Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the association between implementation of a standardized endocavitary sonography image-documentation protocol, developed in accordance with the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) consensus, and the diagnostic performance for compartment-specific deep endometriosis (DE) lesions, and to explore its feasibility as a component of routine ultrasound quality assurance.
Methods
This single-center retrospective before-and-after controlled study included 783 patients who underwent dedicated ultrasound examination for DE at Peking University Shenzhen Hospital between January 2023 and September 2025 and subsequently underwent laparoscopic surgery within 6 months with complete surgical and pathological confirmation. According to the implementation of the standardized image documentation protocol in November 2024, patients were divided into a pre-implementation group and a post-implementation group. The protocol was developed based on the four-steps scanning framework of the IDEA consensus and required mandatory documentation of 19 standard sections and standardized recording of procedural information. The documentation rate of standard sections, examination duration, and diagnostic performance indices were compared between groups.
Results
A total of 783 patients were included (pre-implementation, n=267; post-implementation, n=516), with comparable baseline characteristics. Following protocol introduction, documentation rates significantly improved for 15 of 19 core ultrasound sections after Bonferroni correction (P<0.0026), with absolute gains of 47.9%–63.3% for previously underreported sections including the uterovesical pouch, ureters, rectovaginal septum, and lower rectum. Median examination duration remained unchanged (719 vs. 723 seconds; P=0.529).For deep endometriosis at posterior compartment sites, specificity increased significantly for pouch of Douglas obliteration (80.0% to 93.9%, P<0.001) and rectosigmoid colon involvement (79.9% to 90.0%, P<0.001), with both differences remaining robust after multiple comparison correction. Sensitivity for the uterine sliding sign improved from 74.0% to 95.1% (P<0.001). Although adenomyosis detection sensitivity also rose (82.5% to 94.9%, P=0.003), adenomyosis and ovarian endometrioma are considered endometriosis-related manifestations rather than DE-specific anatomical sites.In a subgroup analysis of 14 patients with ureteral DE, the mean ureteral diameter near the bladder orifice was significantly larger on the involved side compared with the contralateral uninvolved side (median 3.13 mm, IQR 2.70–3.30 vs. 2.15 mm, IQR 1.90–2.50; P<0.001).
Conclusion
A standardized ultrasound image documentation protocol for dedicated DE examination, established based on the IDEA consensus, may represents a feasible quality-control strategy for DE ultrasound, without significantly prolonging examination duration. However, its clinical generalizability and effect on diagnostic consistency require further validation in large-scale multicenter prospective studies.
Abbreviations
- IDEA:
-
International Deep Endometriosis Analysis
- DE:
-
Deep Endometriosis
- WMA:
-
World Medical Association
- POD:
-
Pouch of Douglas
- MUSA:
-
Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment
- rASRM:
-
revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine
- EFI:
-
Endometriosis Fertility Index
- CRF:
-
Case Report Form
- PPV:
-
Positive Predictive Value
- NPV:
-
Negative Predictive Value
Acknowledgements
The authors thank all participants who took part in this study. We also thank the Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital for technical support.
Funding
This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China(No.2023YFC3402605).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital (Approval No. PKUSZHS-2026049). The standardized IDEA-based ultrasound image documentation protocol was implemented in November 2024 as part of routine clinical quality-control practice, independent of this retrospective analysis. All study procedures were conducted in accordance with the WMA Declaration of Helsinki 2024.The need for individual patient informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study and the use of anonymized imaging data.
Consent for publication
Not Applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, N., Li, X., Sun, R. et al. Before-and-after evaluation of an IDEA-based standardized ultrasound image documentation protocol for deep endometriosis ultrasound assessment. BMC Women's Health (2026). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-026-04759-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-026-04759-7
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.