase activity was performed using 10% hydrogen peroxide in methanol. Then, incubation was performed with rabbit polyclonal to PCNA (1:1000; AB2426, Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, 461 USA) or rabbit polyclonal to fibronectin (1:50; AB2413, Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, 461 USA) primary antibody for 30 minutes. Posteriorly, the slides were incubated for 30 minutes with the biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1:200; AB9049, Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, 461 USA). Finally, the slides were incubated for 30 minutes with the avidin-biotin enzyme complex (ABC; Vector laboratories, 465 Burlingame, CA, USA) to react with chromogen 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB, ACB030; ScyTek Laboratories Inc., West Logan, USA) for 5 minutes. Hematoxylin and 0.5% ammonia solution were used as counterstain. The negative control was performed by omitting the primary antibody. For positive control, they used mouse spleen tissue for PCNA and fibronectin. The evaluation of the PCNA was performed on the stromal cells; in an area of 400 µm 2 , the proliferation of stromal cells and the percentage of stromal cells positive for PCNA were determined (Hariya et al. 2016). However, the evaluation of tissue fibrosis was determined using the modified H-score method, described by Wiweko et al. ( 2019 ), \(H-score = \% marked area \left(400 {\mu m}^{2}\right) x (color intensity + 1)\) . The color intensity was obtained by the intensity scale (weak = 1, medium = 2, strong = 3). Statistical Analysis The statistical analyzes were performed using Sigma Plot (version 11.0 Systat Software Inc., USA). When appropriate, normality (Shapiro-Wilk) and homogeneity of variance tests (Levene's) were performed. One-way ANOVA, followed by post-hoc test, was used to verify differences between the fresh control and the other treatments. Two-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the main effects (factors) of the transplant region (Pi vs. Ne) and days post-transplant (7 vs. 15). All data were presented as the mean and standard error of the mean (± SEM), and differences were considered significant when P < 0.05. Results Recovery rate and macroscopic aspects of the graft Recovery rates in Pi-7 regions, Ne-7 and Ne-15, were 100% (24/24); only the Pi-15 region obtained 95,8% (23/24). The median of the scores referring to the macroscopic criteria of the recovered grafts are shown (Table 2 ). Most grafts recovered showed intact morphology, similar to the original fragment, except the Pi-15 region, which presented three grafts (3/23) moderately swollen and whitish. The fragments with a longer transplant time (15 days) visibly showed greater adherence regarding adherence to host tissue. Most fragments did not show bleeding, except for the 15-day grafts from the Ne region, which had few bleeding points. Regarding the presence of sutures, all grafts kept their original suture. Table 2 Median of the scores referring to the macroscopic criteria of the grafts recovered from the pinna (Pi) and neck (Ne) regions of canine ovarian autotransplantation after 7 and 15 days Macroscopic criteria and points Treatment Morphology Adhesion Bleeding Pi-7 3 1.5 1 Pi-15 3 4 1 Ne-7 3 3 1 Ne-15 3 4 1.5 Morphology and development of preantral follicles A total of 3502 preantral follicles were analyzed in the present study. Figure 2 A shows the percentage of morphologically normal preantral follicles. Representative images are shown (Fig. 2 B-F). As observed, despite the percentage of morphologically normal follicles having decreased in Pi-7 (78.5 ± 5.6; P < 0.05), when compared to FC (90.8 ± 0.8), the Pi-15 (86.6 ± 7.6) and Ne-7 (92.8 ± 1.3) regions did not show significant difference with FC. However, curiously, after 15 days of autotransplantation, the Ne region showed an increase (97.0 ± 1.2; P 0.05) between days in both regions. However, Ne-7 had a percentage of normal follicles significantly higher than Pi-7. In contrast, this percentage was similar between Pi-15 and Ne-15 (P > 0.05). The effect of the region (Pi vs. Ne) and day (7 vs. 15) on the percentage of morphologically normal follicles is shown in Figs. 2a 1 and 2a 2 , respectively. One can observe that the Ne region (94.9 ± 1.1) was significantly superior to the Pi (82.6 ± 3.2). However, the day effect did not change (P > 0.05) the normality rate of preantral follicles in transplanted tissues in different regions. In addition, our data also showed that the percentages of developing preantral follicles (transitional, primary and secondary) were significantly lower in both regions after 7 and 15 days of autotransplantation compared to the control. Stromal cell density Figure 3 A shows the density of stromal cells in each treatment, and their representative images are shown in Fig. 3 B-F. Stromal density was significantly reduced in all transplants when compared to FC. In addition, between treatments, it was observed that autotransplantation for 15 days also caused a significant reduction in stromal cell density in both regions; however, although Pi-7 had a higher stromal density (P 0.05) after 15 days of autotransplantation. When the effect of the region (Pi vs. Ne) and day (7 vs. 15) of the autotransplant was analyzed on density (Fig. 3a 1 and 3a 2 ), one can be observed that region Pi and day 7 had a higher density of stromal cells. Quantification of collagen fibers type I and III Picrosirius staining revealed that all autotransplants had high levels of type I collagen fibers (Fig. 4 A; P < 0.05) and a reduction in type III collagen (Fig. 4 B; P 0.05). In contrast, Ne-15 promoted a higher deposit of the fiber type I than Ne-7 (P < 0.05). Unlike that, the type III collagen level showed a significant reduction after 15 days of autotransplantation in both regions. No difference in collagen I and III levels was observed when the Pi and Ne regions were compared on the same day. Representative images of picrosirius coloration in the respective treatments are shown in Fig. 4 (C-Q). Additionally, no statistical difference was observed between regions (Pi vs . Ne) on type I (Fig. 4a 1 ) and III (Fig. 4b 1 ) collagen deposition. However, regarding the day effect (7 vs . 15), day 7 had the lowest level of collagen type I (Fig. 4a 2 ; P < 0.05) and the highest level of collagen III (Fig. 4b 2 ; P < 0.05) compared to 15 days. Profile of the immunostaining PCNA (stromal cell proliferation) According to Fig. 5 A, no significant difference with FC was observed in the Pi region on both days of autotransplantation (7 and 15). However, although the Ne region showed an increased cell proliferation within seven days (P < 0.05), there was a significant reduction after 15 days of autotransplantation compared to FC. This reduction after 15 days was observed in both regions (P < 0.05) when days 7 and 15 were compared among themselves, although being more pronounced in Ne. In contrast, when different regions were compared, it can be observed that although Pi-7 had lower cell proliferation than Ne-7 (P < 0.05), Pi-15 has shown to be significantly superior to Ne-15. Representative images are shown in Fig. 5 (C-H). No significant differences were observed when the region effect (Pi vs. Ne) was analyzed (Fig. 5a 1 ). Although, regarding the day effect, day 7 showed a significantly greater proliferation than day 15 of autotransplantation (Fig. 5a 2 ). Fibronectin Figure 5 B shows that fibronectin labeling was significantly higher in all autotransplant treatments compared with FC. Conversely, between treatments, it has been observed that the Pi region did not show any difference between days (P > 0.05), unlike the Ne region, which showed the highest percentage of labeling in Ne-15 (P < 0.05). However, the comparison between different regions showed that Pi-7 was significantly higher than Ne-7. Nevertheless, after 15 days of autotransplantation, the Pi region had a lower level of fibronectin labeling than the Ne region (P < 0.05). Representative images are shown in Fig. 5 I-N. The effect of the region (Pi vs . Ne) and day (7 vs. 15) are shown in Figs. 5b 1 and 5b 2 , respectively. No significant differences were observed between regions under fibronectin labeling. However, concerning the day effect, it has been observed that day 15 had a significantly higher labeling level than day 7 of autotransplantation. Discussion Ovarian tissue transplantation may be a promising technique for resuming the reproductive potential of domestic species with high genetic value or endangered wild species (Terazono et al. 2012a ; Leonel et al. 2018 ). Still, among the types of transplants, autotransplantation has stood out for preventing graft rejection and not requiring immunosuppressive therapy (Costa et al. 2020 ). However, the graft region has been considered essential in maintaining and functional resumption of ovarian tissue in transplantation (Cao and Li, 2019). Thus, using the domestic dog as a model, the present study investigated for the first time the effect of the pinna and neck region on heterotopic autotransplantation of ovarian tissue for 7 and 15 days. Our macroscopic findings showed that most of the recovered grafts were morphologically intact. Furthermore, during the 15 days of transplantation, grafts showed greater adherence in both regions studied (pinna and neck). However, the Ne-15 stood out for having presented bleeding on withdrawal. Pinto et al. ( 2020 ) also observed good adhesion and bleeding upon graft removal, in the subcutaneous site in the neck region, in 15 days of goat ovarian tissue allotransplantation. The subcutaneous implantation site has been widely used for the grafting of ovarian tissue from different species (Oktay et al. 2011 ; Scalercio et al. 2015 ; Youm et al. 2015 ; Pinto et al. 2020 ; Souza et al. 2020 ) for being a place of easy access and monitoring with little invasiveness (Souza et al. 2020 ). However, this is the first study using a subcutaneous site in the pinna region in female dogs. The subcutaneous site in the neck region is known to be more anatomically irrigated than in the pinna region (Evans, 1971 ; Degner et al. 2004 ); this fact may justify the bleeding observed in the neck region after removal in 15 days of autotransplantation. The present study also showed that the neck region maintained rates of morphologically normal preantral follicles similar to and higher than the control in 7 and 15 days of autotransplantation, respectively. However, the pinna region showed a percentage similar to the neck region and the control in 15 days of autotransplantation. Studies have suggested that transplant sites with greater vascularization have better rates of morphologically normal follicles (Youm et al. 2015 ; Donfack et al. 2018 ; Pinto et al. 2020 ) by allowing better support of nutrients and essential factors for survival maintenance. This fact may explain our findings in the neck region, although the ear region needed more transplant days for better support and maintenance, despite being a region less vascularized than the neck. However, we believe that the higher percentage of normal follicles found in Ne-15, compared to control, may be due to follicular heterogeneity, i.e., variation in follicular density in the same fragment often found in different regions of the mammalian ovary cortex (Schmidt et al. 2003 ; Aerts et al. 2005 ; Fransolet et al. 2014 ; Alves et al. 2016 ; Wakasa et al. 2017 ; Brandão et al. 2018 ). Despite the results obtained in morphological normality, our data showed that autotransplantation in both regions did not show follicular development after days 7 and 15, in addition to presenting a reduction in preantral follicles in development (transitional, primary, and secondary). Significant reductions in follicular density are reported after autotransplantation of ovarian tissue in the subcutaneous region of the neck for seven days in mares (Souza et al., 2020 ) and the dorsal subcutaneous region for seven days in monkeys (Scalercio et al. 2015 ). In contrast, Khoram et al. ( 2011 ) demonstrated that 75–76% of follicles survived ischemia after isotransplantation of canine hemi-ovaries in the muscle layer region of the stomach wall for 60 days. Despite the promising results of this study, the methodology used in the use of hemi-ovaries differs from our study, because we use ovarian fragments of sizes 2 x 2 mm, which may respond differently to a transplant. Since developing follicles are more susceptible than quiescent preantral follicles (Webb et al. 2016 ). Furthermore, Li et al. ( 2010 ) showed that follicular death occurs soon after transplantation due to ischemia-reperfusion injury, as well as long periods of hypoxia (Damous et al. 2015 ) and oxidative stress (Cacciottola et al. 2018 ). These factors can cause follicular depletion during the first few days after transplantation and continue for about a week until the revascularization process is completed (Van Eyck et al. 2010 ; Soleimani et al. 2011 ), thus being considered the main obstacles to the technique's success. Likewise, stromal cell density was also affected by autotransplantation in both regions, mainly after seven days. These findings were similar to those observed in ovarian tissue transplants at intramuscular and subcutaneous sites (Pinto et al. 2020 ; Souza et al. 2020 ). However, curiously, the neck region showed a more significant reduction than the pinna region within seven days of transplantation. Kim et al. ( 2004 ) demonstrated that stromal cells are more vulnerable to ischemia than ovarian follicles. Thus, it is assumed that the damage to the graft in the first days of avascular transplantation and the vulnerability of stromal cells may have contributed to reducing these cells. Furthermore, the neck region, being more vascularized, can facilitate a series of cellular processes, such as the production of inflammatory cytokines, which can intensify tissue damage (Kalogeris et al. 2012 ; Slegtenhorst et al. 2014 ). Regarding matrix proteins, our data also showed that autotransplantation caused an increase in type I collagen and fibronectin, but a reduction in collagen type III in the two regions studied when compared with the control. Furthermore, an intriguing finding, high rates of type I collagen and fibronectin were observed in autotransplants only in the neck region (15 days). On the contrary, between 7 and 15 days of autotransplantation, type III collagen rates were reduced by almost half in both regions. Unlike our findings, Souza et al. ( 2020 ) observed that ovarian fragments from mares treated with VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) before autotransplantation subcutaneous obtained a reduction in type I collagen and an increase in type III collagen when compared to the non-transplanted control. The ovarian cortex comprises connective tissue cells and collagen fibers (Bochner et al. 2015 ). The events surrounding ovarian fibrosis are very complex, but they usually involve a proliferation of fibroblasts and excessive deposition of extracellular matrix, characterizing fibrosis (Zhou et al. 2017 ). Several factors are involved in the formation of fibrosis, such as transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) released by paracrine and autocrine pathways, which induces the differentiation of myofibroblasts and, consequently, the synthesis of matrix proteins, like collagen type I, type III, and fibronectin (Barnes et al. 2011). Fibronectin is responsible for remodeling the matrix, and type I collagen is closely related to this protein. Thus, fibronectin deposition led to an increase in type I collagen fibers in extracellular matrix remodeling (Shi et al. 2010 ). This remodeling can be part of a healing process between 8 and 16 days after inflammation (Broughton et al. 2006 ). In the initial phase of this process, there is a high percentage of type III collagen, which is gradually replaced by type I collagen (Lindsey et al. 2015 ). Therefore, and according to our findings, we believe that the neck region promoted a higher inflammatory reaction than the pinna, showing a significant increase in fibrotic tissue after 15 days of autotransplantation, confirmed by the increase in type I collagen and fibronectin and the reduction in type III collagen, as well as the loss of stromal cells in the region, as discussed earlier. The analysis of stromal cell proliferation showed that the 7-day autotransplantation in the neck region had a higher number of PCNA-positive cells, but this number significantly reduced with 15 days of grafting compared with the control. Similarly, Scalercio et al. ( 2015 ) also obtained an increase in stromal cell proliferation with seven days of subcutaneous autotransplantation of monkey ovarian tissue. However, this reduction in the proliferative potential in the region, with the passage of transplantation time, may have occurred due to the tissue damage that the region developed, such as the loss of stromal population since the first days of transplantation, more tissue fibrosis, provoked by the attempt to reconstruct the damage. Such facts may have affected or inhibited factors responsible for some of the signals that promote proliferation (Vogler et al. 2003 ). In addition, our findings also show that the pinna region was similar to the control throughout transplantation, although, despite the decrease in cell proliferation within 15 days of transplantation, this rate was higher than the neck region. Unlike our findings, Terren et al. ( 2022 ) observed an increase in cell proliferation (by immunostaining with Ki67) and a decrease in fibrosis at 21 days compared to 3 days of cryopreserved whole ovary autotransplantation into the ear of mice. We believe that this difference may be related both to the use of the whole ovary in the study, which may present more coordinated functional responses than small fragments of the same organ in long-term transplant (Terazono et al. 2012b ; Gavish et al. 2014 ; Lew 2019 ), as well as, to injuries and oxidative stress from ischemia-reperfusion, that are severe in transplanted ovarian fragments (Damous et al. 2015 ; Cacciottola et al. 2018 ), as already discussed earlier. However, despite that, the ear region showed a better response than the neck region. In conclusion, this study showed that the pinna could be a potential region for autotransplantation of canine ovarian tissue because it manages to keep the survival of the fragment stable during the 15 days of autotransplantation. We observe this by maintaining morphologically normal follicles and by remodeling the extracellular matrix, through type I collagen and fibronectin. However, in both regions, there was no follicular development, and the density of stromal cells was reduced. Furthermore, although the neck showed a more significant proliferative potential of stromal cells in seven days, this region presented loss of stroma and proliferation within 15 days of autotransplantation, adding to a more significant deposition of tissue fibers when compared to the pinna. It is essential to highlight that this is the first comparative study of canine ovarian tissue autotransplantation between the pinna region and the neck. However, more research is needed to obtain better survival rates and follicular development. Like this, future proposals using antioxidant factors as a pre-treatment may promote adequate support in canine ovarian tissue autotransplantation. This study can contribute to pharmacological research and applications of autotransplantation in animal reproduction centers or zoos to preserve the fertility of precious domestic animals or endangered canine species, respectively. Abbreviations HVSBC-UECE : Veterinary Hospital Prof. Sylvio Barbosa Cardoso of the State University of Ceará MEM-HEPES : Minimum Essential Medium-buffers OSH : ovariosalpingohysterectomy PAF : paraformaldehyde PCNA : proliferating cell nuclear antigen TVT : transmissible venereal tumor SEM : Standard error of the mean Declarations Acknowledgments The authors are grateful for the support of the State University of Ceará (UECE), and collaborators Zoonosis Surveillance Unit (UVZ-Fortaleza/Brazil), Veterinary Hospital Prof. Sylvio Barbosa Cardoso of the State University of Ceará (HVSBC-UECE), Laboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Ovarian Pre-Antral Follicles (LAMOFOPA). Funding The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript. Competing Interests The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Author Contributions The main experimental conception and design were created by Kele Amaral Alves. All laboratory procedures and surgeries were carried out by [Fabiana Aparecida Santilli Brandão], [Danielle Cristina Calado de Brito], [Leda Maria Costa Pereira], [Lucy Vanessa Sulca Ñaupas], [Samara Silva de Sousa], [Duanny Murinelly de Souza Cunha], and [Reginaldo Pereira de Sousa Filho]. Contributed reagents/materials: [Ana Paula Ribeiro Rodrigues] and [Dárcio Ítalo Alves Teixeira]. Data collection, statistical analyses, and interpretation were performed by [Fabiana Aparecida Santilli Brandão], [Benner Geraldo Alves], [Kele Amaral Alves], and [Danielle Cristina Calado de Brito]. Manuscript writing and proofreading: [Fabiana Aparecida Santilli Brandão], [Danielle Cristina Calado de Brito], [Lucy Vanessa Sulca Ñaupas], [Benner Geraldo Alves], and [Kele Amaral Alves]. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Ethics approval All animals were obtained from the Zoonoses Surveillance Unit of Fortaleza, in the State of Ceará, Brazil, with approval and realization under the guidelines of the Ethics Committee for the Use of Animals of the State University of Ceará (3349245/2018). Conflict of Interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that would prejudice the impartiality of this scientific work. Data Availability Not applicable. All data supporting the findings of this study are included within the manuscript. References Abe Y, Suwa Y, Asano T, Ueta YY, Kobayashi N, Ohshima N, Shirasuna S, Abdel-Ghani MA, Oi M, Kobayashi Y, Miyoshi M, Miyahara K, Suzuki H (2011) Cryopreservation of canine embryos. Biol Reprod 84:363-368. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.110.087312 Aerts JM, Oste M, Bols PE (2005) Development and practical applications of a method for repeated transvaginal, ultrasound-guided biopsy collection of the bovine ovary. Theriogenology 64:947-957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.01.011 Alves KA, Alves BG, Gastal GDA, Tarso SGS, Gastal MO, Figueiredo JR, Gambarini ML, Gastal EL (2016) The mare model to study the effects of ovarian dynamics on preantral follicle features. PLoS One 11:e0149693. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149693 Alves KA, Alves BG, Rocha CD, Visonná M, Mohallem RF, Gastal MO, Jacomini JO, Beletti ME, Figueiredo JR, Gambarini ML, Gastal EL (2015) Number and density of equine preantral follicles in different ovarian histological section thicknesses. Theriogenology 83:1048-1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.12.004 Barnes JL, Gorin Y (2011) Myofibroblast Differentiation During Fibrosis: Role of NAD(P)H Oxidases. Kidney Int 79:944-956. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2010.516 Bochner F, Fellus-Alyagor L, Kalchenko V, Shinar S, Neeman M (2015) A Novel Intravital Imaging Window for Longitudinal Microscopy of the Mouse Ovary. Sci Rep 5:12446. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12446 Bordes A, Lornage J, Demirci B, Franck M, Courbiere B, Guerin JF, Salle B (2005) Normal gestations and live births after orthotopic autograft of vitrified–warmed hemi-ovaries into ewes. Hum Reprod 20:2745-2748. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei155 Brandão FAS, Alves BG, Alves KA, Souza SS, Silva YP, Freitas VJF, Teixeira DIA, Gastal EL (2018) Laparoscopic ovarian biopsy pick-up method for goats. Theriogenology 107:219-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.10.042 Brito DCC, Ñaupas LVS, Souza SS, Alcântara GLH, Figueiredo JR, Santos RR, Rodrigues APR (2021) Interference of fixatives and fixation period on the morphologic analysis of ovarian preantral follicles. Zygote 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199421000198. Broughton G, Janis JE, Attinger CE (2006) The basic science of wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:12S-34S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000225430.42531.c2 Cacciottola L, Manavella DD, Amorim CA, Donnez J, Dolmans MM (2018) In vivo characterization of metabolic activity and oxidative stress in grafted human ovarian tissue using microdialysis. Fertil Steril 110:534-544.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.009 Callejo J, Vilaseca S, Ordi J, Cabré S, Lailla JM, Balasch J (2002) Heterotopic ovarian transplantation without vascular pedicle in syngeneic Lewis rats: long-term evaluation of effects on ovarian structure and function. Fertil Steril 77:396-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02970-3 Campos-Junior PH, Alves TJ , Dias MT, Assunçao CM, Munk M, Mattos MS, Kraemer LR, Almeida BG, Russo RC, Barcelos L, Camargo LSA, Viana JHM (2016) Ovarian Grafts 10 Days after Xenotransplantation: Folliculogenesis and Recovery of Viable Oocytes. PLoS One 11:e0158109. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158109 Cao H, Lin W (2019) A Systematic Study on Reproductive Endocrine Function Recovery From Subcutaneous Ovarian Autotransplantation in Mice After 2 Weeks. Transplant Proc 51:2099-2107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.04.023 Costa MM, Gonçalves LP, Lemos MS, Marangon ARM, Lucci CM (2020) Investigation on revascularization time and initial damage after transplantation of fresh and cryopreserved ovarian tissue in domestic cats. Cell Tissue Bank 21:303-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-020-09823-6 Damous LL, Nakamuta JS, Carvalho AES (2015) Scaffold‐based delivery of adipose tissue‐derived stem cells in rat frozen‐thawed ovarian autografts: preliminary studies in a rat model. J Assist Reprod Genet 328:1285-1294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0527-x Degner DA, Walshaw R, Fowler JD, Lanz OI, Ocello P, Maier J, Blaezer L, Smith RJ (2004) Surgical approaches to recipient vessels of the head and neck for microvascular free tissue transfer in dogs. Vet Surg 33:200-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2004.04030.x Donfack NJ, Alves KA, Alves BG, Rocha RMP, Bruno JB, Lima LF, Lobo CH , Santos RR, Domingues SFS, Bertolini M, Smitz J, Rodrigues APR (2018) In vivo and in vitro strategies to support caprine preantral follicle development after ovarian tissue vitrification. Reprod Fertil Dev 30:1055-1065. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD17315 Donfack NJ, Alves KA, Araújo VR, Cordova A, Figueiredo JR, Smitz J, and Rodrigues APR (2017) Expectations and limitations of ovarian tissue transplantation. Zygote 25:391-403. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199417000338 Donnez J, Dolmans MM (2014) Transplantation of ovarian tissue. Best Pract Res Clin Obstetrics Gynaecol 28:1188-1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.09.003 Evans D (1971) A note on the surgical anatomy of the omocervical artery in the dog. Can Anaesth Soc J 18:230-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03025455 Fransolet M, Labied S, Henry L, Masereel MC, Rozet E, Kirschvink N, Nisolle M, and Munaut C (2014) Strategies for using the sheep ovarian cortex as a model in reproductive medicine. PLoS One 9:e91073. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091073 Ganguly B Das U, Das AK. Canine transmissible venereal tumour: a review (2016) Vet Comp Oncol 14:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/vco.12060 Gavish Z, Peer G, Roness H, Cohen Y, Meirow D (2014) Follicle activation and ‘burn-out’ contribute to post-transplantation follicle loss in ovarian tissue grafts: the effect of graft thickness. Hum Reprod 29:989–996. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu015 Hariya M, and Suzuki H (2016). Incidence of apoptotic cells after vitrification in canine ovarian tissues. J Mamm Ova Res 33:69-75. https://doi.org/10.1274/jmor.33.69 Hoekman EJ, Louwe LA , Rooijers M, van der Westerlaken LAJ, Klijn NF, Pilgram GSK, de Kroon CD, and Hilders CGJM (2020) Ovarian tissue cryopreservation: Low usage rates and high live‐birth rate after transplantation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 99:213-221. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13735 IUCN (2021) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, https://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 20 July 2021 Johnson AEM, Freeman EW, Colgin M, McDonough C, and Songsansen N (2014) Induction of ovarian activity and ovulation in an induced ovulator, the maned wolf ( Chrysocyon brachyurus ), using GnRH agonist and recombinant LH. Theriogenology 82:71-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.03.009 Junqueira L, Cossermelli W, and Brentani R (1978) Differential staining of collagens type I, II and III by Sirius red and polarization microscopy. Arch Histol Japon 41:267-274. https://doi.org/10.1679/aohc1950.41.267 Kalogeris T, Baines CP, Krenz M, and Korthuis RJ (2012) Cell biology of ischemia/reperfusion injury. Int Rev Cel Mol Bio 298:229-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394309-5.00006-7 Kim SS, Yang HW, Kang HG, Lee HH, Lee HC, Ko DS, and Gosden RG (2004) Quantitative assessment of ischemic tissue damage in ovarian cortical tissue with or without antioxidant (ascorbic acid) treatment. Fertil Steril 82:679-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.05.022 Khoram H, Najafpour A, Razi M (2011) Follicular Viability and Histological Alterations after Auto-transplantation of Dog Ovaries by Experimentally Inducing Blood Sinus on Stomach. Int J Fertil Steril. 5:27–34. