Pangenome References Improve Biomarker Estimation from Tumor Sequencing Data

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

It has recently been shown that patients from non-European ancestries are at a higher risk of inappropriate clinical intervention because of inaccurate biomarker estimation, arising from the reference bias inherent in standard methods for determining the tumor genome from sequencing data. Here we demonstrate that these inaccuracies can be reduced by using a pangenome reference appropriate for the patient’s population. We constructed a novel secondary analysis workflow where the pangenome reference serves as a scaffold for mapping the sequencing reads, and is also included in the relevant ‘panel of normals’ needed to discriminate between germline and somatic mutations in tumor-only sequencing. This approach detects known somatic mutations in tumor-only sequencing more accurately than the standard GATK somatic calling workflow, prevalent in diagnostic settings for analysis of sequencing data from tumor-only assays, on a standard benchmark tumor sample, HCC1395 (33% relative increase in F1 score). We also assessed the expected clinical impact of our approach by comparing the Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) calculated from missense somatic mutations called in tumor/normal samples from 6 patients self-reported as belonging to African, 1 to Asian and 3 to European populations respectively. We find that the TMB values calculated from the tumor-only sequencing data analyzed by our workflow more closely approximate the TMB values calculated from the tumor-normal analysis of the same sample, being 35% higher on average, whereas GATK tumor-only analysis generates TMB values 56% higher on average than the tumor-normal analysis of the same sample. Tumor-normal TMB values calculated by the two methods do not vary as drastically, GATK generated values being 13% higher on average, indicating that GATK tumor-only analysis leads to significant overestimation of TMB values, which can be largely corrected by using our workflow when tumor-normal sequencing is not available. These results indicate that pangenome based analysis has the potential to become the new standard for unbiased processing of somatic sequencing samples, following on from its increased adoption for germline sequencing analysis.
Full text 2,370 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract It has recently been shown that patients from non-European ancestries are at a higher risk of inappropriate clinical intervention because of inaccurate biomarker estimation, arising from the reference bias inherent in standard methods for determining the tumor genome from sequencing data. Here we demonstrate that these inaccuracies can be reduced by using a pangenome reference appropriate for the patient’s population. We constructed a novel secondary analysis workflow where the pangenome reference serves as a scaffold for mapping the sequencing reads, and is also included in the relevant ‘panel of normals’ needed to discriminate between germline and somatic mutations in tumor-only sequencing. This approach detects known somatic mutations in tumor-only sequencing more accurately than the standard GATK somatic calling workflow, prevalent in diagnostic settings for analysis of sequencing data from tumor-only assays, on a standard benchmark tumor sample, HCC1395 (33% relative increase in F1 score). We also assessed the expected clinical impact of our approach by comparing the Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) calculated from missense somatic mutations called in tumor/normal samples from 6 patients self-reported as belonging to African, 1 to Asian and 3 to European populations respectively. We find that the TMB values calculated from the tumor-only sequencing data analyzed by our workflow more closely approximate the TMB values calculated from the tumor-normal analysis of the same sample, being 35% higher on average, whereas GATK tumor-only analysis generates TMB values 56% higher on average than the tumor-normal analysis of the same sample. Tumor-normal TMB values calculated by the two methods do not vary as drastically, GATK generated values being 13% higher on average, indicating that GATK tumor-only analysis leads to significant overestimation of TMB values, which can be largely corrected by using our workflow when tumor-normal sequencing is not available. These results indicate that pangenome based analysis has the potential to become the new standard for unbiased processing of somatic sequencing samples, following on from its increased adoption for germline sequencing analysis. Competing Interest Statement All authors were employed by Velsera Inc while performing this study Footnotes Contact: jack.digiovanna{at}velsera.com

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00