Contrasting Broad- and Clinically- defined Polygenic Indicators of Depression and Depression-related Phenotypes in Adults and Children

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Twin studies indicate that 30-40% of the disease liability for depression can be attributed to genetic differences. Here, we assess the explanatory ability of polygenic scores (PGS) based on broad- (PGSBD) and clinical- (PGSMDD) depression summary statistics from the UK Biobank using a sample of adults (N=210; 100% European Ancestry) who have been extensively phenotyped for depression and related neurocognitive traits (e.g., rumination, emotion regulation, anhedonia, and resting frontal alpha asymmetry). PGS associations with depression severity and diagnosis were generally modest (β’s ranging from 0.150 (PGSMDD on current depression diagnosis) to 0.177 (PGS PGSBD on current depression diagnosis)). Overall, the UK Biobank-derived broad-depression PGS had a small but significant association with suicidal ideation (such that higher PGSBD was associated with suicidal ideation) but its association with other neurocognitive variables was minimal. The UK Biobank-derived MDD PGS had limited transportability to endo/intermediary phenotypes measured in this study.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00