Assessment of ovarian reserve after hysterectomy: Laparoscopic vs. non-laparoscopic surgery

In: European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · 2016 · vol. 210 , pp. 54–57 · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.12.003 · PMID:27940394 · W2560081879
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 5 in-corpus citations
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-12

This paper assessed ovarian reserve after hysterectomy, comparing outcomes between laparoscopic and non-laparoscopic surgical approaches.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (31)

Cited by (5)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-14T06:51:18.184320+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK