Reply: Performance indicators in ART: time for a reappraisal?

Veljko Vlaisavljević, Kelly Tilleman
In: Human Reproduction Open · 2022 · vol. 2022(1) , pp. hoab045 · doi:10.1093/hropen/hoab045 · PMID:35079637 · W4205173319
letter OA: gold CC0
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This letter discusses the need to re-evaluate current performance indicators used in assisted reproductive technology (ART) to better reflect clinical practice and outcomes.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

References (3)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK