Echo-planar imaging-based time-of-flight imaging using a modified interleaved flyback trajectory

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Purpose A modified interleaved flyback (miFB) approach is introduced, designed to mitigate flow artifacts caused by alternating readout polarities in Echo Planar Imaging (EPI), while preserving acquisition efficiency. Methods We propose reconstructing odd and even echoes of 3D-EPI separately. To this end, the respective missing lines are acquired in interleaved shots with inverted polarity and an additional precursor gradient. Thereby, high scan efficiency is maintained compared to unsampled flyback gradients. Our miFB approach is additionally combined with gradient moment smoothing and compared to the interleaved dual-echo with acceleration (IDEA) method in phantom and in vivo scans at 7 Tesla. Results Our results demonstrate a significant reduction in ghosting and signal dropout using the miFB approach, yielding comparable image quality to non-EPI acquisitions while reducing acquisition time by approximately half. Conclusion The miFB approach offers a substantial reduction in flow artifacts, allowing for decreased acquisition times in TOF-MRA.
Full text 2,708 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose A modified interleaved flyback (miFB) approach is introduced, designed to mitigate flow artifacts caused by alternating readout polarities in Echo Planar Imaging (EPI), while preserving acquisition efficiency.

Methods

We propose reconstructing odd and even echoes of 3D-EPI separately. To this end, the respective missing lines are acquired in interleaved shots with inverted polarity and an additional precursor gradient. Thereby, high scan efficiency is maintained compared to unsampled flyback gradients. Our miFB approach is additionally combined with gradient moment smoothing and compared to the interleaved dual-echo with acceleration (IDEA) method in phantom and in vivo scans at 7 Tesla.

Results

Our results demonstrate a significant reduction in ghosting and signal dropout using the miFB approach, yielding comparable image quality to non-EPI acquisitions while reducing acquisition time by approximately half.

Conclusion

The miFB approach offers a substantial reduction in flow artifacts, allowing for decreased acquisition times in TOF-MRA. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funding Statement This work received financial support from Helmholtz Association Initiative and Networking Fund, funding code ZT-IPF- 4-042 (Helmholtz Imaging Project HighLine). Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: Ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Bonn gave ethical approval for this work. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00