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4040240/ Lee DM, Yeoman RR, Battaglia DE, Stouffer RL, Zelinski-Wooten MB, Fanton JW, Lobo DP (2004) Live birth after ovarian tissue transplant. Nature 428:137-138. https://doi.org/10.1038/428137a Lee SH, Oh HJ, Kim MJ, Kim GA, Setyawan EMN, Ra K, Abdillah DA, Lee BC (2018) Dog cloning-no longer science fiction. Reprod Domest Anim 53:133-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13358 Leonel ECR, Vilela JMV, Paiva REG, Jivago JLPR, Amaral RS, Lucci CM (2018) Restoration of fresh cat ovarian tissue function by autografting to subcutaneous tissue: A pilot study. Theriogenology 105:97-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.09.016 Lew R (2019) Natural history of ovarian function including assessment of ovarian reserve and premature ovarian failure. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet 55:2-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.05.005 Li F, Tao Y, Zhang Y, Li Y, Fang F, Liu Y, H Cao, Zhang X, Zhou S (2010) Follicle growth and oocyte development after ovary transplantation into back muscle of immune-intact adult castrated male mice. Reproduction 140:465-476. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-10-0076 Lindsey ML, Iyer RP, Zamilpa R, Yabluchanskiy A, DeLeon-Pennell KY, Hall ME, Kaplan A, Zouein FA, Bratton D, Flynn ER, Cannon PL, Tian Y, Jin Y-F, Lange RA, Tokmina-Roszyk D, Fields GB, Brás LE de C (2015) A Novel Collagen Matricryptin Reduces Left Ventricular Dilation Post-myocardial Infarction by Promoting Scar Formation and Angiogenesis. J Am Coll Cardiol 66:1364-1374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.035 Oktay K, Turkçuoglu I, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA (2011) Four spontaneous pregnancies and three live births following subcutaneous transplantation of frozen banked ovarian tissue: what is the explanation? Fertil Steril 95:7-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.07.1072 Orozco MM, Ceballos LA, Pino M de la C, Gürtler RE (2014) Local threats and potential infectious hazards to maned wolves ( Chrysocyon brachyurus ) in the southeastern Argentine Chaco. Mammalia 78:339-349. https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2013-0067 Paz RCR (2015) Assisted reproduction in neotropical canidae and Procyonidae. Rev Bras Reprod Anim 39:77-82. http://www.cbra.org.br/pages/publicacoes/rbra/v39n1/pag77-82%20(RB539).pdf. Accessed 26 July 2021 Pinto Y, Alves KA, Alves BG, Souza SS, Brandão FAS, Lima LF, Vicente JFF, Ana PRR, José RF, Eduardo LG, Teixeira DIA (2020) Heterotopic ovarian allotransplantation in goats: Preantral follicle viability and tissue remodeling. Anim Reprod Sci 215:106310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106310 Scalercio SR, Amorim CA, Brito DC, Percário S, Oskam IC, Domingues SFS, Santos RR (2015) Trolox enhances follicular survival after ovarian tissue autograft in squirrel monkey ( Saimiri collinsi ). Reprod Fertil Dev 28:1854-1864. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD14454. Schmidt KL, Byskov AG, Andersen NA, Muller J, Andersen YC (2003) Density and distribution of primordial follicles in single pieces of cortex from 21 patients and in individual pieces of cortex from three entire human ovaries. Hum Reprod 18:1158-1164. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg246 Shi F, Harman J, Fujiwara K, Sottile J (2010) Collagen I matrix turnover is regulated by fibronectin polymerization. Am J Physiol - Cell Physiol 298:C1265-C1275. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00341.2009 Silva JRV, Ferreira MAL, Costa SHF, Santos RR, Carvalho FCA, Rodrigues APR, Lucci CM, Báo SN, Figueiredo JR (2002) Degeneration rate of preantral follicles in the ovaries of goats. Small Rum Res 43:203-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(02)00017-2 Slegtenhorst BR, Dor FJMF, Rodriguez H, Voskuil FJ, Tullius SG (2014) Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury and its Consequences on Immunity and Inflammation. Curr Transpl Rep 1:147-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40472-014-0017-6 Soleimani R, Heytens E, Oktay K (2011) Enhancement of Neoangiogenesis and Follicle Survival by Sphingosine-1-Phosphate in Human Ovarian Tissue Xenotransplants. PLoS One 6:e19475. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019475 Souza SS, Alves BG, Alves KA, Brandão FAS, Brito DCC, Gastal MO, Rodrigues APR, Figueiredo JR, Teixeira DIA, Gastal EL (2020) Heterotopic autotransplantation of ovarian tissue in a large animal model: Effects of cooling and VEGF. PLoS One 15: e0241442. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241442 Tammiste T, Kask K, Padrik P, Idla K, Rosenstein K, Jatsenko T, Veerus P, Salumets A (2019) A case report and follow-up of the first live birth after heterotopic transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in Eastern Europe. BMC Womens Health 19:65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0764-8 Terazono T, Inoue M, Kaedei Y, Tanihara F, Namula Z, Viet VL, Taura Y, Takagi M, Takuma T, Otoi T (2012a) Assessment of canine ovaries autografted to various body sites. Theriogenology 77:131-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.07.026 Terazono T, Kaedei Y, Tanihara F, Namula Z, Viet V, Takagi M, Inoue M, Sato Y, Taniguchi M, Otoi T (2012b) Follicle formation in the canine ovary after autografting to a peripheral site. Reprod Domest Anim. 47:e16-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01880.x Terren C, Bindels J, Nisolle M, Noël A, Munaut C (2022) Evaluation of an alternative heterotopic transplantation model for ovarian tissue to test pharmaceuticals improvements for fertility restoration. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 20:35. https://rbej.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12958-022-00910-9 Van Eyck AS, Bouzin C, Feron O, Romeu L, Van Langendonckt A, Donnez J, Dolmans MM (2010) Both host and graft vessels contribute to revascularization of xenografted human ovarian tissue in a murine model. Fertil Steril 93:1676-1685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.048 Vilela JMV, Leonel ECR, Gonçalves LP, Paiva REG, Amaral RS, Amorim CA, Lucci CM (2019) Function of Cryopreserved Cat Ovarian Tissue after Autotransplantation. Animals 1065:1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9121065 Vogler R, Sauer B, Kim DS, Schäfer-Korting M, Kleuser B (2003) Sphingosine-1-phosphate and its potentially paradoxical effects on critical parameters of cutaneous wound healing. J Invest Dermatol 120:693-700. https://www.jidonline.org/article/S0022-202X(15)30206-2/fulltext Wakasa I, Hayashi M, Abe Y, Suzuki H (2017) Distribution of follicles in canine ovarian tissues and xenotransplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissues with even distribution of follicles. Reprod Domest Anim 52:219-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12857 Webb R, Buratini J, Hernandez-Medrano JH, Gutierrez CG, Campbell BK (2016) Follicle development and selection: past, present and future. Anim Reprod 13;234-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.21451/1984-3143-AR883 Wiedemann C, Hribal R, Ringleb J, Bertelsen MF, Rasmusen K, Andersen CY, Kristensen SG, Jewgenow K (2012) Preservation of primordial follicles from lions by slow freezing and xenotransplantation of ovarian cortex into an immunodeficient mouse. Reprod Domest Anim 47:300-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12081 Wiweko B, Soebijanto S, Boediono A, Mansyur M, Siregar NC, Suryandari DA, Aulia A, Djuwantono T, Affandi B (2019) Survival of isolated human preantral follicles after vitrification: Analyses of morphology and Fas ligand and caspase-3 mRNA expression. Clin Exp Reprod Med 46:152-165. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2019.00143 Youm HW, Lee JR, Lee J, Jee BC, Suh SC, Kim SH (2015) Transplantation of mouse ovarian tissue: Comparison of the transplantation sites. Theriogenology 83:854-861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.11.026 Zhou F, Shi LB, Zhang SY (2017) Ovarian fibrosis: A phenomenon of concern. Chin Med J (Engl) 130:365-371. https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.198931 Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 18 May, 2023 Read the published version in Veterinary Research Communications → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Major revision 24 Apr, 2023 Reviews received at journal 21 Feb, 2023 Reviewers agreed at journal 16 Feb, 2023 Reviewers invited by journal 15 Feb, 2023 Editor assigned by journal 08 Feb, 2023 Submission checks completed at journal 08 Feb, 2023 First submitted to journal 08 Feb, 2023 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-2564726","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":174593609,"identity":"7a0fd9c1-13d6-4543-899b-0a7617eeb518","order_by":0,"name":"Fabiana AS Brandão","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"State University of Ceará","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Fabiana","middleName":"AS","lastName":"Brandão","suffix":""},{"id":174593611,"identity":"d10fb565-29cc-46d0-8f0b-e8aee8983c5b","order_by":1,"name":"Danielle CC Brito","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"State University of Ceará","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Danielle","middleName":"CC","lastName":"Brito","suffix":""},{"id":174593613,"identity":"4dae21df-9be5-4918-920c-b7fd0ae3b1ea","order_by":2,"name":"Leda MC Pereira","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"State University of Ceará","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Leda","middleName":"MC","lastName":"Pereira","suffix":""},{"id":174593615,"identity":"2c1c29d7-6954-4165-a6f9-1e2a20b3bcf8","order_by":3,"name":"Kele A Alves","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ovid Research Company","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kele","middleName":"A","lastName":"Alves","suffix":""},{"id":174593616,"identity":"8deb80c9-670c-4977-a38f-16ba2501fbce","order_by":4,"name":"Lucy VS Ñaupas","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"State University of Ceará","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lucy","middleName":"VS","lastName":"Ñaupas","suffix":""},{"id":174593617,"identity":"651306f2-42ff-43dd-9249-d21f5de4c351","order_by":5,"name":"Samara S Souza","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"State University of Ceará","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Samara","middleName":"S","lastName":"Souza","suffix":""},{"id":174593618,"identity":"36026b76-2897-4bd1-a06d-c2258a84ebf1","order_by":6,"name":"Duanny M S Cunha","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"State University of Ceará","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Duanny","middleName":"M S","lastName":"Cunha","suffix":""},{"id":174593619,"identity":"f78aca9c-d72d-4f4e-8524-adcab9247ae8","order_by":7,"name":"Reginaldo P S Filho","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"State University of Ceará","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Reginaldo","middleName":"P S","lastName":"Filho","suffix":""},{"id":174593620,"identity":"e9c7aa28-cfb9-43c6-98b0-54040d48f71e","order_by":8,"name":"Benner G Alves","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ovid Research Company","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Benner","middleName":"G","lastName":"Alves","suffix":""},{"id":174593621,"identity":"cba2edd3-905c-4abc-a50d-ed83a98c164f","order_by":9,"name":"Ana PR Rodrigues","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"State University of Ceará","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ana","middleName":"PR","lastName":"Rodrigues","suffix":""},{"id":174593622,"identity":"af9dee0a-aef5-44f8-94f5-840b3ca53f53","order_by":10,"name":"Dárcio IA Teixeira","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"State University of Ceará","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Dárcio","middleName":"IA","lastName":"Teixeira","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2023-02-08 13:14:35","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2564726/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2564726/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-023-10139-5","type":"published","date":"2023-05-18T20:53:26+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":32777011,"identity":"4f95a225-a61c-423e-8cf1-5a97c0232102","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2023-02-10 22:31:02","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":453003,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSchematic illustration of the experimental design of the present study: (1) Ovary; (2) puncture with punch; (3) ovarian fragments; (4) fixation of control fragments; (5) autotransplantation of canine ovarian fragments in pinna (Pi) and on the neck (Ne) for 7 and 15 days. Representative images of the grafts in Pi (A) and Ne (B).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2564726/v1/1921fb1525de099a9361e876.png"},{"id":32777014,"identity":"94f80fdd-3fe4-46e1-a4b3-4deaa1369733","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2023-02-10 22:31:03","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":4454423,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003ePercentages (± SEM) of morphologically normal preantral follicles between treatments (A), regions (a\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e/b\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e), and autotransplantation days (a\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e/b\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e) of canine ovarian tissue. Representative images showing histological aspects of normal morphological preantral follicles of fresh control (B) and autotransplants in the pinna for 7/15 days (C/D) and in the neck for 7/15 days (E/F). Bar 40 µm. Larger graphics: * indicates a significant difference with FC; \u003csup\u003ea,b\u003c/sup\u003e indicate differences between days in the same region; \u003csup\u003eA,B\u003c/sup\u003e indicate same-day differences between different regions. Smaller graphics: \u003csup\u003eA,B\u003c/sup\u003e indicate significant differences.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2564726/v1/ab46f987cf79771bc8c993bb.png"},{"id":32777012,"identity":"ff2260a4-598f-4b04-bbd1-1b49cab16a18","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2023-02-10 22:31:03","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":2153867,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eCell density/2500μm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e between treatments (A), regions (a\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e), and autotransplant days (a\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e). Representative images of the fresh control stroma (B) and pinna autotransplants for 7/15 days (C/D) and in the neck for 7/15 days (E/F). Black arrows indicate a decrease in stromal cells. Bar 40 µm. Larger graphic: * indicates a significant difference with FC; \u003csup\u003ea,b\u003c/sup\u003e indicate differences between days in the same region; \u003csup\u003eA,B\u003c/sup\u003e indicate same-day differences between different regions. Smaller graphics: \u003csup\u003eA,B\u003c/sup\u003e indicate significant differences.