Analyzing the Effects of Organic Amendments on Soil Erosion Dynamics: A Comprehensive Study on Application Methods and Timing

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Various factors, including the type and duration of soil amendment interaction and application method, can influence soil properties and loss. This laboratory study examined the impact of different soil amendments—barberry biochar, vermicompost, poultry manure, and wheat straw residues—applied in two forms (incorporating and surface spreading) at 60-day intervals over 180 days. The investigation focused on soil texture changes, runoff volume, and sediment rate. All treatments, including the control, were replicated four times. Soil texture was assessed before and after applying amendments and rainfall, while runoff and sediment were measured using a standard rainfall simulator. Data analysis involved variance analysis and mean comparison (P < 0.05) through a completely randomized design using JAM13 software. The findings revealed that employing a rainfall simulator enhances the proportion of sand while diminishing the percentages of silt and clay in the soil. This study compares soil amendment methods for their impact on runoff, erosion, and sedimentation. Barberry biochar, especially when applied on the surface, consistently demonstrated superior effectiveness in reducing these issues compared to other methods. Control treatments consistently showed higher values for runoff and sedimentation. The 180-day duration proved most effective in mitigating erosion. Overall, this research emphasizes the efficacy of surface-applied barberry biochar in reducing soil erosion and sedimentation. The results carry practical implications for sustainable soil management, particularly in regions cultivating barberry, and underscore the necessity for ongoing research across diverse geographic and climatic contexts.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00