Tittle Page POCUS versus chest X-ray in high frequency oscillatory ventilation

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

Introduction: The most prevalent method for evaluating lung expansion in high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) is chest X-ray (CXR). The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of chest radiography with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in determining lung expansion. Methods: : This prospective study included newborns who required HFOV and were being monitored in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. A single neonatologist assessed lung expansion with a chest x-ray and POCUS, to measure the costal level of the right hemidiaphragm and compare the results. Results: : A neonatologist took 55 measurements on 28 newborns with a gestational age of 32 (23.2-39.4) weeks who were followed on HFOV. The rib counts obtained from anterior chest ultrasonography and posterior CXR showed a statistically high concordance (p<0.05). Conclusions: : Lung ultrasonography is a reliable method in the evaluation of lung expansion in patients followed on HFOV.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-16T06:22:10.609676+00:00