Application of Anti-Stigma Design Heuristics for Usability Inspection
This study developed and applied anti-stigma design heuristics alongside traditional heuristics to evaluate a health website, identifying usability problems and leading to design changes that might have otherwise been missed.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
The paper describes how existing health-care usability heuristics often miss stigma-related factors, and it proposes anti-stigma design heuristics to evaluate stigmatization in health care websites. Using both a heuristic evaluation and a cognitive walkthrough, the authors applied an extended set of heuristics to an endometriosis and sexual pain website, completing 5 tasks with 21 actions and identifying 26 usability problems, alongside redesign recommendations delivered before end-user testing. The authors report that anti-stigma heuristics received worse ratings than traditional heuristics, and that the resulting design changes might otherwise have been overlooked. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it evaluates an endometriosis and sexual pain website using anti-stigma design heuristics to surface usability and stigma-related issues.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,049 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:24:08.918168+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine