Serial dependence in the perception of proportion

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The influence of previously encountered stimuli on subsequent perceptual judgments is termed serial dependence. Serial dependence has been robustly demonstrated across a broad spectrum of visual features, ranging from low-level attributes, such as orientation and color, to high-level representations, including facial identity. To further understand this dependency, the present study investigated the presence of serial dependence in judgments of relative proportions within visual stimuli. Participants completed a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) task involving stimuli composed of two symbols. These symbols differed only in brightness in Experiment 1 and only in shape in Experiment 2. Participants were required to judge which symbol occupied the larger proportion. The results revealed a systematic bias in the participants’ responses. Specifically, Experiment 1 yielded a repulsive bias (negative serial dependence), where current judgments shifted away from the proportion observed in the preceding trial. Conversely, Experiment 2 exhibited an attractive bias (positive serial dependence), pulling current judgments toward the preceding proportion. Furthermore, the magnitude and direction of this serial dependence appeared to be modulated by both the participants’ confidence in their judgments and the feature similarity between successive stimuli. These findings suggest that the perception of proportion has serial dependence and extend the generality of this phenomenon to higher-level visual summary statistics.
Full text 1,711 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The influence of previously encountered stimuli on subsequent perceptual judgments is termed serial dependence. Serial dependence has been robustly demonstrated across a broad spectrum of visual features, ranging from low-level attributes, such as orientation and color, to high-level representations, including facial identity. To further understand this dependency, the present study investigated the presence of serial dependence in judgments of relative proportions within visual stimuli. Participants completed a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) task involving stimuli composed of two symbols. These symbols differed only in brightness in Experiment 1 and only in shape in Experiment 2. Participants were required to judge which symbol occupied the larger proportion. The results revealed a systematic bias in the participants’ responses. Specifically, Experiment 1 yielded a repulsive bias (negative serial dependence), where current judgments shifted away from the proportion observed in the preceding trial. Conversely, Experiment 2 exhibited an attractive bias (positive serial dependence), pulling current judgments toward the preceding proportion. Furthermore, the magnitude and direction of this serial dependence appeared to be modulated by both the participants’ confidence in their judgments and the feature similarity between successive stimuli. These findings suggest that the perception of proportion has serial dependence and extend the generality of this phenomenon to higher-level visual summary statistics. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Email: ytanaka{at}comm.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp Email: higashi{at}comm.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00