Application of Anti-Stigma Design Heuristics for Usability Inspection

other OA: hybrid CC-BY-NC-4.0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09

This study developed and applied anti-stigma design heuristics alongside traditional heuristics to evaluate a health website, identifying usability problems and leading to design changes that might have otherwise been missed.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 · read from full text

The paper describes how existing health-care usability heuristics often miss stigma-related factors, and it proposes anti-stigma design heuristics to evaluate stigmatization in health care websites. Using both a heuristic evaluation and a cognitive walkthrough, the authors applied an extended set of heuristics to an endometriosis and sexual pain website, completing 5 tasks with 21 actions and identifying 26 usability problems, alongside redesign recommendations delivered before end-user testing. The authors report that anti-stigma heuristics received worse ratings than traditional heuristics, and that the resulting design changes might otherwise have been overlooked. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it evaluates an endometriosis and sexual pain website using anti-stigma design heuristics to surface usability and stigma-related issues.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

User interface evaluation has become important in developing usable health care technologies. Although usability engineering methods have been applied in the design and evaluation of health care software, available heuristics focus on task-work aspects and do not address stigma associated with many health conditions. We used a previous set of heuristics and propose a new set of anti-stigma heuristics to evaluate stigmatization in health care websites. The extended set of heuristics were concurrently applied in a heuristic evaluation and a cognitive walkthrough to evaluate an endometriosis and sexual pain website. The walkthrough involved 5 tasks that required 21 actions to execute. Twenty-six usability problems were identified and recommendations for re-design were made to the design team before end-user testing. The anti-stigma heuristics received worse ratings than the traditional heuristics, resulting in several design changes that might otherwise have been missed. Thus, the new anti-stigma heuristics were a valuable contribution.
Full text 1,049 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
User interface evaluation has become important in developing usable health care technologies. Although usability engineering methods have been applied in the design and evaluation of health care software, available heuristics focus on task-work aspects and do not address stigma associated with many health conditions. We used a previous set of heuristics and propose a new set of anti-stigma heuristics to evaluate stigmatization in health care websites. The extended set of heuristics were concurrently applied in a heuristic evaluation and a cognitive walkthrough to evaluate an endometriosis and sexual pain website. The walkthrough involved 5 tasks that required 21 actions to execute. Twenty-six usability problems were identified and recommendations for re-design were made to the design team before end-user testing. The anti-stigma heuristics received worse ratings than the traditional heuristics, resulting in several design changes that might otherwise have been missed. Thus, the new anti-stigma heuristics were a valuable contribution.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Heuristics

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:24:08.918168+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine