Assisted Reproductive Technology: Techniques and Limitations
This review of assisted reproductive technology identifies endometriosis as a common indication for treatment while highlighting limitations such as high costs, invasive procedures, and modest pregnancy rates.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This review examines the techniques and limitations of assisted reproductive technology, highlighting that infertility affects one in six couples with ten percent requiring medical intervention. The authors identify bilateral tubal block and endometriosis as primary indications for treatments such as in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, noting that these procedures involve invasive oocyte collection and superovulation risks. While average pregnancy rates remain between thirty and thirty-four percent globally, the text acknowledges higher abortion and congenital anomaly rates linked to maternal age rather than the procedure itself, alongside barriers like cost and social stigma. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,209 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (15)
- W187872766 via openalex
- W206242701 via openalex
- W2110615303 via openalex
- W2121960403 via openalex
- W2167738139 via openalex
- W2282417966 via openalex
- W2282666121 via openalex
- W2283892449 via openalex
- W2419064615 via openalex
- W3025628770 via openalex
- W4236576430 via openalex
- W4243692338 via openalex
- W4248635984 via openalex
- W4255749972 via openalex
- W6700533340 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00