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2564726/v1/41f3bbaf9af907ec1f54770e.png"},{"id":32777186,"identity":"ada8b20d-d9bf-45d4-86ef-86c8209fcadc","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2023-02-10 22:39:03","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":3397763,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eQuantification of type I collagen (A) and type III (B), as for the regions (a\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e/b\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e) and autotransplant days (a\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e/b\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e). Representative images of picrosirius staining, highlighting type I collagens (C-G), III (H-L), and the merge (M-Q) of the respective treatments. Bar 40 µm. Larger graphics: * indicates a significant difference with FC; \u003csup\u003ea,b\u003c/sup\u003e indicate differences between days in the same region; \u003csup\u003eA,B\u003c/sup\u003e indicate same-day differences between different regions. Smaller graphics: \u003csup\u003eA,B\u003c/sup\u003e indicate significant differences.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2564726/v1/5c4f921dfdf335b0c3ed6b24.png"},{"id":32777187,"identity":"7acb875b-fcdf-42d9-bfc3-49b779ff2a25","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2023-02-10 22:39:03","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":4719151,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003ePercentages (± SEM) of PCNA immunostaining (A) and fibronectin (B), as for the region effect (a\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e/b\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e) and autotransplant days (a\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e/b\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e). Representative images of PCNA marking (C-H) and fibronectin (I-N) in the negative control (-), positive (+), and in the respective treatments. Bar 40 µm. Larger graphics: * indicates a significant difference with FC; \u003csup\u003ea,b\u003c/sup\u003e indicate differences between days in the same region; \u003csup\u003eA,B\u003c/sup\u003e indicate same-day differences between different regions. Smaller graphics: \u003csup\u003eA,B\u003c/sup\u003e indicate significant differences.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2564726/v1/80c32e1c153f6de2ae05c60d.png"},{"id":44729216,"identity":"4cd2ec44-d2af-42dc-aecd-9674c6284eef","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2023-10-16 21:14:11","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":3683454,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2564726/v1/f4c2d811-e09f-42c0-8486-102fce0ab897.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Effects of different subcutaneous sites on heterotopic autotransplantation of canine ovarian tissue","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe wild canid population has been constantly affected due to anthropic actions, like deforestation, which can lead to invasion of urban environments, roadkill, and, consequently, the death of these individuals (Orozco et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e). Thus, some canid species have been classified as vulnerable or \"near threatened\" (IUCN \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Therefore, different reproductive strategies are being developed to preserve the fertility of both wild species that are at risk of extinction, as well as domestic animals of high genetic value, commercial or sentimental, using animal models (Abe et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Johnson et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e; Paz \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Lee et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e), that can even configure applications for human reproduction (Scalercio et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Donfack et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Costa et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Souza et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTransplantation of ovarian tissue, associated with cryopreservation, has become an increasingly important tool in studies focused on folliculogenesis and reproductive biology (Terazono et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012a\u003c/span\u003e; Campos-Junior et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e), enabling fertility restoration (Bordes et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e; Donnez et al. 2014; Tammiste et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Hockman et al. 2020). Among the types of transplants, autotransplantation has been showing highlights for not requiring immunosuppressive therapy, immune regulators, or knockout mice and for presenting less possibility of rejection (Costa et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). In addition, allotransplantation or xenotransplantation requires expensive techniques and specialized and equipped laboratories. Thus, autotransplantation can be considered an alternative for preserving the fertility of canid species, especially for those who have undergone oncological treatment, as in the case of transmissible venereal tumor (TVT) common in domestic dogs (Ganguly et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). Heterotopic implantation sites have been considered in autotransplants (Lee et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e). The subcutaneous site has proven to be a suitable environment because it is easy to monitor and access, is low invasive (Souza et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), and does not require general anesthesia (Donfack et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e), in addition to facilitating graft recovery. These sites are considered preferred sites for collecting oocytes to be used in \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e fertilization (Costa et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). In subcutaneous sites, the neck region has been used to obtain favorable follicular survival rates and functional resumption of ovarian tissue after autotransplantation (Leonel et al. 2004; Vilela et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Costa et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Souza et al. 2019; Souza et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Souza et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). However, despite the good results obtained, the type of region used can also hinder the success of subcutaneous autotransplantation due to hypoxia or ischemia/reperfusion injury, to which the tissue can be subjected (Donfack et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). This way, other subcutaneous regions must be considered. Recently, Terren et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) performed autotransplantation of cryopreserved whole ovaries from mice, between the outer layer of skin and the cartilage of the ear, with recovery up to 21 days and obtained an increase in vascularization and cell proliferation in the ovary. These results led the authors to conclude that the ear transplant model may be suitable for ovarian tissue transplantation and helpful in testing pharmaceutical strategies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegarding the quality of ovarian tissue after autotransplantation, preantral follicles morphology and stromal density have been frequently used (Pinto et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Souza et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Furthermore, the expression of proliferation markers, such as PCNA (proliferating-cell nuclear antigen), has played an essential role in the functionality of ovarian tissue after transplantation (Hariya et al. 2016). Excessive deposition of extracellular matrix components can also determine the quality of the graft and is considered indicative of tissue fibrosis, one of the main obstacles in transplant systems (Scalercio et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Souza et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Among the factors involved in fibrosis formation, the synthesis of extracellular matrix proteins can be highlighted, like collagen type I, type III, and fibronectin (Barnes and Gorin, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e), which are responsible for remodeling the tissue matrix, mainly after cell loss (Scalercio et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Zhou et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Souza et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBased on that, the present study aimed to evaluate, for the first time in female dogs, the effect of the pinna and neck regions in the subcutaneous site on autotransplantation of ovarian tissue for 7 and 15 days, about the normality of preantral follicles, development and stromal density, as well as tissue proliferation and fibrosis, using the domestic dog as an experimental model.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials And Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eEthical aspects\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e This study was approved and carried out under the Ethics in Animal Use Committee guidelines of the State University of Cear\u0026aacute; (3349245/2018).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eChemicals\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eUnless otherwise indicated, the chemical reagents used in this study are from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eOrigin of animals and collection of ovarian tissue\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eEight adult female dogs (3\u0026ndash;6 years old), mixed breed, in distinct phases estrous phases (two females in anestrus and the others in diestrus), belonging to the Zoonosis Surveillance Unit (UVZ - Fortaleza, Cear\u0026aacute;, Brazil), were submitted to ovariosalpingohysterectomy (OSH) at Veterinary Hospital Prof. Sylvio Barbosa Cardoso of the State University of Cear\u0026aacute; (HVSBC-UECE). After OSH, the ovarian bursa was removed, and the ovaries were washed once in 70% alcohol and twice in the Minimum Essential Medium (MEM-HEPES) supplemented with 100 \u0026micro;g/mL of penicillin and 100 \u0026micro;g/mL of streptomycin. Then, the ovaries were sectioned with the auxiliary of a 2 mm punch device (Punch Keyes for 2mm Skin Biopsy - ABC Surgical Instruments, S\u0026atilde;o Paulo, Brazil) to obtain fragments of sizes 2 x 2 mm, according to the modified protocol by Wiedemann et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eExperimental design\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFifteen fragments (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;15) were recovered by each pair of ovaries from eight females and randomly distributed in different experimental conditions (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). Three fragments (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;3) were fixed immediately and classified as fresh control (FC). Then, the remaining fragments (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;12) were autotransplanted subcutaneously in the following regions (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eA and B): external side of the pinna for 7 days (Pi-7; n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;3) and 15 days (Pi-15; n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;3); lateral neck for 7 days (Ne-7; n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;3) and 15 days (Ne-15; n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;3). This procedure was repeated eight times, with a total of 120 fragments. After the transplantation time had elapsed, all fragments were submitted to histological, histochemical (picrosirius), and immunohistochemistry evaluation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eAutotransplantation and recovery of fragments\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e Autotransplantation was performed according to an adaptation of the anesthetic and surgical protocol described by Terazono et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012a\u003c/span\u003e). Briefly, the bitches were induced with intramuscular anesthesia of 0.3 mg/kg of methadone hydrochloride (10 mg/mL; Mytedom, S\u0026atilde;o Paulo, Brazil) and intravenous midazolam hydrochloride of 0.5 mg/kg (5 mg; Dormire, S\u0026atilde;o Paulo, Brazil) associated with 2.0 mg/kg of ketamine hydrochloride (10%; Ketamine; S\u0026atilde;o Paulo, Brazil), and 4 mg/kg of propofol (10 mg/mL; Propovan, S\u0026atilde;o Paulo, Brazil). Furthermore, inhalation of 3% isoflurane (Isoflurane, S\u0026atilde;o Paulo, Brazil) and oxygen maintained anesthesia. Thus, after performing OSH, ovarian fragments were obtained from the ovarian cortex using the punch device. Then, for autotransplantation, a subcutaneous cut was made in the dorsal region of the neck or on the convex side of the pinna; the fragments were fixed using surgical 6\u0026thinsp;\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0 nylon. Next, the suture of the subcutaneous cut was performed with 3\u0026thinsp;\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0 nylon thread.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAfter seven days of transplant, three grafts were recovered from each region (pinna and neck). The animals received 0.3 mg/kg of methadone hydrochloride intramuscularly and intravenously, combining 0.5 mg/kg of midazolam hydrochloride and 5.0 mg/kg of ketamine hydrochloride. Furthermore, local anesthesia was applied using 2 mL of lidocaine hydrochloride (2%; Xylestesin, S\u0026atilde;o Paulo, Brazil). Posteriorly, at the end of the 15 days, the same animals were euthanized to remove the other grafts in the respective regions. Thus, 0.3 mg/kg of methadone hydrochloride was administered intramuscularly and 25 mg/mL of thiopental intravenous (50 mg/mL; Thiopentax, S\u0026atilde;o Paulo, Brazil) until the loss of consciousness. Then, 1 mL/kg of potassium chloride was applied intravenously (10%; Potassium chloride, S\u0026atilde;o Paulo, Brazil) following the standard protocol of the HVSBC-UECE.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eMacroscopy of the grafts\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe recovery rate was determined, and the macroscopic appearance of the recovered fragments was qualitatively described using a scoring system (see Table \u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e), following the criteria: (I) \u003cem\u003emorphology\u003c/em\u003e, considering if the graft is necrotic, intact (similar to the original fragment) or swollen; (II) \u003cem\u003eadhesion\u003c/em\u003e when the graft is only secured by the suture (absent tissue adhesion) or adhered to host tissue; (III) extent of \u003cem\u003ebleeding\u003c/em\u003e at the time of graft removal. The data were presented as median. Furthermore, the presence or absence of suture in the graft was observed. A single individual performed all evaluations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMacroscopic criteria of canine ovarian tissue after transplantation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eScore\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMorphology\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdhesion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBleeding\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNecrotic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAbsent\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAbsent\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModerately necrotic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWeak\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWeak\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntact\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModerate\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModerate\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModerately swollen\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStrong\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStrong\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSwollen\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVery strong\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVery strong\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eHistological analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFresh and autotransplanted ovarian fragments were fixed in Davidson's solution (Formalin 22.2%, alcohol 33.4%, glacial acetic acid 11%, and tap water) for 12 hours at room temperature (Brito et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Posteriorly, they were dehydrated, clarified, included in paraffin, and sectioned at 5 \u0026micro;m. A total of 7736 sections were obtained (~\u0026thinsp;1547 per treatment) and stained with periodic acid-Schiff - hematoxylin. The preantral follicles were analyzed under an optical microscope (Nikon E200; Tokyo, Japan) with 400х magnification and classified as morphologically normal when they contained oocytes, cytoplasm, and intact granulosa cells; or degenerated when they presented cytoplasmic retraction, presence of a pyknotic nucleus, and disorganization of granulosa cells (Silva et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e). Morphology evaluations were performed only in follicles with a visible nucleus. Furthermore, the preantral follicles were classified as primordial (oocyte surrounded by one layer of flattened granulosa cells) and based on the stage of development as follows: transitional (one layer of flattened and cuboidal granulosa cells), primary (one layer of cuboidal granulosa cells around the oocyte), and secondary (oocyte surrounded by two or more layers of cuboidal granulosa cells) follicles (Souza et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eDensity of stromal cells\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor cell density of ovarian stroma, 10% of the histological sections of each ovary fragment were analyzed, recording the average of cells from four random quadrants (50 \u0026times; 50 \u0026micro;m\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;2,500 \u0026micro;m\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e), as described by Alves et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). A single operator performed all evaluations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePicrosirius\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAccording to Scalercio et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e), the density of collagen-rich deposits was analyzed. The sections of the ovarian fragments of all experimental conditions were processed according to classic histology and stained using the standard picrosirius red staining protocol (0.1%) (# 365548-5G) with a saturated picric acid solution (1.2%), for 1 hour, at room temperature. For the evaluation, four sections were photographed under polarization microscopy (Nikon E200; Tokyo, Japan) at 400\u0026times; magnification, coupled with an image capture system (Nikon, Coolpix 4500). Collagen fibers were determined using the different polarizing colors of collagen I and III types, yellowish-orange and green birefringence, respectively (Junqueira et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1978\u003c/span\u003e). Image analysis was performed by measuring the red threshold, green and blue to obtain the percentages of the red and green colors, expressed in pixels (ImageJ software, version 1.45; National Institutes of Health, USA) (Pinto et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eImmunohistochemistry\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eOvarian fragments from all experimental conditions were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PAF) at room temperature for 2 hours, dehydrated, clarified, included in paraffin, and sectioned at 5 \u0026micro;m. The sections were mounted on positively charged slides and processed for immunohistochemistry for PCNA and fibronectin proteins. For antigenic recovery, the slides were incubated in a recovery buffer at 98\u0026deg;C for 20 minutes (protein specific pH; Dako, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The blocking of endogenous peroxidase activity was performed using 10% hydrogen peroxide in methanol. Then, incubation was performed with rabbit polyclonal to PCNA (1:1000; AB2426, Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, 461 USA) or rabbit polyclonal to fibronectin (1:50; AB2413, Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, 461 USA) primary antibody for 30 minutes. Posteriorly, the slides were incubated for 30 minutes with the biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1:200; AB9049, Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, 461 USA). Finally, the slides were incubated for 30 minutes with the avidin-biotin enzyme complex (ABC; Vector laboratories, 465 Burlingame, CA, USA) to react with chromogen 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB, ACB030; ScyTek Laboratories Inc., West Logan, USA) for 5 minutes. Hematoxylin and 0.5% ammonia solution were used as counterstain. The negative control was performed by omitting the primary antibody. For positive control, they used mouse spleen tissue for PCNA and fibronectin. The evaluation of the PCNA was performed on the stromal cells; in an area of 400 \u0026micro;m\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e, the proliferation of stromal cells and the percentage of stromal cells positive for PCNA were determined (Hariya et al. 2016). However, the evaluation of tissue fibrosis was determined using the modified H-score method, described by Wiweko et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e), \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\(H-score = \\% marked area \\left(400 {\\mu m}^{2}\\right) x (color intensity + 1)\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. The color intensity was obtained by the intensity scale (weak = 1, medium = 2, strong = 3).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStatistical Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe statistical analyzes were performed using Sigma Plot (version 11.0 Systat Software Inc., USA). When appropriate, normality (Shapiro-Wilk) and homogeneity of variance tests (Levene's) were performed. One-way ANOVA, followed by post-hoc test, was used to verify differences between the fresh control and the other treatments. Two-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the main effects (factors) of the transplant region (Pi \u003cem\u003evs.\u003c/em\u003e Ne) and days post-transplant (7 \u003cem\u003evs.\u003c/em\u003e 15). All data were presented as the mean and standard error of the mean (\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SEM), and differences were considered significant when P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eRecovery rate and macroscopic aspects of the graft\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecovery rates in Pi-7 regions, Ne-7 and Ne-15, were 100% (24/24); only the Pi-15 region obtained 95,8% (23/24). The median of the scores referring to the macroscopic criteria of the recovered grafts are shown (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). Most grafts recovered showed intact morphology, similar to the original fragment, except the Pi-15 region, which presented three grafts (3/23) moderately swollen and whitish. The fragments with a longer transplant time (15 days) visibly showed greater adherence regarding adherence to host tissue. Most fragments did not show bleeding, except for the 15-day grafts from the Ne region, which had few bleeding points. Regarding the presence of sutures, all grafts kept their original suture.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMedian of the scores referring to the macroscopic criteria of the grafts recovered from the pinna (Pi) and neck (Ne) regions of canine ovarian autotransplantation after 7 and 15 days\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c4\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMacroscopic criteria and points\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTreatment\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMorphology\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdhesion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBleeding\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePi-7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePi-15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNe-7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNe-15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eMorphology and development of preantral follicles\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA total of 3502 preantral follicles were analyzed in the present study. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eA shows the percentage of morphologically normal preantral follicles. Representative images are shown (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eB-F). As observed, despite the percentage of morphologically normal follicles having decreased in Pi-7 (78.5\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.6; P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05), when compared to FC (90.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.8), the Pi-15 (86.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;7.6) and Ne-7 (92.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.3) regions did not show significant difference with FC. However, curiously, after 15 days of autotransplantation, the Ne region showed an increase (97.0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.2; P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) in the percentage of normal follicles compared to FC. When treatments were compared, it was observed that the percentage of normal follicles did not differ (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) between days in both regions. However, Ne-7 had a percentage of normal follicles significantly higher than Pi-7. In contrast, this percentage was similar between Pi-15 and Ne-15 (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.05).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe effect of the region (Pi \u003cem\u003evs.\u003c/em\u003e Ne) and day (7 \u003cem\u003evs.\u003c/em\u003e 15) on the percentage of morphologically normal follicles is shown in Figs.\u0026nbsp;2a\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e and 2a\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e, respectively. One can observe that the Ne region (94.9\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.1) was significantly superior to the Pi (82.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.2). However, the day effect did not change (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) the normality rate of preantral follicles in transplanted tissues in different regions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn addition, our data also showed that the percentages of developing preantral follicles (transitional, primary and secondary) were significantly lower in both regions after 7 and 15 days of autotransplantation compared to the control.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStromal cell density\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFigure \u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eA shows the density of stromal cells in each treatment, and their representative images are shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eB-F. Stromal density was significantly reduced in all transplants when compared to FC. In addition, between treatments, it was observed that autotransplantation for 15 days also caused a significant reduction in stromal cell density in both regions; however, although Pi-7 had a higher stromal density (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) than Ne-7, both regions (Pi and Ne) were similar (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) after 15 days of autotransplantation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhen the effect of the region (Pi \u003cem\u003evs.\u003c/em\u003e Ne) and day (7 \u003cem\u003evs.\u003c/em\u003e 15) of the autotransplant was analyzed on density (Fig.\u0026nbsp;3a\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e and 3a\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e), one can be observed that region Pi and day 7 had a higher density of stromal cells.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eQuantification of collagen fibers type I and III\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003ePicrosirius staining revealed that all autotransplants had high levels of type I collagen fibers (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eA; P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) and a reduction in type III collagen (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eB; P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) compared to FC. Furthermore, when comparing the treatments, it was observed that the Pi region maintained similar levels of type I collagen between days 7 and 15 (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). In contrast, Ne-15 promoted a higher deposit of the fiber type I than Ne-7 (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). Unlike that, the type III collagen level showed a significant reduction after 15 days of autotransplantation in both regions. No difference in collagen I and III levels was observed when the Pi and Ne regions were compared on the same day. Representative images of picrosirius coloration in the respective treatments are shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e (C-Q).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdditionally, no statistical difference was observed between regions (Pi \u003cem\u003evs\u003c/em\u003e. Ne) on type I (Fig.\u0026nbsp;4a\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e) and III (Fig.