Beyond sex differences in mean: meta-analysis of differences in skewness, kurtosis, and correlation

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Biological differences between males and females are pervasive. Researchers often focus on sex differences in mean or, occasionally, in variation, albeit other measures can be useful for biomedical and biological research. For instance, differences in skewness (asymmetry of a distribution), kurtosis (heaviness of a distribution’s tails), and correlation (relationship between two variables) might be crucial to improve medical diagnosis and to understand natural processes. Yet, there are currently no meta-analytic ways to measure differences in these metrics between two groups while accounting for sampling error. We propose three effect size statistics to fill this gap: Δsk, Δku, and ΔZr, which measure differences in skewness, kurtosis, and correlation, respectively. Besides presenting the rationale for the calculation of these effect size statistics, we illustrate their potential using a large dataset of mice traits. For example, we found that females show, on average, greater skewness and kurtosis than males in both fat mass and heart weight. Although calculating Δsk, Δku, and ΔZr may require large sample sizes of individual data, technological advancements in data collection create increasing opportunities to use these effect size statistics. Importantly, Δsk, Δku, and ΔZr can be used to compare any two groups, allowing a new generation of meta-analyses that explore such differences and potentially leading to new insights in multiple fields of study.
Full text 2,143 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Biological differences between males and females are pervasive. Researchers often focus on sex differences in the mean or, occasionally, in variation, albeit other measures can be useful for biomedical and biological research. For instance, differences in skewness (asymmetry of a distribution), kurtosis (heaviness of a distribution’s tails), and correlation (relationship between two variables) might be crucial to improve medical diagnosis and to understand natural processes. Yet, there are currently no meta-analytic ways to measure differences in these metrics between two groups. We propose three effect size statistics to fill this gap: Δsk, Δku, and ΔZr, which measure differences in skewness, kurtosis, and correlation, respectively. Besides presenting the rationale for the calculation of these effect size statistics, we conducted a simulation to explore their properties and used a large dataset of mice traits to illustrate their potential. For example, in our case study, we found that females show, on average, a greater correlation between fat mass and heart weight than males. Although calculating Δsk, Δku, and ΔZr will require large sample sizes of individual data, technological advancements in data collection create increase opportunities to use these effect size statistics. Importantly, Δsk, Δku, and ΔZr can be used to compare any two groups, allowing a new generation of meta-analyses that explore such differences and potentially leading to new insights in multiple fields of study. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X20K9W Subjects Ecology and Evolutionary Biology

Keywords

covariance, individual participant meta-analysis, meta-regression, nonnormality, normal distribution, sex characteristics Dates Published: 2025-03-29 06:08 Last Updated: 2026-02-24 05:14 Older Versions License CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Additional Metadata Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: All data and code used in this study are available at: https://github.com/pietropollo/new_effect_size_statistics. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00