Pulmonary scar cancer. A pathologic reappraisal.

OA: closed
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-02

This study reevaluates pulmonary scar cancer, finding that the characteristic pleural puckering and pigmentation result from localized atelectasis rather than preformed fibrous tissue, rendering the term inappropriate.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-02 · read from full text

This study reevaluates the pathological basis of pulmonary scar cancer by analyzing 49 lung cancer specimens from patients aged 40 to 74. The researchers identified that tumors exhibiting classic scar features, such as pleural puckering and central pigmentation, were primarily peripheral adenocarcinomas or squamous cell carcinomas. Elastic staining revealed that these appearances resulted from localized atelectasis caused by small airway obstruction rather than pre-existing fibrous tissue or desmoplastic reactions. The authors conclude that the term "scar cancer" is inappropriate because no significant fibrosis was present, and any association with tuberculosis was incidental. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

A total of 49 consecutive specimens of lung cancer were collected prospectively at surgical resection or autopsy from 40 men and nine women, aged 40-74 years. Of the 49 tumors, the gross appearance of 22 fitted the description of a scar cancer, i.e., a tumor with pleural puckering and central pigmentation. Nineteen of the "scar cancers" were peripheral (17 adenocarcinomas and two squamous cell carcinomas); three were central (one squamous cell carcinoma and two adenocarcinomas). In the 19 peripheral "scar cancers," elastic stains demonstrated the presence of collapsed, unfibrosed lung tissue at the center with traction of the overlying pleura toward it. Elsewhere in the tumor, the elastic framework was either destroyed or expanded by tumor filling the alveolar spaces. None of the "scar cancers" had a significant desmoplastic reaction that might otherwise explain the scarred appearance. It appeared that local atelectasis was solely responsible for the pleural puckering and central pigmentation. On the other hand, atelectatic lung tissue was not seen in the 27 cancers that did not have the appearance of a scar cancer. Tuberculosis was found in 10 of the 49 lung specimens. In only one specimen was the tuberculous lesion anatomically associated with the tumor. There was no evidence of pulmonary infarct in any of the specimens. The term "scar cancer" was considered inappropriate as there was no preformed fibrous tissue. The scarred appearance was thought to be the result of localized pulmonary atelectasis owing to small airways obstruction by tumor. Association with tuberculosis was considered incidental.
Full text 1,795 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Pulmonary scar cancer A pathologic reappraisal - Ignatius Tak Min Kung - Irene Oi Lin Lui - Shee Loong Loke - M. Aung Khin - Che Keung Mok - Wah Kit Lam - Shun Yang So A total of 49 consecutive specimens of lung cancer were collected prospectively at surgical resection or autopsy from 40 men and nine women, aged 40–74 years. Of the 49 tumors, the gross appearance of 22 fitted the description of a scar cancer, i.e., a tumor with pleural puckering and central pigmentation. Nineteen of the “scar cancers” were peripheral (17 adenocarcinomas and two squamous cell carcinomas); three were central (one squamous cell carcinoma and two adenocarcinomas). In the 19 peripheral “scar cancers,” elastic stains demonstrated the presence of collapsed, unfibrosed lung tissue at the center with traction of the overlying pleura toward it. Elsewhere in the tumor, the elastic framework was either destroyed or expanded by tumor filling the alveolar spaces. None of the “scar cancers” had a significant desmoplastic reaction that might otherwise explain the scarred appearance. It appeared that local atelectasis was solely responsible for the pleural puckering and central pigmentation. On the other hand, atelectatic lung tissue was not seen in the 27 cancers that did not have the appearance of a scar cancer. Tuberculosis was found in 10 of the 49 lung specimens. In only one specimen was the tuberculous lesion anatomically associated with the tumor. There was no evidence of pulmonary infarct in any of the specimens. The term “scar cancer” was considered inappropriate as there was no preformed fibrous tissue. The scarred appearance was thought to be the result of localized pulmonary atelectasis owing to small airways obstruction by tumor. Association with tuberculosis was considered incidental.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-13T09:25:22.628771+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-16T06:28:21.314993+00:00