Abstract
Despite the widespread use of adenovirus, mRNA, and protein-based vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic, their relative immunological profiles and protective efficacies remain incompletely defined. Here, we compared antigen kinetics, innate and adaptive immune responses, and protective efficacy following Ad5, mRNA, and protein vaccination in mice. Ad5 induced the most sustained antigen expression, but mRNA induced the most potent interferon responses, associated with robust antigen presentation and costimulation. Unlike Ad5 vaccines, which were hindered by pre-existing vector immunity, mRNA vaccines retained efficacy after repeated use. As a single-dose regimen, Ad5 vaccines elicited superior immune responses. However, as a prime-boost regimen, and particularly in Ad5 seropositive mice, mRNA vaccines outperformed the other vaccine platforms. These findings highlight strengths of each vaccine platform and underscore the importance of host serostatus in determining optimal vaccine performance.
Full text
1,093 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
Despite the widespread use of adenovirus, mRNA, and protein-based vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic, their relative immunological profiles and protective efficacies remain incompletely defined. Here, we compared antigen kinetics, innate and adaptive immune responses, and protective efficacy following Ad5, mRNA, and protein vaccination in mice. Ad5 induced the most sustained antigen expression, but mRNA induced the most potent interferon responses, associated with robust antigen presentation and costimulation. Unlike Ad5 vaccines, which were hindered by pre-existing vector immunity, mRNA vaccines retained efficacy after repeated use. As a single-dose regimen, Ad5 vaccines elicited superior immune responses. However, as a prime-boost regimen, and particularly in Ad5 seropositive mice, mRNA vaccines outperformed the other vaccine platforms. These findings highlight strengths of each vaccine platform and underscore the importance of host serostatus in determining optimal vaccine performance.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.