\u0026nbsp;4b\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e) collagen deposition. However, regarding the day effect (7 \u003cem\u003evs\u003c/em\u003e. 15), day 7 had the lowest level of collagen type I (Fig.\u0026nbsp;4a\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e; P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) and the highest level of collagen III (Fig.\u0026nbsp;4b\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e; P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) compared to 15 days.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec19\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eProfile of the immunostaining\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec20\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePCNA (stromal cell proliferation)\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAccording to Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eA, no significant difference with FC was observed in the Pi region on both days of autotransplantation (7 and 15). However, although the Ne region showed an increased cell proliferation within seven days (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05), there was a significant reduction after 15 days of autotransplantation compared to FC. This reduction after 15 days was observed in both regions (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) when days 7 and 15 were compared among themselves, although being more pronounced in Ne. In contrast, when different regions were compared, it can be observed that although Pi-7 had lower cell proliferation than Ne-7 (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05), Pi-15 has shown to be significantly superior to Ne-15. Representative images are shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e (C-H).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo significant differences were observed when the region effect (Pi vs. Ne) was analyzed (Fig.\u0026nbsp;5a\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e). Although, regarding the day effect, day 7 showed a significantly greater proliferation than day 15 of autotransplantation (Fig.\u0026nbsp;5a\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec21\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eFibronectin\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFigure \u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eB shows that fibronectin labeling was significantly higher in all autotransplant treatments compared with FC. Conversely, between treatments, it has been observed that the Pi region did not show any difference between days (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.05), unlike the Ne region, which showed the highest percentage of labeling in Ne-15 (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). However, the comparison between different regions showed that Pi-7 was significantly higher than Ne-7. Nevertheless, after 15 days of autotransplantation, the Pi region had a lower level of fibronectin labeling than the Ne region (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). Representative images are shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eI-N.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe effect of the region (Pi \u003cem\u003evs\u003c/em\u003e. Ne) and day (7 \u003cem\u003evs.\u003c/em\u003e 15) are shown in Figs.\u0026nbsp;5b\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e and 5b\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e, respectively. No significant differences were observed between regions under fibronectin labeling. However, concerning the day effect, it has been observed that day 15 had a significantly higher labeling level than day 7 of autotransplantation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eOvarian tissue transplantation may be a promising technique for resuming the reproductive potential of domestic species with high genetic value or endangered wild species (Terazono et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012a\u003c/span\u003e; Leonel et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). Still, among the types of transplants, autotransplantation has stood out for preventing graft rejection and not requiring immunosuppressive therapy (Costa et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). However, the graft region has been considered essential in maintaining and functional resumption of ovarian tissue in transplantation (Cao and Li, 2019). Thus, using the domestic dog as a model, the present study investigated for the first time the effect of the pinna and neck region on heterotopic autotransplantation of ovarian tissue for 7 and 15 days.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOur macroscopic findings showed that most of the recovered grafts were morphologically intact. Furthermore, during the 15 days of transplantation, grafts showed greater adherence in both regions studied (pinna and neck). However, the Ne-15 stood out for having presented bleeding on withdrawal. Pinto et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) also observed good adhesion and bleeding upon graft removal, in the subcutaneous site in the neck region, in 15 days of goat ovarian tissue allotransplantation. The subcutaneous implantation site has been widely used for the grafting of ovarian tissue from different species (Oktay et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Scalercio et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Youm et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Pinto et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Souza et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) for being a place of easy access and monitoring with little invasiveness (Souza et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). However, this is the first study using a subcutaneous site in the pinna region in female dogs. The subcutaneous site in the neck region is known to be more anatomically irrigated than in the pinna region (Evans, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1971\u003c/span\u003e; Degner et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e); this fact may justify the bleeding observed in the neck region after removal in 15 days of autotransplantation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe present study also showed that the neck region maintained rates of morphologically normal preantral follicles similar to and higher than the control in 7 and 15 days of autotransplantation, respectively. However, the pinna region showed a percentage similar to the neck region and the control in 15 days of autotransplantation. Studies have suggested that transplant sites with greater vascularization have better rates of morphologically normal follicles (Youm et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Donfack et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Pinto et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) by allowing better support of nutrients and essential factors for survival maintenance. This fact may explain our findings in the neck region, although the ear region needed more transplant days for better support and maintenance, despite being a region less vascularized than the neck. However, we believe that the higher percentage of normal follicles found in Ne-15, compared to control, may be due to follicular heterogeneity, i.e., variation in follicular density in the same fragment often found in different regions of the mammalian ovary cortex (Schmidt et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e; Aerts et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e; Fransolet et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e; Alves et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Wakasa et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Brand\u0026atilde;o et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite the results obtained in morphological normality, our data showed that autotransplantation in both regions did not show follicular development after days 7 and 15, in addition to presenting a reduction in preantral follicles in development (transitional, primary, and secondary). Significant reductions in follicular density are reported after autotransplantation of ovarian tissue in the subcutaneous region of the neck for seven days in mares (Souza et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) and the dorsal subcutaneous region for seven days in monkeys (Scalercio et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). In contrast, Khoram et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e) demonstrated that 75\u0026ndash;76% of follicles survived ischemia after isotransplantation of canine hemi-ovaries in the muscle layer region of the stomach wall for 60 days. Despite the promising results of this study, the methodology used in the use of hemi-ovaries differs from our study, because we use ovarian fragments of sizes 2 x 2 mm, which may respond differently to a transplant. Since developing follicles are more susceptible than quiescent preantral follicles (Webb et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). Furthermore, Li et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e) showed that follicular death occurs soon after transplantation due to ischemia-reperfusion injury, as well as long periods of hypoxia (Damous et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e) and oxidative stress (Cacciottola et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). These factors can cause follicular depletion during the first few days after transplantation and continue for about a week until the revascularization process is completed (Van Eyck et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e; Soleimani et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e), thus being considered the main obstacles to the technique's success.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLikewise, stromal cell density was also affected by autotransplantation in both regions, mainly after seven days. These findings were similar to those observed in ovarian tissue transplants at intramuscular and subcutaneous sites (Pinto et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Souza et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). However, curiously, the neck region showed a more significant reduction than the pinna region within seven days of transplantation. Kim et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e) demonstrated that stromal cells are more vulnerable to ischemia than ovarian follicles. Thus, it is assumed that the damage to the graft in the first days of avascular transplantation and the vulnerability of stromal cells may have contributed to reducing these cells. Furthermore, the neck region, being more vascularized, can facilitate a series of cellular processes, such as the production of inflammatory cytokines, which can intensify tissue damage (Kalogeris et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e; Slegtenhorst et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegarding matrix proteins, our data also showed that autotransplantation caused an increase in type I collagen and fibronectin, but a reduction in collagen type III in the two regions studied when compared with the control. Furthermore, an intriguing finding, high rates of type I collagen and fibronectin were observed in autotransplants only in the neck region (15 days). On the contrary, between 7 and 15 days of autotransplantation, type III collagen rates were reduced by almost half in both regions. Unlike our findings, Souza et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) observed that ovarian fragments from mares treated with VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) before autotransplantation subcutaneous obtained a reduction in type I collagen and an increase in type III collagen when compared to the non-transplanted control. The ovarian cortex comprises connective tissue cells and collagen fibers (Bochner et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). The events surrounding ovarian fibrosis are very complex, but they usually involve a proliferation of fibroblasts and excessive deposition of extracellular matrix, characterizing fibrosis (Zhou et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). Several factors are involved in the formation of fibrosis, such as transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) released by paracrine and autocrine pathways, which induces the differentiation of myofibroblasts and, consequently, the synthesis of matrix proteins, like collagen type I, type III, and fibronectin (Barnes et al. 2011). Fibronectin is responsible for remodeling the matrix, and type I collagen is closely related to this protein. Thus, fibronectin deposition led to an increase in type I collagen fibers in extracellular matrix remodeling (Shi et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). This remodeling can be part of a healing process between 8 and 16 days after inflammation (Broughton et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e). In the initial phase of this process, there is a high percentage of type III collagen, which is gradually replaced by type I collagen (Lindsey et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). Therefore, and according to our findings, we believe that the neck region promoted a higher inflammatory reaction than the pinna, showing a significant increase in fibrotic tissue after 15 days of autotransplantation, confirmed by the increase in type I collagen and fibronectin and the reduction in type III collagen, as well as the loss of stromal cells in the region, as discussed earlier.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe analysis of stromal cell proliferation showed that the 7-day autotransplantation in the neck region had a higher number of PCNA-positive cells, but this number significantly reduced with 15 days of grafting compared with the control. Similarly, Scalercio et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e) also obtained an increase in stromal cell proliferation with seven days of subcutaneous autotransplantation of monkey ovarian tissue. However, this reduction in the proliferative potential in the region, with the passage of transplantation time, may have occurred due to the tissue damage that the region developed, such as the loss of stromal population since the first days of transplantation, more tissue fibrosis, provoked by the attempt to reconstruct the damage. Such facts may have affected or inhibited factors responsible for some of the signals that promote proliferation (Vogler et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e). In addition, our findings also show that the pinna region was similar to the control throughout transplantation, although, despite the decrease in cell proliferation within 15 days of transplantation, this rate was higher than the neck region. Unlike our findings, Terren et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) observed an increase in cell proliferation (by immunostaining with Ki67) and a decrease in fibrosis at 21 days compared to 3 days of cryopreserved whole ovary autotransplantation into the ear of mice. We believe that this difference may be related both to the use of the whole ovary in the study, which may present more coordinated functional responses than small fragments of the same organ in long-term transplant (Terazono et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012b\u003c/span\u003e; Gavish et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e; Lew \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e), as well as, to injuries and oxidative stress from ischemia-reperfusion, that are severe in transplanted ovarian fragments (Damous et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Cacciottola et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e), as already discussed earlier. However, despite that, the ear region showed a better response than the neck region.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn conclusion, this study showed that the pinna could be a potential region for autotransplantation of canine ovarian tissue because it manages to keep the survival of the fragment stable during the 15 days of autotransplantation. We observe this by maintaining morphologically normal follicles and by remodeling the extracellular matrix, through type I collagen and fibronectin. However, in both regions, there was no follicular development, and the density of stromal cells was reduced. Furthermore, although the neck showed a more significant proliferative potential of stromal cells in seven days, this region presented loss of stroma and proliferation within 15 days of autotransplantation, adding to a more significant deposition of tissue fibers when compared to the pinna. It is essential to highlight that this is the first comparative study of canine ovarian tissue autotransplantation between the pinna region and the neck. However, more research is needed to obtain better survival rates and follicular development. Like this, future proposals using antioxidant factors as a pre-treatment may promote adequate support in canine ovarian tissue autotransplantation. This study can contribute to pharmacological research and applications of autotransplantation in animal reproduction centers or zoos to preserve the fertility of precious domestic animals or endangered canine species, respectively.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Abbreviations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;HVSBC-UECE\u003c/strong\u003e: Veterinary Hospital Prof. Sylvio Barbosa Cardoso of the State University of Cear\u0026aacute;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMEM-HEPES\u003c/strong\u003e: Minimum Essential Medium-buffers\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOSH\u003c/strong\u003e: ovariosalpingohysterectomy\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePAF\u003c/strong\u003e: paraformaldehyde\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePCNA\u003c/strong\u003e: proliferating cell nuclear antigen\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTVT\u003c/strong\u003e: transmissible venereal tumor\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSEM\u003c/strong\u003e: Standard error of the mean\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgments\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors are grateful for the support of the State University of Cear\u0026aacute; (UECE), and collaborators Zoonosis Surveillance Unit (UVZ-Fortaleza/Brazil), Veterinary Hospital Prof. Sylvio Barbosa Cardoso of the State University of Cear\u0026aacute; (HVSBC-UECE), \u0026nbsp;Laboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Ovarian Pre-Antral Follicles (LAMOFOPA).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting Interests\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor Contributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe main experimental conception and design were created by Kele Amaral Alves.\u0026nbsp;All laboratory procedures and surgeries were carried out by [Fabiana Aparecida Santilli Brand\u0026atilde;o], [Danielle Cristina Calado de Brito], [Leda Maria Costa Pereira], [Lucy Vanessa Sulca \u0026Ntilde;aupas], [Samara Silva de Sousa], [Duanny Murinelly de Souza Cunha], and [Reginaldo Pereira de Sousa Filho]. Contributed reagents/materials: [Ana Paula Ribeiro Rodrigues] and [D\u0026aacute;rcio \u0026Iacute;talo Alves Teixeira].\u0026nbsp;Data collection, statistical analyses, and interpretation were performed by [Fabiana Aparecida Santilli Brand\u0026atilde;o], [Benner Geraldo Alves], [Kele Amaral Alves], and [Danielle Cristina Calado de Brito]. Manuscript writing and proofreading: [Fabiana Aparecida Santilli Brand\u0026atilde;o], [Danielle Cristina Calado de Brito], [Lucy Vanessa Sulca \u0026Ntilde;aupas], [Benner Geraldo Alves], and [Kele Amaral Alves]. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll animals were obtained from the Zoonoses Surveillance Unit of Fortaleza, in the State of Cear\u0026aacute;, Brazil, with approval and realization under the guidelines of the Ethics Committee for the Use of Animals of the State University of Cear\u0026aacute; (3349245/2018).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eConflict of Interest\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that would prejudice the impartiality of this scientific work.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData Availability\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable. All data supporting the findings of this study are included within the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAbe Y, Suwa Y, Asano T, Ueta YY, Kobayashi N, Ohshima N, Shirasuna S, Abdel-Ghani MA, Oi M, Kobayashi Y, Miyoshi M, Miyahara K, Suzuki H (2011) Cryopreservation of canine embryos. Biol Reprod 84:363-368. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.110.087312\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAerts JM, Oste M, Bols PE (2005) Development and practical applications of a method for repeated transvaginal, ultrasound-guided biopsy collection of the bovine ovary. Theriogenology 64:947-957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.01.011\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAlves KA, Alves BG, Gastal GDA, Tarso SGS, Gastal MO, Figueiredo JR, Gambarini ML, Gastal EL (2016) The mare model to study the effects of ovarian dynamics on preantral follicle features. PLoS One 11:e0149693. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149693\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAlves KA, Alves BG, Rocha CD, Visonn\u0026aacute; M, Mohallem RF, Gastal MO, Jacomini JO, Beletti ME, Figueiredo JR, Gambarini ML, Gastal EL (2015) Number and density of equine preantral follicles in different ovarian histological section thicknesses. Theriogenology 83:1048-1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.12.004\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBarnes JL, Gorin Y (2011) Myofibroblast Differentiation During Fibrosis: Role of NAD(P)H Oxidases. Kidney Int 79:944-956. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2010.516\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBochner F, Fellus-Alyagor L, Kalchenko V, Shinar S, Neeman M (2015) A Novel Intravital Imaging Window for Longitudinal Microscopy of the Mouse Ovary. Sci Rep 5:12446. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12446\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBordes A, Lornage J, Demirci B, Franck M, Courbiere B, Guerin JF, Salle B (2005) Normal gestations and live births after orthotopic autograft of vitrified\u0026ndash;warmed hemi-ovaries into ewes. Hum Reprod 20:2745-2748. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei155\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBrand\u0026atilde;o FAS, Alves BG, Alves KA, Souza SS, Silva YP, Freitas VJF, Teixeira DIA, Gastal EL (2018) Laparoscopic ovarian biopsy pick-up method for goats. Theriogenology 107:219-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.10.042\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBrito DCC, \u0026Ntilde;aupas LVS, Souza SS, Alc\u0026acirc;ntara GLH, Figueiredo JR, Santos RR, Rodrigues APR (2021) Interference of fixatives and fixation period on the morphologic analysis of ovarian preantral follicles. Zygote 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199421000198.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBroughton G, Janis JE, Attinger CE (2006) The basic science of wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:12S-34S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000225430.42531.c2\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCacciottola L, Manavella DD, Amorim CA, Donnez J, Dolmans MM (2018) \u003cem\u003eIn vivo\u003c/em\u003e characterization of metabolic activity and oxidative stress in grafted human ovarian tissue using microdialysis. Fertil Steril 110:534-544.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.009 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCallejo J, Vilaseca S, Ordi J, Cabr\u0026eacute; S, Lailla JM, Balasch J (2002) Heterotopic ovarian transplantation without vascular pedicle in syngeneic Lewis rats: long-term evaluation of effects on ovarian structure and function. Fertil Steril 77:396-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02970-3\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCampos-Junior PH, Alves TJ , Dias MT, Assun\u0026ccedil;ao CM, Munk M, Mattos MS, Kraemer LR, Almeida BG, Russo RC, Barcelos L, Camargo LSA, Viana JHM (2016) Ovarian Grafts 10 Days after Xenotransplantation: Folliculogenesis and Recovery of Viable Oocytes. PLoS One 11:e0158109. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158109\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCao H, Lin W (2019) A Systematic Study on Reproductive Endocrine Function Recovery From Subcutaneous Ovarian Autotransplantation in Mice After 2 Weeks. Transplant Proc 51:2099-2107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.04.023\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCosta MM, Gon\u0026ccedil;alves LP, Lemos MS, Marangon ARM, Lucci CM (2020) Investigation on revascularization time and initial damage after transplantation of fresh and cryopreserved ovarian tissue in domestic cats. Cell Tissue Bank 21:303-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-020-09823-6\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDamous LL, Nakamuta JS, Carvalho AES (2015) Scaffold‐based delivery of adipose tissue‐derived stem cells in rat frozen‐thawed ovarian autografts: preliminary studies in a rat model. J Assist Reprod Genet 328:1285-1294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0527-x\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDegner DA, Walshaw R, Fowler JD, Lanz OI, Ocello P, Maier J, Blaezer L, Smith RJ (2004) Surgical approaches to recipient vessels of the head and neck for microvascular free tissue transfer in dogs. Vet Surg 33:200-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2004.04030.x\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDonfack NJ, Alves KA, Alves BG, Rocha RMP, Bruno JB, Lima LF, Lobo CH , Santos RR, Domingues SFS, Bertolini M, Smitz J, Rodrigues APR (2018) \u003cem\u003eIn vivo\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e strategies to support caprine preantral follicle development after ovarian tissue vitrification. Reprod Fertil Dev 30:1055-1065. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD17315\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDonfack NJ, Alves KA, Ara\u0026uacute;jo VR, Cordova A, Figueiredo JR, Smitz J, and Rodrigues APR (2017) Expectations and limitations of ovarian tissue transplantation. Zygote 25:391-403. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199417000338\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDonnez J, Dolmans MM (2014) Transplantation of ovarian tissue. Best Pract Res Clin Obstetrics Gynaecol 28:1188-1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.09.003\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEvans D (1971) A note on the surgical anatomy of the omocervical artery in the dog. Can Anaesth Soc J 18:230-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03025455\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFransolet M, Labied S, Henry L, Masereel MC, Rozet E, Kirschvink N, Nisolle M, and Munaut C (2014) Strategies for using the sheep ovarian cortex as a model in reproductive medicine. PLoS One 9:e91073. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091073\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGanguly B Das U, Das AK. Canine transmissible venereal tumour: a review (2016) Vet Comp Oncol 14:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/vco.12060\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGavish Z, Peer G, Roness H, Cohen Y, Meirow D (2014) Follicle activation and \u0026lsquo;burn-out\u0026rsquo; contribute to post-transplantation follicle loss in ovarian tissue grafts: the effect of graft thickness. Hum Reprod 29:989\u0026ndash;996. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu015\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHariya M, and Suzuki H (2016). Incidence of apoptotic cells after vitrification in canine ovarian tissues. J Mamm Ova Res 33:69-75. https://doi.org/10.1274/jmor.33.69\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHoekman EJ, Louwe LA , Rooijers M, van der Westerlaken LAJ, Klijn NF, Pilgram GSK, de Kroon CD, and Hilders CGJM (2020) Ovarian tissue cryopreservation: Low usage rates and high live‐birth rate after transplantation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 99:213-221. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13735\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIUCN (2021) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, https://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 20 July 2021\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJohnson AEM, Freeman EW, Colgin M, McDonough C, and Songsansen N (2014) Induction of ovarian activity and ovulation in an induced ovulator, the maned wolf (\u003cem\u003eChrysocyon brachyurus\u003c/em\u003e), using GnRH agonist and recombinant LH. Theriogenology 82:71-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.03.009\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJunqueira L, Cossermelli W, and Brentani R (1978) Differential staining of collagens type I, II and III by Sirius red and polarization microscopy. Arch Histol Japon 41:267-274. https://doi.org/10.1679/aohc1950.41.267\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKalogeris T, Baines CP, Krenz M, and Korthuis RJ (2012) Cell biology of ischemia/reperfusion injury. Int Rev Cel Mol Bio 298:229-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394309-5.00006-7\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKim SS, Yang HW, Kang HG, Lee HH, Lee HC, Ko DS, and Gosden RG (2004) Quantitative assessment of ischemic tissue damage in ovarian cortical tissue with or without antioxidant (ascorbic acid) treatment. Fertil Steril 82:679-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.05.022\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKhoram H, Najafpour A, Razi M (2011) Follicular Viability and Histological Alterations after Auto-transplantation of Dog Ovaries by Experimentally Inducing Blood Sinus on Stomach. Int J Fertil Steril. 5:27\u0026ndash;34. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4040240/\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLee DM, Yeoman RR, Battaglia DE, Stouffer RL, Zelinski-Wooten MB, Fanton JW, Lobo DP (2004) Live birth after ovarian tissue transplant. Nature 428:137-138. https://doi.org/10.1038/428137a\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLee SH, Oh HJ, Kim MJ, Kim GA, Setyawan EMN, Ra K, Abdillah DA, Lee BC (2018) Dog cloning-no longer science fiction. Reprod Domest Anim 53:133-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13358\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLeonel ECR, Vilela JMV, Paiva REG, Jivago JLPR, Amaral RS, Lucci CM (2018) Restoration of fresh cat ovarian tissue function by autografting to subcutaneous tissue: A pilot study. Theriogenology 105:97-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.09.016\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLew R (2019) Natural history of ovarian function including assessment of ovarian reserve and premature ovarian failure. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet 55:2-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.05.005\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLi F, Tao Y, Zhang Y, Li Y, Fang F, Liu Y, H Cao, Zhang X, Zhou S (2010) Follicle growth and oocyte development after ovary transplantation into back muscle of immune-intact adult castrated male mice. Reproduction 140:465-476. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-10-0076\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLindsey ML, Iyer RP, Zamilpa R, Yabluchanskiy A, DeLeon-Pennell KY, Hall ME, Kaplan A, Zouein FA, Bratton D, Flynn ER, Cannon PL, Tian Y, Jin Y-F, Lange RA, Tokmina-Roszyk D, Fields GB, Br\u0026aacute;s LE de C (2015) A Novel Collagen Matricryptin Reduces Left Ventricular Dilation Post-myocardial Infarction by Promoting Scar Formation and Angiogenesis. J Am Coll Cardiol 66:1364-1374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.035\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOktay K, Turk\u0026ccedil;uoglu I, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA (2011) Four spontaneous pregnancies and three live births following subcutaneous transplantation of frozen banked ovarian tissue: what is the explanation? Fertil Steril 95:7-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.07.1072\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOrozco MM, Ceballos LA, Pino M de la C, G\u0026uuml;rtler RE (2014) Local threats and potential infectious hazards to maned wolves (\u003cem\u003eChrysocyon brachyurus\u003c/em\u003e) in the southeastern Argentine Chaco. Mammalia 78:339-349. https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2013-0067\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePaz RCR (2015) Assisted reproduction in neotropical canidae and Procyonidae. Rev Bras Reprod Anim 39:77-82. http://www.cbra.org.br/pages/publicacoes/rbra/v39n1/pag77-82%20(RB539).pdf. Accessed 26 July 2021\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePinto Y, Alves KA, Alves BG, Souza SS, Brand\u0026atilde;o FAS, Lima LF, Vicente JFF, Ana PRR, Jos\u0026eacute; RF, Eduardo LG, Teixeira DIA (2020) Heterotopic ovarian allotransplantation in goats: Preantral follicle viability and tissue remodeling. Anim Reprod Sci 215:106310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106310\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eScalercio SR, Amorim CA, Brito DC, Perc\u0026aacute;rio S, Oskam IC, Domingues SFS, Santos RR (2015) Trolox enhances follicular survival after ovarian tissue autograft in squirrel monkey (\u003cem\u003eSaimiri collinsi\u003c/em\u003e). Reprod Fertil Dev 28:1854-1864. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD14454.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSchmidt KL, Byskov AG, Andersen NA, Muller J, Andersen YC (2003) Density and distribution of primordial follicles in single pieces of cortex from 21 patients and in individual pieces of cortex from three entire human ovaries. Hum Reprod 18:1158-1164. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg246\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShi F, Harman J, Fujiwara K, Sottile J (2010) Collagen I matrix turnover is regulated by fibronectin polymerization. Am J Physiol - Cell Physiol 298:C1265-C1275. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00341.2009\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSilva JRV, Ferreira MAL, Costa SHF, Santos RR, Carvalho FCA, Rodrigues APR, Lucci CM, B\u0026aacute;o SN, Figueiredo JR (2002) Degeneration rate of preantral follicles in the ovaries of goats. Small Rum Res 43:203-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(02)00017-2\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSlegtenhorst BR, Dor FJMF, Rodriguez H, Voskuil FJ, Tullius SG (2014) Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury and its Consequences on Immunity and Inflammation. Curr Transpl Rep 1:147-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40472-014-0017-6\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSoleimani R, Heytens E, Oktay K (2011) Enhancement of Neoangiogenesis and Follicle Survival by Sphingosine-1-Phosphate in Human Ovarian Tissue Xenotransplants. PLoS One 6:e19475. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019475\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSouza SS, Alves BG, Alves KA, Brand\u0026atilde;o FAS, Brito DCC, Gastal MO, Rodrigues APR, Figueiredo JR, Teixeira DIA, Gastal EL (2020) Heterotopic autotransplantation of ovarian tissue in a large animal model: Effects of cooling and VEGF. PLoS One 15: e0241442. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241442\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTammiste T, Kask K, Padrik P, Idla K, Rosenstein K, Jatsenko T, Veerus P, Salumets A (2019) A case report and follow-up of the first live birth after heterotopic transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in Eastern Europe. BMC Womens Health 19:65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0764-8\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTerazono T, Inoue M, Kaedei Y, Tanihara F, Namula Z, Viet VL, Taura Y, Takagi M, Takuma T, Otoi T (2012a) Assessment of canine ovaries autografted to various body sites. Theriogenology 77:131-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.07.026\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTerazono T, Kaedei Y, Tanihara F, Namula Z, Viet V, Takagi M, Inoue M, Sato Y, Taniguchi M, Otoi T (2012b) Follicle formation in the canine ovary after autografting to a peripheral site. Reprod Domest Anim. 47:e16-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01880.x\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTerren C, Bindels J, Nisolle M, No\u0026euml;l A, Munaut C (2022) Evaluation of an alternative heterotopic transplantation model for ovarian tissue to test pharmaceuticals improvements for fertility restoration. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 20:35. https://rbej.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12958-022-00910-9\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVan Eyck AS, Bouzin C, Feron O, Romeu L, Van Langendonckt A, Donnez J, Dolmans MM (2010) Both host and graft vessels contribute to revascularization of xenografted human ovarian tissue in a murine model. Fertil Steril 93:1676-1685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.048\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVilela JMV, Leonel ECR, Gon\u0026ccedil;alves LP, Paiva REG, Amaral RS, Amorim CA, Lucci CM (2019) Function of Cryopreserved Cat Ovarian Tissue after Autotransplantation. Animals 1065:1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9121065\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVogler R, Sauer B, Kim DS, Sch\u0026auml;fer-Korting M, Kleuser B (2003) Sphingosine-1-phosphate and its potentially paradoxical effects on critical parameters of cutaneous wound healing. J Invest Dermatol 120:693-700. https://www.jidonline.org/article/S0022-202X(15)30206-2/fulltext\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWakasa I, Hayashi M, Abe Y, Suzuki H (2017) Distribution of follicles in canine ovarian tissues and xenotransplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissues with even distribution of follicles. Reprod Domest Anim 52:219-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12857\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWebb R, Buratini J, Hernandez-Medrano JH, Gutierrez CG, Campbell BK (2016) Follicle development and selection: past, present and future. Anim Reprod 13;234-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.21451/1984-3143-AR883\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWiedemann C, Hribal R, Ringleb J, Bertelsen MF, Rasmusen K, Andersen CY, Kristensen SG, Jewgenow K (2012) Preservation of primordial follicles from lions by slow freezing and xenotransplantation of ovarian cortex into an immunodeficient mouse. Reprod Domest Anim 47:300-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12081\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWiweko B, Soebijanto S, Boediono A, Mansyur M, Siregar NC, Suryandari DA, Aulia A, Djuwantono T, Affandi B (2019) Survival of isolated human preantral follicles after vitrification: Analyses of morphology and Fas ligand and caspase-3 mRNA expression. Clin Exp Reprod Med 46:152-165. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2019.00143\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYoum HW, Lee JR, Lee J, Jee BC, Suh SC, Kim SH (2015) Transplantation of mouse ovarian tissue: Comparison of the transplantation sites. Theriogenology 83:854-861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.11.026\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZhou F, Shi LB, Zhang SY (2017) Ovarian fibrosis: A phenomenon of concern. Chin Med J (Engl) 130:365-371. https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.198931\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"veterinary-research-communications","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"verc","sideBox":"Learn more about [Veterinary Research Communications](https://www.springer.com/journal/11259)","snPcode":"11259","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/11259/3","title":"Veterinary Research Communications","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"Preantral follicles, Collagen fibers, Pinna, Neck, Autograft, Dog","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2564726/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2564726/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eOvarian tissue transplantation makes it possible to restore fertility; however, the success of this technique depends on the transplant region used. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of two subcutaneous regions on canine ovarian transplantation, pinna (Pi) and neck (Ne), for 7 and 15 days. Ovaries collected by ovariosalpingohysterectomy were fragmented using a punch device. Fresh fragments were fixed, and the others were immediately grafted onto the animal itself in the Pi and Ne regions for 7 and 15 days. Recovered fragments were evaluated for histology (morphology, development and stromal density), picrosirius (collagen fibers), and immunohistochemistry (fibrosis and cell proliferation). The results showed that follicular normality rates were lower in Pi-7 (78%) \u003cem\u003evs.\u003c/em\u003e control (90%) and Pi-15 (86%), similar in Ne-7 (92%) and superior in Ne-15 (97%) compared to the control, with the effect of the region Ne (94%) superior (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) to Pi (82%). Stromal density reduced in both regions \u003cem\u003evs\u003c/em\u003e. control but was similar within 15 days. Fragments from both regions showed higher fibronectin labeling and deposition of type I and lower type III collagen fibers (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) \u003cem\u003evs\u003c/em\u003e. control. Proliferation rates in Ne-7 were higher (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) than in control, and Pi-15 was higher (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) than Ne-15. In conclusion, the pinna can be a potential region for canine ovarian tissue autotransplantation than the neck region in 15 days.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Effects of different subcutaneous sites on heterotopic autotransplantation of canine ovarian tissue","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2023-02-10 22:30:58","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2564726/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Major revision","date":"2023-04-24T19:37:43+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2023-02-21T20:04:00+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"33dea5c6-d16a-4dc0-8fd5-ce430d584baa","date":"2023-02-16T08:10:46+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2023-02-15T22:49:12+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2023-02-08T23:39:20+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2023-02-08T23:39:19+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Veterinary Research Communications","date":"2023-02-08T13:14:25+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"veterinary-research-communications","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"verc","sideBox":"Learn more about [Veterinary Research Communications](https://www.springer.com/journal/11259)","snPcode":"11259","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/11259/3","title":"Veterinary Research Communications","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"1f5752bd-c603-464a-b4e9-d322108908ba","owner":[],"postedDate":"February 10th, 2023","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2023-10-16T21:00:48+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-2564726","link":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-023-10139-5","journal":{"identity":"veterinary-research-communications","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Veterinary Research Communications"},"publishedOn":"2023-05-18 20:53:26","publishedOnDateReadable":"May 18th, 2023"},"versionCreatedAt":"2023-02-10 22:30:58","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1007/s11259-023-10139-5","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-023-10139-5","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-2564726","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-2564726","identity":"rs-2564726","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"oE6Zbj460LM0Up2FdVbMZ","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}